Performance comparison between IEEE 802.11p and LTE-V2V in-coverage and out-of-coverage for cooperative awareness

Cooperative awareness, consisting in the periodic broadcasting of messages, called beacons, to inform neighboring vehicles about maneuvers, changes of direction and other relevant mobility information, represents the core requirement to enable applications that may increase road safety and transportation efficiency. Up to few months ago, when latest 3GPP Release added to long term evolution (LTE) the support of vehicle-to-vehicle (V2V) communications, the only suitable standard was IEEE 802.11p in the U.S. and the corresponding ITS-G5 in Europe. The choice regarding the worldwide adoption of one of the two technologies is still under discussion, since both show advantages and drawbacks. In this work, we analyze IEEE 802.11p and LTE-V2V and evaluate their performance for the cooperative awareness service through simulations in a realistic highway scenario. Both in-coverage and out-of-coverage conditions are considered for LTE-V2V. Results reveal that LTE-V2V incoverage is the best solution in terms of packet reception ratio for all the considered values of beacon size and communication range. As far as the beacon update delay is concerned, we observe that LTE-V2V in-coverage still provides the best performance when small packets are transmitted, while IEEE 802.11p gives the best results for values of the communication range higher than 100 m when the packet size is increased.

[1]  Thomas Kürner,et al.  Physical Layer Performance Comparison of LTE and IEEE 802.11p for Vehicular Communication in an Urban NLOS Scenario , 2014, 2014 IEEE 80th Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC2014-Fall).

[2]  Zeeshan Hameed Mir,et al.  LTE and IEEE 802.11p for vehicular networking: a performance evaluation , 2014, EURASIP J. Wirel. Commun. Netw..

[3]  Sinem Coleri Ergen,et al.  Multihop-Cluster-Based IEEE 802.11p and LTE Hybrid Architecture for VANET Safety Message Dissemination , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology.

[4]  Elias Yaacoub,et al.  QoE Enhancement of SVC Video Streaming Over Vehicular Networks Using Cooperative LTE/802.11p Communications , 2015, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing.

[5]  Zeeshan Hameed Mir,et al.  On the Performance Comparison between IEEE 802.11p and LTE-Based Vehicular Networks , 2014, 2014 IEEE 79th Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC Spring).

[6]  François Baccelli,et al.  A performance analysis of CSMA based broadcast protocol in VANETs , 2013, 2013 Proceedings IEEE INFOCOM.

[7]  Barbara M. Masini,et al.  Cellular aided vehicular named data networking , 2014, 2014 International Conference on Connected Vehicles and Expo (ICCVE).

[8]  Barbara M. Masini,et al.  A Survey on Infrastructure-Based Vehicular Networks , 2017, Mob. Inf. Syst..

[9]  Li Zhao,et al.  LTE-V: A TD-LTE-Based V2X Solution for Future Vehicular Network , 2016, IEEE Internet of Things Journal.

[10]  Luca Delgrossi,et al.  Optimal data rate selection for vehicle safety communications , 2008, VANET '08.

[11]  Barbara M. Masini,et al.  On the Performance of IEEE 802.11p and LTE-V2V for the Cooperative Awareness of Connected Vehicles , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology.

[12]  Barbara M. Masini,et al.  Localization-based resource selection schemes for network-controlled LTE-V2V , 2017, 2017 International Symposium on Wireless Communication Systems (ISWCS).

[13]  Barbara M. Masini,et al.  How many vehicles in the LTE-V2V awareness range with half or full duplex radios? , 2017, 2017 15th International Conference on ITS Telecommunications (ITST).

[14]  Alexey V. Vinel,et al.  3GPP LTE Versus IEEE 802.11p/WAVE: Which Technology is Able to Support Cooperative Vehicular Safety Applications? , 2012, IEEE Wireless Communications Letters.

[15]  Stephan Eichler,et al.  Performance Evaluation of the IEEE 802.11p WAVE Communication Standard , 2007, 2007 IEEE 66th Vehicular Technology Conference.

[16]  Mohamed-Slim Alouini,et al.  Delay-sensitive content distribution via peer-to-peer collaboration in public safety vehicular ad-hoc networks , 2014, Ad Hoc Networks.

[17]  Barbara M. Masini,et al.  LTEV2Vsim: An LTE-V2V simulator for the investigation of resource allocation for cooperative awareness , 2017, 2017 5th IEEE International Conference on Models and Technologies for Intelligent Transportation Systems (MT-ITS).

[18]  Andreas Festag,et al.  Standards for vehicular communication—from IEEE 802.11p to 5G , 2015, e & i Elektrotechnik und Informationstechnik.

[19]  Gianni Pasolini,et al.  SHINE: Simulation platform for Heterogeneous Interworking Networks , 2006, 2006 IEEE International Conference on Communications.

[20]  Aravind Kota Gopalakrishna,et al.  QoS-enabled group communication in integrated VANET-LTE heterogeneous wireless networks , 2011, 2011 IEEE 7th International Conference on Wireless and Mobile Computing, Networking and Communications (WiMob).

[21]  Barbara M. Masini,et al.  Visible light communications as a complementary technology for the internet of vehicles , 2016, Comput. Commun..