Automatic Speech Recognition Technology as an Effective Means for Teaching Pronunciation.

Al al-Bayt University, Jordan alifarhan66@gmail.com This study aimed to explore the effect of using automatic speech recognition technology (asr) on the third grade efl students’ performance in pronunciation, whether teaching pronunciation through asr is better than regular instruction, and the most effective teaching technique (individual work, pair work, or group work) in teaching pronunciation through asr. Sixty-four 3rd grade male and female students in the second semester of the scholastic year 2012/2013 at Al-Abrar Basic Mixed School were selected as the study sample. They were randomly assigned into four groups, three experimental and one control. The three experimental groups were taught using asr method. They used the Tell Me More Performance English program to practice pronunciation. The control group was taught using regular instruction by the same teacher. The findings of the study showed that there were statistically significant differences between the mean scores of the control (regular instruction) and the experimental (asr) groups in favor of the experimental group. Furthermore, the findings revealed that there was a statistically significant difference in the mean scores between individual work, pair-work, and group-work in favor of the individual work method. The findings also revealed that there was no significant correlation between the level (word, sentence, and real-life dialogue), and the experimental group students’ performance on the pronunciation post-test. However, students performed better at the dialogue level than at the word, and sentence levels. Finally, a number of related recommendations are presented for teachers and researchers to consider. the

[1]  Barbara Beyerbach,et al.  Infusing Technology into Preservice Teacher Education , 2001 .

[2]  George Yule,et al.  Attempts to Improve English L2 Pronunciation: The Variable Effects of Different Types of Instruction , 1994 .

[3]  Satoshi Nakamura,et al.  Automatic pronunciation scoring of words and sentences independent from the non-native's first language , 2009, Comput. Speech Lang..

[4]  Krystyna A. Wachowicz,et al.  Software That Listens: It's Not a Question of Whether, It's a Question of How , 1999 .

[5]  Ron Good,et al.  Effects of cooperative grouping on stoichiometric problem solving in high school chemistry , 1990 .

[6]  Helmer Strik,et al.  Automatic Speech Recognition for second language learning: How and why it actually works , 2003 .

[7]  Michael H. Long.  Task, Group, and Task-Group Interactions. , 1990 .

[8]  Fatima Zaki Mohammad Al-Qudah,et al.  Improving English Pronunciation through Computer-Assisted Programs in Jordanian Universities. , 2012 .

[9]  April A. Kedrowicz,et al.  Infusing Technical Communication and Teamwork within the ECE Curriculum , 2006 .

[10]  E. Cohen.  Restructuring the Classroom: Conditions for Productive Small Groups , 1994 .

[11]  Karin Wiburg,et al.  Technology and Teaching English Language Learners , 2002 .

[12]  Keiko Kitade,et al.  THE ROLE OF OFFLINE METALANGUAGE TALK IN ASYNCHRONOUS COMPUTER-MEDIATED COMMUNICATION , 2008 .

[13]  Helmer Strik,et al.  The effectiveness of computer-based speech corrective feedback for improving segmental quality in l2 dutch , 2008, ReCALL.

[14]  Murat Hismanoglu,et al.  Teaching Word Stress to Turkish EFL (English as a Foreign Language) Learners through Internet-Based Video Lessons. , 2012 .

[15]  David H. Jonassen,et al.  Computers in the Classroom: Mindtools for Critical Thinking , 1995 .

[16]  Nancy Armstrong Melser.  Gifted students and cooperative learning: A study of grouping strategies , 1999 .

[17]  Pao-Ta Yu,et al.  A Multimedia English Learning System Using HMMs to Improve Phonemic Awareness for English Learning , 2009, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[18]  In-Seok Kim,et al.  Automatic Speech Recognition: Reliability and Pedagogical Implications for Teaching Pronunciation , 2006, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[19]  Su Tseng Lee,et al.  Teaching pronunciation of English using computer assisted learning software: An action research study in an Institute of Technology in Taiwan , 2008 .

[20]  Robert E. Slavin,et al.  Cooperative Learning in Middle and Secondary Schools. , 1996 .

[21]  William B. Joyce.  On the Free-Rider Problem in Cooperative Learning , 1999 .

[22]  P. Zepeda,et al.  The teaching of pronunciation , 2010 .

[23]  David W. Johnson,et al.  New Developments in Social Interdependence Theory , 2005, Genetic, social, and general psychology monographs.

[24]  Jens Edlund,et al.  Promoting Increased Pitch Variation in Oral Presentations with Transient Visual Feedback. , 2009 .

[25]  Dolores Ramírez Verdugo,et al.  A Study of Intonation Awareness and Learning in Non-native Speakers of English , 2006 .

[26]  Rodney H. Jones.  Beyond "listen and repeat": Pronunciation teaching materials and theories of second language acquisition , 1997 .

[27]  Forbes Ave. Pittsburgh,et al.  PINPOINTING PRONUNCIATION ERRORS IN CHILDREN ’ S SPEECH : EXAMINING THE ROLE OF THE SPEECH RECOGNIZER , 2000 .

[28]  John M. Levis.  Intonation in Theory and Practice, Revisited* , 1999 .

[29]  Diego Giuliani,et al.  The effectiveness of computer assisted pronunciation training for foreign language learning by children , 2008 .

[30]  Neal Strudler,et al.  First-year teachers' use of technology: preparation, expectations and realities , 1999 .

[31]  Karen M. Tateyama-Sniezek.  Cooperative Learning: Does it Improve the Academic Achievement of Students with Handicaps? , 1990, Exceptional children.

[32]  K. Lee,et al.  English teachers' barriers to the use of computer-assisted language learning , 2000 .

[33]  Maxine Eskenazi,et al.  Using a Computer in Foreign Language Pronunciation Training: What Advantages? , 1999 .

[34]  Mike Levy,et al.  Computer-Assisted Language Learning: Context and Conceptualization , 1997 .

[35]  Helmer Strik,et al.  Effective feedback on L2 pronunciation in ASR-based CALL , 2001 .

[36]  Ravi Purushotma,et al.  Commentary: You're Not Studying, You're Just... , 2005 .

[37]  Obeua S. Persons.  Factors Influencing Students' Peer Evaluation in Cooperative Learning. , 1998 .

[38]  David W. Johnson,et al.  Cooperative learning : increasing college faculty instructional productivity , 1991 .

[39]  R. Slavin.  Synthesis of Research on Cooperative Learning. , 1981 .

[40]  Simon Hooper,et al.  The effects of cooperative learning and learner control on students' achievement, option selections, and attitudes , 1998 .

[41]  David W. Johnson,et al.  Cooperative learning methods: A meta-analysis. , 2012 .

[42]  Rebecca Hincks,et al.  Computer support for learners of spoken English , 2005 .

[43]  Helmer Strik,et al.  The Pedagogy-Technology Interface in Computer Assisted Pronunciation Training , 2002 .

[44]  Rachel A. Lotan,et al.  Can Groups Learn , 2002 .

[45]  Lanadale Kewley.  Peer Collaboration versus Teacher-Directed Instruction: How Two Methodologies Engage Students in the Learning Process. , 1998 .

[46]  Martha C. Pennington,et al.  Computer-Aided Pronunciation Pedagogy: Promise, Limitations, Directions* , 1999 .

[47]  Maxine Eskénazi,et al.  An empirical study of the effectiveness of speech-recognition-based pronunciation training , 2000, INTERSPEECH.

[48]  G. Yule,et al.  Teaching the Spoken Language , 1986 .

[49]  Murat Hismanoglu,et al.  INTERNET-BASED PRONUNCIATION TEACHING: AN INNOVATIVE ROUTE TOWARD REHABILITATING TURKISH EFL LEARNERS' ARTICULATION PROBLEMS , 2011 .

[50]  Kristin Precoda,et al.  EduSpeak®: A speech recognition and pronunciation scoring toolkit for computer-aided language learning applications , 2010 .

[51]  Mark M. Graff.  A study of Rosetta Stone's effectiveness on improving English pronunciation , 2006 .