Open government and e-government: democratic challenges from a public value perspective

We consider open government (OG) within the context of e-government and its broader implications for the future of public administration. We argue that the current US Administration's Open Government Initiative blurs traditional distinctions between e-democracy and e-government by incorporating historically democratic practices, now enabled by emerging technology, within administrative agencies. We consider how transparency, participation, and collaboration function as democratic practices in administrative agencies, suggesting that these processes are instrumental attributes of administrative action and decision making, rather than the objective of administrative action, as they appear to be currently treated. We propose alternatively that planning and assessing OG be addressed within a "public value" framework. The creation of public value is the goal of public organizations; through public value, public organizations meet the needs and wishes of the public with respect to substantive benefits as well as the intrinsic value of better government. We extend this view to OG by using the framework as a way to describe the value produced when interaction between government and citizens becomes more transparent, participative, and collaborative, i.e., more democratic.

[1]  Anthony M. Cresswell.  The Public Value of Government ICT Investments: Foundations and Applications , 2010, I3E.

[2]  Sharon S. Dawes,et al.  Stewardship and usefulness: Policy principles for information-based transparency , 2010, Gov. Inf. Q..

[3]  Molly W. Andolina,et al.  Investing in Democracy: Engaging Citizens in Collaborative Governance , 2010 .

[4]  Glenn Hui,et al.  Creating Public Value in E‐Government: A Public‐Private‐Citizen Collaboration Framework in Web 2.0 , 2010 .

[5]  Daniel Lathrop,et al.  Open Government: Collaboration, Transparency, and Participation in Practice , 2010 .

[6]  B. Noveck.  Wiki Government: How Technology Can Make Government Better, Democracy Stronger, and Citizens More Powerful , 2009 .

[7]  Janine O'Flynn,et al.  Making Sense of Public Value: Concepts, Critiques and Emergent Meanings , 2009 .

[8]  David de Ferranti,et al.  How to Improve Governance: A New Framework for Analysis and Action , 2009 .

[9]  B. Obama.  Memorandum for the Heads of Executive Departments and Agencies: Open Data Policy--Managing Information as an Asset , 2013 .

[10]  M. Hindman.  The Myth of Digital Democracy , 2008 .

[11]  S. Dawes.  The Evolution and Continuing Challenges of E-Governance , 2008 .

[12]  J. Alford,et al.  Public Value Pragmatism as the Next Phase of Public Management , 2008 .

[13]  John Wanna,et al.  The Limits to Public Value, or Rescuing Responsible Government from the Platonic Guardians , 2007 .

[14]  Janine O’Flynn,et al.  From New Public Management to Public Value: Paradigmatic Change and Managerial Implications , 2007 .

[15]  Chris Taylor,et al.  Transparency: The Key to Better Governance? , 2007 .

[16]  Ann Florini,et al.  The Right to Know: Transparency for an Open World , 2007 .

[17]  Archon Fung.  Varieties of Participation in Complex Governance , 2006 .

[18]  Michael Mcguire.  Collaborative Public Management: Assessing What We Know and How We Know It , 2006 .

[19]  Albert Jacob Meijer,et al.  Does transparency strengthen legitimacy? , 2006, Inf. Polity.

[20]  G. Stoker.  Public Value Management , 2006 .

[21]  J. Creighton.  The Public Participation Handbook: Making Better Decisions Through Citizen Involvement , 2005 .

[22]  Jane E. Fountain.  Central Issues in the Political Development of the Virtual State , 2005 .

[23]  L. Salamon,et al.  ACCOUNTABILITY CHALLENGES OF THIRD PARTY GOVERNANCE Paper Prepared for the 20 Anniversary Structure and Organization of Government Research Committee of the International Political Science Association June 15-18, 2004 Vancouver, Canada , 2004 .

[24]  C. Benito.  Annual Review of Information Science and Technology (ARIST) , 2003 .

[25]  C. May,et al.  Interaction between States and Citizens in the Age of the Internet: “e-Government” in the United States, Britain, and the European Union , 2003 .

[26]  L. Salamon,et al.  The tools of government : a guide to the new governance , 2002 .

[27]  Teresa M. Harrison,et al.  Democracy and New Communication Technologies , 2001 .

[28]  Teresa M. Harrison,et al.  Chapter 1: Democracy and New Communication Technologies , 2001 .

[29]  G. Rowe,et al.  Public Participation Methods: A Framework for Evaluation , 2000 .

[30]  Keith G. Provan,et al.  Do networks really work? A framework for evaluating public-sector organizational networks , 1999 .

[31]  C. King,et al.  The Question of Participation: Toward Authentic Public Participation in Public Administration , 1998 .

[32]  K. Hacker.  Missing links in the evolution of electronic democratization , 1996 .

[33]  A G M Jan,et al.  Models of Democracy – Behind the Design and Use of New Media in Politics , 1996 .

[34]  M. Moore.  Creating public value : strategic management in government , 1995 .

[35]  Brenda Dervin.  Information ↔ democracy: an examination of underlying assumptions , 1994 .

[36]  Cornelius M. Kerwin,et al.  Rulemaking: How Government Agencies Write Law and Make Policy , 2019 .

[37]  Dale Bertelsen.  Media form and government: Democracy as an archetypal image in the electronic age , 1992 .

[38]  Ronald D. Doctor,et al.  Social equity and information technologies: moving toward information democracy , 1992 .

[39]  George A. Trey.  The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry Into a Category of Bourgeois Society , 1991 .

[40]  D. Rucinski.  The centrality of reciprocity to communication and democracy , 1991 .

[41]  Gary R. Orren,et al.  The Electronic Commonwealth: The Impact of New Media Technologies on Democratic Politics by Jeffrey B. Abramson, et al (review) , 1989, American Political Science Review.

[42]  J. Habermas,et al.  The structural transformation of the public sphere : an inquiryinto a category of bourgeois society , 1991 .

[43]  H. George Frederickson,et al.  Public Administration and Social Equity. , 1990 .

[44]  赫尓徳,et al.  民主的模式 = Models of democracy , 1986 .

[45]  Benjamin R. Barber,et al.  Strong Democracy: Participatory Politics for a New Age , 1985 .

[46]  M. Kweit,et al.  Implementing citizen participation in a bureaucratic society: A contingency approach , 1981 .

[47]  R. C. Cramton.  The Why, Where and How of Broadened Public Participation in the Administrative Process , 1972 .