Consistent and reproducible positioning in longitudinal imaging for phenotyping genetically modified swine

Recent growth of genetic disease models in swine has presented the opportunity to advance translation of developed imaging protocols, while characterizing the genotype to phenotype relationship. Repeated imaging with multiple clinical modalities provides non-invasive detection, diagnosis, and monitoring of disease to accomplish these goals; however, longitudinal scanning requires repeatable and reproducible positioning of the animals. A modular positioning unit was designed to provide a fixed, stable base for the anesthetized animal through transit and imaging. Post ventilation and sedation, animals were placed supine in the unit and monitored for consistent vitals. Comprehensive imaging was performed with a computed tomography (CT) chest-abdomen-pelvis scan at each screening time point. Longitudinal images were rigidly registered, accounting for rotation, translation, and anisotropic scaling, and the skeleton was isolated using a basic thresholding algorithm. Assessment of alignment was quantified via eleven pairs of corresponding points on the skeleton with the first time point as the reference. Results were obtained with five animals over five screening time points. The developed unit aided in skeletal alignment within an average of 13.13 ± 6.7 mm for all five subjects providing a strong foundation for developing qualitative and quantitative methods of disease tracking.

[1]  Patrick L Chow,et al.  A method of image registration for small animal, multi-modality imaging , 2006, Physics in medicine and biology.

[2]  Milan Sonka,et al.  3D Slicer as an image computing platform for the Quantitative Imaging Network. , 2012, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[3]  E. Hoffman,et al.  Longitudinal assessment of lung cancer progression in the mouse using in vivo micro-CT imaging. , 2010, Medical physics.

[4]  Charl P. Botha,et al.  Towards integrated analysis of longitudinal whole-body small animal imaging studies , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP).

[5]  A. J. Rowe Model maker , 1988, Nature.

[6]  Raj Shekhar,et al.  Medical Image Processing , 2010, Handbook of Signal Processing Systems.

[7]  K. Smetana,et al.  The Miniature Pig as an Animal Model in Biomedical Research , 2005, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[8]  D. Meyerholz,et al.  Development and translational imaging of a TP53 porcine tumorigenesis model. , 2014, The Journal of clinical investigation.

[9]  M. Swindle,et al.  Swine in Biomedical Research: Management and Models , 1994 .

[10]  David R. Haynor,et al.  PET-CT image registration in the chest using free-form deformations , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[11]  David K. Meyerholz,et al.  Disruption of the CFTR Gene Produces a Model of Cystic Fibrosis in Newborn Pigs , 2008, Science.

[12]  M. Jong,et al.  Imaging preclinical tumour models: improving translational power , 2014, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[13]  R. Phillips,et al.  The Yucatan minature pig as a laboratory animal. , 1978, Laboratory animal science.