Process-Based Principles for Restoring River Ecosystems

Process-based restoration aims to reestablish normative rates and magnitudes of physical, chemical, and biological processes that sustain river and floodplain ecosystems. Ecosystem conditions at any site are governed by hierarchical regional, watershed, and reach-scale processes controlling hydrologic and sediment regimes; floodplain and aquatic habitat dynamics; and riparian and aquatic biota. We outline and illustrate four process-based principles that ensure river restoration will be guided toward sustainable actions: (1) restoration actions should address the root causes of degradation, (2) actions must be consistent with the physical and biological potential of the site, (3) actions should be at a scale commensurate with environmental problems, and (4) actions should have clearly articulated expected outcomes for ecosystem dynamics. Applying these principles will help avoid common pitfalls in river restoration, such as creating habitat types that are outside of a site's natural potential, attempting to build static habitats in dynamic environments, or constructing habitat features that are ultimately overwhelmed by unconsidered system drivers.

[1]  G. Pess,et al.  Periphyton and invertebrate response to wood placement in large pacific coastal rivers , 2009 .

[2]  K. Jorde,et al.  Application of a hierarchical framework for assessing environmental impacts of dam operation: changes in streamflow, bed mobility and recruitment of riparian trees in a western North American river. , 2009, Journal of environmental management.

[3]  K. Jorde,et al.  Application of a hierarchical framework for assessing environmental impacts of dam operation: changes in hydrology, channel hydraulics, bed mobility and recruitment of riparian trees in a western North American river , 2009 .

[4]  T. Beechie,et al.  Hydrologic spiralling: the role of multiple interactive flow paths in stream ecosystems , 2008 .

[5]  Guillermo R. Giannico,et al.  Setting River Restoration Priorities: A Review of Approaches and a General Protocol for Identifying and Prioritizing Actions , 2008 .

[6]  T. Beechie,et al.  Global Review of the Physical and Biological Effectiveness of Stream Habitat Rehabilitation Techniques , 2008 .

[7]  T. Beechie,et al.  Channel incision, evolution and potential recovery in the Walla Walla and Tucannon River basins, northwestern USA , 2008 .

[8]  M. Perrow,et al.  Uncertainty Surrounding the Ecological Targets and Response of River and Stream Restoration , 2008 .

[9]  J. Wheaton,et al.  The Scope of Uncertainties in River Restoration , 2008 .

[10]  Chris E. Jordan,et al.  Geomorphic changes upstream of beaver dams in Bridge Creek, an incised stream channel in the interior Columbia River basin, eastern Oregon , 2007 .

[11]  D. Sear,et al.  Impacts of river restoration on small‐wood dynamics in a low‐gradient headwater stream , 2007 .

[12]  G. A. Thomas,et al.  Restoring Environmental Flows by Modifying Dam Operations , 2007 .

[13]  R. Palmer,et al.  Projected impacts of climate change on salmon habitat restoration , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[14]  J. Olden,et al.  Homogenization of regional river dynamics by dams and global biodiversity implications , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[15]  Christer Nilsson,et al.  Restoring freshwater ecosystems in riverine landscapes: the roles of connectivity and recovery processes , 2007 .

[16]  N. Bond,et al.  Linking ecological theory with stream restoration , 2007 .

[17]  J. Agee Restoring the Rivers , 2007 .

[18]  Hervé Piégay,et al.  Gravel bed rivers VI : from process understanding to river restoration , 2007 .

[19]  A. Large,et al.  ‘Natural’ rivers, ‘hydromorphological quality’ and river restoration: a challenging new agenda for applied fluvial geomorphology , 2006 .

[20]  E. Stanley,et al.  Process-Based Ecological River Restoration: Visualizing Three-Dimensional Connectivity and Dynamic Vectors to Recover Lost Linkages , 2006 .

[21]  R. Naiman,et al.  The challenge of providing environmental flow rules to sustain river ecosystems. , 2006, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[22]  D. Sear,et al.  The application of palaeohydrology in river management , 2006 .

[23]  Brian D. Richter,et al.  A collaborative and adaptive process for developing environmental flow recommendations , 2006 .

[24]  John L Stoddard,et al.  Setting expectations for the ecological condition of streams: the concept of reference condition. , 2005, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[25]  P. Shafroth,et al.  Defining ecosystem flow requirements for the Bill Williams River, Arizona , 2006 .

[26]  J. Kay,et al.  A Diagrammatic Approach to Understanding Complex Eco- Social Interactions in Kathmandu, Nepal , 2005 .

[27]  T. Barnett,et al.  Potential impacts of a warming climate on water availability in snow-dominated regions , 2005, Nature.

[28]  Larry MacDonnell,et al.  River restoration , 2005 .

[29]  H. Habersack,et al.  Historical analyses: A foundation for developing and evaluating river‐type specific restoration programs , 2005 .

[30]  A. Bednarek,et al.  MODIFYING DAM OPERATIONS TO RESTORE RIVERS: ECOLOGICAL RESPONSES TO TENNESSEE RIVER DAM MITIGATION , 2005 .

[31]  Katie A. Barnas,et al.  Synthesizing U.S. River Restoration Efforts , 2005, Science.

[32]  J. Syvitski,et al.  Impact of Humans on the Flux of Terrestrial Sediment to the Global Coastal Ocean , 2005, Science.

[33]  J. Meyer,et al.  Standards for ecologically successful river restoration , 2005 .

[34]  Francine M. R. Hughes,et al.  Restoring Riparian Ecosystems: The Challenge of Accommodating Variability and Designing Restoration Trajectories , 2005 .

[35]  F. Hauer,et al.  The shifting habitat mosaic of river ecosystems , 2005 .

[36]  A. Brooks,et al.  Experimental reintroduction of woody debris on the Williams River, NSW: geomorphic and ecological responses , 2004 .

[37]  Daniel R. Miller,et al.  The Network Dynamics Hypothesis: How Channel Networks Structure Riverine Habitats , 2004 .

[38]  R. Tharme A global perspective on environmental flow assessment: emerging trends in the development and application of environmental flow methodologies for rivers , 2003 .

[39]  S. Darby,et al.  The influence of vegetation and organic debris on flood-plain sediment dynamics: case study of a low-order stream in the New Forest, England , 2003 .

[40]  D. Montgomery,et al.  Patterns and processes of wood debris accumulation in the Queets river basin, Washington , 2003 .

[41]  M. Willson,et al.  Pacific Salmon in Aquatic and Terrestrial Ecosystems , 2002 .

[42]  R. E. Grift,et al.  Restoration strategies for river floodplains along large lowland rivers in Europe , 2002 .

[43]  S. Schmutz,et al.  Re‐establishing and assessing ecological integrity in riverine landscapes , 2002 .

[44]  K. Tockner,et al.  Riverine landscape diversity , 2002 .

[45]  D. Langill,et al.  An audit of small culvert installations in Nova Scotia: Habitat loss and habitat fragmentation , 2002 .

[46]  S. Railsback,et al.  Design and Performance of a Channel Reconstruction Project in a Coastal California Gravel-Bed Stream , 2001, Environmental management.

[47]  A. Brown,et al.  Late Holocene channel changes of the Middle Trent: channel response to a thousand-year flood record , 2001 .

[48]  Brian G. Wolff,et al.  Forecasting Agriculturally Driven Global Environmental Change , 2001, Science.

[49]  D. Hannah,et al.  Riparian vegetation and island formation along the gravel‐bed Fiume Tagliamento, Italy , 2001 .

[50]  L. B. Leopold,et al.  Attributes of an alluvial river and their relation to water policy and management. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[51]  G. Pess,et al.  Modeling Recovery Rates and Pathways for Woody Debris Recruitment in Northwestern Washington Streams , 2000 .

[52]  S. Pritchard,et al.  References Cited , 2000 .

[53]  Susan Bolton,et al.  An Approach to Restoring Salmonid Habitat‐forming Processes in Pacific Northwest Watersheds , 1999 .

[54]  D. Montgomery PROCESS DOMAINS AND THE RIVER CONTINUUM 1 , 1999 .

[55]  J. Karr Defining and measuring river health , 1999 .

[56]  J. Warda,et al.  BIODIVERSITY OF FLOODPLAIN RIVER ECOSYSTEMS: ECOTONES AND CONNECTIVITY , 1999 .

[57]  Klement Tockner,et al.  Biodiversity of floodplain river ecosystems: ecotones and connectivity1 , 1999 .

[58]  F. Hughes,et al.  Floodplain biogeomorphology , 1997 .

[59]  L. Benda,et al.  Stochastic forcing of sediment supply to channel networks from landsliding and debris flow , 1997 .

[60]  L. Benda,et al.  Stochastic forcing of sediment routing and storage in channel networks , 1997 .

[61]  R. Sparks,et al.  THE NATURAL FLOW REGIME. A PARADIGM FOR RIVER CONSERVATION AND RESTORATION , 1997 .

[62]  Charles C. Coutant,et al.  A GENERAL PROTOCOL FOR RESTORATION OF REGULATED RIVERS , 1996 .

[63]  D. Montgomery,et al.  Stream-bed scour, egg burial depths, and the influence of salmonid spawning on bed surface mobility and embryo survival , 1996 .

[64]  Paul R. Ehrlich,et al.  Human Appropriation of Renewable Fresh Water , 1996, Science.

[65]  Francisco Suárez,et al.  Permeability of roads and railways to vertebrates: The importance of culverts , 1995 .

[66]  C. Nilsson,et al.  Fragmentation and Flow Regulation of River Systems in the Northern Third of the World , 1994, Science.

[67]  Timothy J. Beechie,et al.  Estimating Coho Salmon Rearing Habitat and Smolt Production Losses in a Large River Basin, and Implications for Habitat Restoration , 1994 .

[68]  D. Sear River restoration and geomorphology , 1994 .

[69]  J. Connell Diversity in tropical rain forests and coral reefs. , 1978, Science.