Distributed rate allocation for inelastic flows: optimization frameworks, optimality conditions, and optimal algorithms

A common assumption behind most of the recent research on network utility maximization is that traffic flows are elastic, which implies that their utility functions are concave and there are no hard limits on the rate allocated to each flow. These critical assumptions lead to tractability of the analytic models of utility maximization, but also limits applicability of the resulting rate allocation protocols. This paper focuses on inelastic flows and removes these restrictive and often invalid assumptions. We present several optimization frameworks, optimality conditions, and optimal algorithms. First, we consider nonconcave utility functions, which turn utility maximization into nonconvex, constrained optimization problems that are well-known to be difficult. We present conditions under which the current standard price-based distributed algorithm can still converge to the globally optimal rate allocation despite nonconcavity of utility functions. In particular, continuity of price-based rate allocation at all the optimal prices is a sufficient condition for global convergence of rate allocation by the standard algorithm, and continuity at at least one optimal price is a necessary condition. In the second part of the paper, we provide a general problem formulation of rate allocation among time-sensitive flows from real-time and streaming applications, as well as a decomposition into subproblems coordinated by pricing. After simplifying the subproblems by leveraging the optimization structures, we highlight the difficult issues of causality and time-scale, and propose an effective price-based heuristics for admission control and an optimal algorithm for a special case formulation.

[1]  Ness B. Shroff,et al.  Non-convex optimization and rate control for multi-class services in the Internet , 2005, IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking.

[2]  A. Ozdaglar,et al.  Min Common/Max Crossing Duality: A Simple Geometric Framework for Convex Optimization and Minimax Theory1 , 2003 .

[3]  Dimitri P. Bertsekas,et al.  Nonlinear Programming , 1997 .

[4]  Mung Chiang,et al.  Network rate allocation by nonconcave utility maximization , 2005 .

[5]  Wei Yu,et al.  Optimal multiuser spectrum management for digital subscriber lines , 2004, 2004 IEEE International Conference on Communications (IEEE Cat. No.04CH37577).

[6]  Scott Shenker,et al.  Fundamental Design Issues for the Future Internet (Invited Paper) , 1995, IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun..

[7]  R. Tyrrell Rockafellar,et al.  Lagrange Multipliers and Optimality , 1993, SIAM Rev..

[8]  Stephen P. Boyd,et al.  Convex Optimization , 2004, Algorithms and Theory of Computation Handbook.

[9]  Wei Yu,et al.  Dual optimization methods for multiuser orthogonal frequency division multiplex systems , 2004, IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference, 2004. GLOBECOM '04..

[10]  Frank Kelly,et al.  Rate control for communication networks: shadow prices, proportional fairness and stability , 1998, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[11]  Asuman E Ozdaglar,et al.  Pseudonormality and a Lagrange Multiplier Theory for Constrained Optimization , 2002 .

[12]  SCIENTIFIC , 1940 .

[13]  Stephen P. Boyd,et al.  QoS and fairness constrained convex optimization of resource allocation for wireless cellular and ad hoc networks , 2002, Proceedings.Twenty-First Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies.