Comparative study of self-rating pain scales in osteoarthritis patients.

Although progress has been made in the clinical metrology of pain in osteoarthritis, much further work remains. The preferred methods of measurement remain debatable. In this longitudinal, open study, a comparison of eight self-rating pain scales has been conducted. A total of 333 patients entered the four-week study after completing a 3-7 day NSAID-free washout period. Patients were assigned to treatment with oxaprozin 1200 mg p.o. once daily with titration permitted between 600 mg and 1800 mg. Rescue analgesia with acetaminophen (paracetamol) 325 mg (maximum 2600 mg) was allowed. At the end of the washout and the treatment period, patients completed eight self-administered pain scales. All pain measures detected clinically important and statistically significant improvements in pain. The pain scales differed in their degree of responsiveness. The Likert and visual analogue scales and their primary variations (continuous chromatic analogue and numerical scales) were more responsive than more complex measures. A positive correlation between initial pain rating and subsequent pain relief was confirmed in this study. We conclude that, while pain is a subjective sensory phenomenon, its perceived severity can be evaluated using a variety of self-administered pain scales, all of which are capable of detecting improvements in health status following effective pharmacological intervention.

[1]  E. Cerchiari,et al.  Analogue chromatic continuous scale (ACCS): a new method for pain assessment. , 1983, Clinical and experimental rheumatology.

[2]  W. Downie,et al.  Studies with pain rating scales. , 1978, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.

[3]  J. Ganju,et al.  The efficacy, tolerability, and safety of 1200 mg/d of oxaprozin and 1500 mg/d of nabumetone in the treatment of patients with osteoarthritis of the knee. , 1996, Clinical therapeutics.

[4]  R. Trapp,et al.  Comparison of the efficacy and safety of oxaprozin and nabumetone in the treatment of patients with osteoarthritis of the knee. , 1995, Clinical therapeutics.

[5]  R. Altman,et al.  Criteria for classification of clinical osteoarthritis. , 1991, The Journal of rheumatology. Supplement.

[6]  J. Moll,et al.  A comparison of three ways of measuring pain. , 1982, Rheumatology and rehabilitation.

[7]  E. Huskisson Measurement of pain. , 1974, Lancet.

[8]  R. Reeve,et al.  The faces pain scale for the self-assessment of the severity of pain experienced by children: Development, initial validation, and preliminary investigation for ratio scale properties , 1990, Pain.

[9]  N. Bellamy,et al.  Circadian rhythm in pain, stiffness, and manual dexterity in rheumatoid arthritis: relation between discomfort and disability. , 1991, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.

[10]  C. Bombardier,et al.  Auranofin therapy and quality of life in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Results of a multicenter trial. , 1986, The American journal of medicine.

[11]  N Bellamy,et al.  Quantitative rheumatology: a survey of outcome measurement procedures in routine rheumatology outpatient practice in Canada. , 1998, The Journal of rheumatology.