Attribute Conflict and Preference Uncertainty: Effects on Judgment Time and Error.: Effects on Judgment Time and Error.

This research investigates preference uncertainty generated as a function of specific alternative characteristics during multiattribute evaluative judgments. We propose that preference uncertainty has at least two behavioral manifestations: longer judgment times and greater response error in expressed preferences. We investigate two hypotheses regarding stimulus-based causes of preference uncertainty. As predicted by our attribute conflict hypothesis, greater within-alternative conflict discrepancy among the attributes of an evaluative alternative led to longer judgment times and greater response error. As predicted by our attribute extremity hypothesis, greater attribute extremity very high or low attribute values resulted in shorter judgment times and less response error. We also found that judgment times and response errors were strongly positively correlated at the item level, consistent with our assumption that preference uncertainty generated by stimulus characteristics is manifested in judgment time and error. Finally, we found that the item-level preference uncertainty effects proposed here operate in parallel with strategy-level, effort-accuracy tradeoffs observable across participants. These findings are consistent with the RandMAU random multiattribute utility model developed in a companion article by Fischer et al. 2000.

[1]  D. Berlyne Conflict and Reaction Time: Reply to Kiesler , 1966, Psychological reports.

[2]  Eric J. Johnson,et al.  Information displays and preference reversals , 1988 .

[3]  R. Sugden,et al.  Regret Theory: An alternative theory of rational choice under uncertainty Review of Economic Studies , 1982 .

[4]  Kathryn B. Laskey,et al.  Estimating utility functions in the presence of response error , 1987 .

[5]  Benedict G. C. Dellaert,et al.  Complexity and Accuracy in Consumer Choice: The Double Benefits of Being the Consistently Better Brand , 2001 .

[6]  George S. Avrunin,et al.  Single-Peaked Functions and the Theory of Preference. , 1977 .

[7]  R. L. Keeney,et al.  Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Trade-Offs , 1977, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[8]  H. J. Einhorn,et al.  Expression theory and the preference reversal phenomena. , 1987 .

[9]  M. F. Luce,et al.  Choosing to Avoid: Coping with Negatively Emotion-Laden Consumer Decisions , 1998 .

[10]  G. W. Fischer,et al.  Strategy compatibility, scale compatibility, and the prominence effect. , 1993 .

[11]  B. Fischhoff,et al.  Calibration of probabilities: the state of the art to 1980 , 1982 .

[12]  Mary Frances Luce,et al.  Attribute Conflict and Preference Uncertainty: The RandMAU Model , 2000 .

[13]  Flemming Hansen,et al.  Consumer Choice Behavior. A Cognitive Theory , 1973 .

[14]  K. Lewin Field theory in social science , 1951 .

[15]  David E. Bell,et al.  Regret in Decision Making under Uncertainty , 1982, Oper. Res..

[16]  G. W. Fischer,et al.  Multidimensional utility models for risky and riskless choice , 1976 .

[17]  J. March Bounded rationality, ambiguity, and the engineering of choice , 1978 .

[18]  Dan Ariely,et al.  Goal-Based Construction of Preferences: Task Goals and the Prominence Effect , 1999 .

[19]  John W. Payne,et al.  The adaptive decision maker: Name index , 1993 .

[20]  Charles A. Kiesler,et al.  Conflict and Number of Choice Alternatives , 1966 .

[21]  Eric J. Johnson,et al.  The adaptive decision maker , 1993 .

[22]  M. F. Luce,et al.  Correlation, conflict, and choice. , 1993 .

[23]  A. Tversky,et al.  Contingent weighting in judgment and choice , 1988 .

[24]  A. Tversky,et al.  Choice under Conflict: The Dynamics of Deferred Decision , 1992 .

[25]  L. Festinger,et al.  A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance , 2017 .

[26]  Tim Smithin,et al.  Judgement and Choice, 2nd Edition , 1988 .

[27]  Benedict G. C. Dellaert,et al.  Optimal Effort in Consumer Choice : Theory and Experimental Evidence for Binary Choice , 2001 .