Abnormal Wave Reflections and Left Ventricular Hypertrophy Late After Coarctation of the Aorta Repair

Patients with repaired coarctation of the aorta are thought to have increased afterload due to abnormalities in vessel structure and function. We have developed a novel cardiovascular magnetic resonance protocol that allows assessment of central hemodynamics, including central aortic systolic blood pressure, resistance, total arterial compliance, pulse wave velocity, and wave reflections. The main study aims were to (1) characterize group differences in central aortic systolic blood pressure and peripheral systolic blood pressure, (2) comprehensively evaluate afterload (including wave reflections) in the 2 groups, and (3) identify possible biomarkers among covariates associated with elevated left ventricular mass (LVM). Fifty adult patients with repaired coarctation and 25 age- and sex-matched controls were recruited. Ascending aorta area and flow waveforms were obtained using a high temporal-resolution spiral phase-contrast cardiovascular magnetic resonance flow sequence. These data were used to derive central hemodynamics and to perform wave intensity analysis noninvasively. Covariates associated with LVM were assessed using multivariable linear regression analysis. There were no significant group differences (P≥0.1) in brachial systolic, mean, or diastolic BP. However central aortic systolic blood pressure was significantly higher in patients compared with controls (113 versus 107 mm Hg, P=0.002). Patients had reduced total arterial compliance, increased pulse wave velocity, and larger backward compression waves compared with controls. LVM index was significantly higher in patients than controls (72 versus 59 g/m2, P<0.0005). The magnitude of the backward compression waves was independently associated with variation in LVM (P=0.01). Using a novel, noninvasive hemodynamic assessment, we have shown abnormal conduit vessel function after coarctation of the aorta repair, including abnormal wave reflections that are associated with elevated LVM.

[1]  Joris Degroote,et al.  Differential impact of local stiffening and narrowing on hemodynamics in repaired aortic coarctation: an FSI study , 2015, Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing.

[2]  M. Quail,et al.  Noninvasive pulmonary artery wave intensity analysis in pulmonary hypertension , 2015, American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology.

[3]  R. Kronmal,et al.  Resistive and Pulsatile Arterial Load as Predictors of Left Ventricular Mass and Geometry: The Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis , 2015, Hypertension.

[4]  J. Cockcroft,et al.  Central blood pressure: current evidence and clinical importance. , 2014, European heart journal.

[5]  Jan Vierendeels,et al.  Wave reflection leads to over- and underestimation of local wave speed by the PU- and QA-loop methods: theoretical basis and solution to the problem , 2014, Physiological measurement.

[6]  Vivek Muthurangu,et al.  Development and validation of a novel method to derive central aortic systolic pressure from the MR aortic distension curve , 2013, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[7]  Giovanni Biglino,et al.  Aortic arch shape is not associated with hypertensive response to exercise in patients with repaired congenital heart diseases , 2013, Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance.

[8]  Joseph A. Dearani,et al.  Coarctation of the aorta: lifelong surveillance is mandatory following surgical repair. , 2013, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[9]  M. Quail,et al.  Use of cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging for TAVR assessment in patients with bioprosthetic aortic valves: comparison with computed tomography. , 2012, European journal of radiology.

[10]  R. Kronmal,et al.  Arterial wave reflections and incident cardiovascular events and heart failure: MESA (Multiethnic Study of Atherosclerosis). , 2012, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[11]  Jan Vierendeels,et al.  Comparison of Non-Invasive Methods for Measurement of Local Pulse Wave Velocity Using FSI-Simulations and In Vivo Data , 2012, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[12]  K. Parker,et al.  A non-invasive clinical application of wave intensity analysis based on ultrahigh temporal resolution phase-contrast cardiovascular magnetic resonance , 2012, Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance.

[13]  F. Lazeyras,et al.  Validation of a patient-specific one-dimensional model of the systemic arterial tree. , 2011, American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology.

[14]  Vivek Muthurangu,et al.  Rapid flow assessment of congenital heart disease with high-spatiotemporal-resolution gated spiral phase-contrast MR imaging. , 2011, Radiology.

[15]  David Atkinson,et al.  Automatic segmentation propagation of the aorta in real‐time phase contrast MRI using nonrigid registration , 2011, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[16]  L. Launer,et al.  Lowering Midlife Levels of Systolic Blood Pressure as a Public Health Strategy to Reduce Late-Life Dementia: Perspective From the Honolulu Heart Program/Honolulu Asia Aging Study , 2010, Hypertension.

[17]  L. Swan,et al.  Surveillance of cardiovascular risk in the normotensive patient with repaired aortic coarctation , 2010, International journal of cardiology.

[18]  Vivek Muthurangu,et al.  Feasibility and reproducibility of biventricular volumetric assessment of cardiac function during exercise using real‐time radial k‐t SENSE magnetic resonance imaging , 2009, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[19]  T. Graham Angular (Gothic) aortic arch leads to enhanced systolic wave reflection, central aortic stiffness, and increased left ventricular mass late after aortic coarctation repair: Evaluation with magnetic resonance flow mapping , 2009 .

[20]  Maria Siebes,et al.  Comparison of arterial waves derived by classical wave separation and wave intensity analysis in a model of aortic coarctation , 2009, Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing.

[21]  Yasmin,et al.  Central Pressure: Variability and Impact of Cardiovascular Risk Factors: The Anglo-Cardiff Collaborative Trial II , 2008, Hypertension.

[22]  B. Westerhof,et al.  Different role of wave reflection magnitude and timing on left ventricular mass reduction during antihypertensive treatment , 2008, Journal of hypertension.

[23]  I. Meredith,et al.  Arterial transfer functions and the reconstruction of central aortic waveforms: myths, controversies and misconceptions. , 2008, Journal of hypertension.

[24]  A. Hughes,et al.  DRUG EFFECTS ON THE MECHANICAL PROPERTIES OF LARGE ARTERIES IN HUMANS , 2007, Clinical and experimental pharmacology & physiology.

[25]  É. Mousseaux,et al.  Aortic arch shape deformation after coarctation surgery: effect on blood pressure response. , 2006, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[26]  R. Razavi,et al.  Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging After Stage I Norwood Operation for Hypoplastic Left Heart Syndrome , 2005, Circulation.

[27]  Vivek Muthurangu,et al.  Measurement of total pulmonary arterial compliance using invasive pressure monitoring and MR flow quantification during MR-guided cardiac catheterization. , 2005, American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology.

[28]  Andreas Kühn,et al.  Impaired Elastic Properties of the Ascending Aorta in Newborns Before and Early After Successful Coarctation Repair: Proof of a Systemic Vascular Disease of the Prestenotic Arteries? , 2005, Circulation.

[29]  Osman Ratib,et al.  OsiriX: An Open-Source Software for Navigating in Multidimensional DICOM Images , 2004, Journal of Digital Imaging.

[30]  Arnold P G Hoeks,et al.  Simultaneous assessment of diameter and pressure waveforms in the carotid artery. , 2004, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[31]  J. Deanfield,et al.  Vascular dysfunction after repair of coarctation of the aorta: Impact of Early Surgery , 2001, Circulation.

[32]  P Segers,et al.  Fixed region of nondistensibility after coarctation repair: in vitro validation of its influence on Doppler peak velocities. , 2001, Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography : official publication of the American Society of Echocardiography.

[33]  J. Staessen,et al.  Non-invasive assessment of local arterial pulse pressure: comparison of applanation tonometry and echo-tracking , 2001, Journal of hypertension.

[34]  R. Havlik,et al.  Midlife blood pressure and dementia: the Honolulu–Asia aging study☆ , 2000, Neurobiology of Aging.

[35]  M. Yano,et al.  Influence of aortic impedance on the development of pressure-overload left ventricular hypertrophy in rats. , 1996, Circulation.

[36]  D. Fitchett,et al.  Noninvasive determination of aortic input impedance and external left ventricular power output: a validation and repeatability study of a new technique. , 1992, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[37]  J. Laragh,et al.  Relation of left ventricular mass and geometry to morbidity and mortality in uncomplicated essential hypertension. , 1991, Annals of internal medicine.

[38]  D. Levy,et al.  Prognostic implications of echocardiographically determined left ventricular mass in the Framingham Heart Study. , 1990, The New England journal of medicine.

[39]  A. Hill,et al.  VELOCITY OF TRANSMISSION OF THE PULSE-WAVE: AND ELASTICITY OF ARTERIES , 1922 .

[40]  A. Hill,et al.  The Velocity of the Pulse Wave in Man , 1922 .