STUDIES of the effects of predators on prey diversity have usually focused on patterns of predation that do not by themselves increase diversity. For example, size-selective fish decrease diversity by driving large bodied zooplankton to local extinction1. Size-selective predators can maintain a diversity of species only if large bodied prey hold some advantage over smaller prey, such as the difference in feeding efficiency hypothesised by Brooks and Dodson (ref. 1 and see ref. 2 for review). The diversifying effect of nonselective predation on competitors for space in the rocky intertidal zone3 depends on the presence of differences among competitors in time of settlement during the year. In contrast, selective removal of common prey tends to reverse any numerical advantage gained by one species over another. Thus it is of interest to see whether numerically selective predators increase diversity by equalising prey numbers. The results presented here show that general predators in fact repeatedly equalise the relative abundance of prey species and hence tend to stabilise prey communities.
[1]
E. C. Pielou,et al.
An introduction to mathematical ecology
,
1970
.
[2]
D. Griffiths.
Prey Availability and the Food of Predators
,
1975
.
[3]
D. J. Hall,et al.
The Size-Efficiency Hypothesis and the Size Structure of Zooplankton Communities
,
1976
.
[4]
J. Goss‐Custard.
Predator Responses and Prey Mortality in Redshank, Tringa totanus (L.), and a Preferred Prey, Corophium volutator (Pallas)
,
1977
.
[5]
F. D. McCracken.
Seasonal Movements of the Winter Flounder, Pseudopleuronectes americanus (Walbaum), on the Atlantic Coast
,
1963
.
[6]
R. Paine.
Food Web Complexity and Species Diversity
,
1966,
The American Naturalist.
[7]
S. Dodson,et al.
Predation, Body Size, and Composition of Plankton.
,
1965,
Science.
[8]
M. C. Baker.
Foraging Behavior of Black-Bellied Plovers (Pluvialis Squatarola)
,
1974
.