Thermodynamics of T cell receptor binding to peptide-MHC: evidence for a general mechanism of molecular scanning.

Antigen-dependent activation of T lymphocytes requires T cell receptor (TCR)-mediated recognition of specific peptides, together with the MHC molecules to which they are bound. To achieve this recognition in a reasonable time frame, the TCR must scan and discriminate rapidly between thousands of MHC molecules differing from each other only in their bound peptides. Kinetic analysis of the interaction between a TCR and its cognate peptide-MHC complex indicates that both association and dissociation depend heavily on the temperature, indicating the presence of large energy barriers in both phases. Thermodynamic analysis reveals changes in heat capacity and entropy that are characteristic of protein-ligand associations in which local folding is coupled to binding. Such an "induced-fit" mechanism is characteristic of sequence-specific DNA-binding proteins that must also recognize specific ligands in the presence of a high background of competing elements. Here, we propose that induced fit may endow the TCR with its requisite discriminatory capacity and suggest a model whereby the loosely structured antigen-binding loops of the TCR rapidly explore peptide-MHC complexes on the cell surface until some critical structural complementarity is achieved through localized folding transitions. We further suggest that conformational changes, implicit in this model, may also propagate beyond the TCR antigen-binding site and directly affect self-association of ligated TCRs or TCR-CD3 interactions required for signaling.

[1]  S. Yoo,et al.  Thermodynamic study of the pH-dependent interaction of chromogranin A with an intraluminal loop peptide of the inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate receptor. , 1995, Biochemistry.

[2]  R C Stevens,et al.  Structural insights into the evolution of an antibody combining site. , 1997, Science.

[3]  M. Davis,et al.  Kinetic discrimination in T-cell activation. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[4]  W. DeGrado,et al.  Design of DNA-binding peptides based on the leucine zipper motif. , 1990, Science.

[5]  R. S. Spolar,et al.  Coupling of local folding to site-specific binding of proteins to DNA. , 1994, Science.

[6]  D. Wiley,et al.  Two human T cell receptors bind in a similar diagonal mode to the HLA-A2/Tax peptide complex using different TCR amino acids. , 1998, Immunity.

[7]  R. Poljak,et al.  Hydrogen bonding and solvent structure in an antigen-antibody interface. Crystal structures and thermodynamic characterization of three Fv mutants complexed with lysozyme. , 1996, Biochemistry.

[8]  J. Altman,et al.  Initiation of signal transduction through the T cell receptor requires the multivalent engagement of peptide/MHC ligands [corrected]. , 1998, Immunity.

[9]  P. Allen,et al.  Fidelity of T cell activation through multistep T cell receptor zeta phosphorylation. , 1998, Science.

[10]  Y. Chien,et al.  A TCR binds to antagonist ligands with lower affinities and faster dissociation rates than to agonists. , 1996, Immunity.

[11]  J. Ha,et al.  Role of the hydrophobic effect in stability of site-specific protein-DNA complexes. , 1989, Journal of molecular biology.

[12]  I. Wilson,et al.  Detailed analysis of the free and bound conformations of an antibody. X-ray structures of Fab 17/9 and three different Fab-peptide complexes. , 1993, Journal of molecular biology.

[13]  K. Tsumoto,et al.  Role of Salt Bridge Formation in Antigen-Antibody Interaction , 1996, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[14]  R. Willson,et al.  Isothermal titration calorimetric study of the association of hen egg lysozyme and the anti-lysozyme antibody HyHEL-5. , 1994, Biochemistry.

[15]  I. Wilson,et al.  Structural evidence for induced fit as a mechanism for antibody-antigen recognition. , 1994, Science.

[16]  Mark M. Davis,et al.  Ligand-specific oligomerization of T-cell receptor molecules , 1997, Nature.

[17]  Y. Chien,et al.  T cell receptor interaction with peptide/major histocompatibility complex (MHC) and superantigen/MHC ligands is dominated by antigen , 1993, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[18]  H. Goldberg,et al.  The DNA binding arm of lambda repressor: critical contacts from a flexible region. , 1991, Science.

[19]  J. Rothbard,et al.  Specific T cell recognition of minimally homologous peptides: evidence for multiple endogenous ligands. , 1995, Immunity.

[20]  E. Sercarz,et al.  Degenerate recognition of a dissimilar antigenic peptide by myelin basic protein-reactive T cells. Implications for thymic education and autoimmunity. , 1993, Journal of immunology.

[21]  L R Pease,et al.  Structural basis of plasticity in T cell receptor recognition of a self peptide-MHC antigen. , 1998, Science.

[22]  M. Davis,et al.  Expression of T cell antigen receptor heterodimers in a lipid-linked form. , 1990, Science.

[23]  N. Watanabe,et al.  Positive and negative thymocyte selection. , 1998, Critical reviews in immunology.

[24]  P. R. Sibbald,et al.  CDR3 length in antigen-specific immune receptors , 1994, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[25]  C. Chothia,et al.  Role of hydrophobicity in the binding of coenzymes. Appendix. Translational and rotational contribution to the free energy of dissociation. , 1978, Biochemistry.

[26]  T. Bhat,et al.  Bound water molecules and conformational stabilization help mediate an antigen-antibody association. , 1994, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[27]  T. McKeithan,et al.  Kinetic proofreading in T-cell receptor signal transduction. , 1995, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[28]  R L Stanfield,et al.  Major antigen-induced domain rearrangements in an antibody. , 1993, Structure.

[29]  M. Jackson,et al.  High-affinity reactions between antigen-specific T-cell receptors and peptides associated with allogeneic and syngeneic major histocompatibility complex class I proteins. , 1994, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[30]  N. Guex,et al.  SWISS‐MODEL and the Swiss‐Pdb Viewer: An environment for comparative protein modeling , 1997, Electrophoresis.

[31]  M C Peitsch,et al.  ProMod and Swiss-Model: Internet-based tools for automated comparative protein modelling. , 1996, Biochemical Society transactions.

[32]  K. P. Murphy,et al.  Configurational effects in antibody–antigen interactions studied by microcalorimetry , 1995, Proteins.

[33]  R. Bryan,et al.  The crystal structure of EcoRV endonuclease and of its complexes with cognate and non-cognate DNA fragments. , 1993 .

[34]  J. Altman,et al.  Formation of functional peptide complexes of class II major histocompatibility complex proteins from subunits produced in Escherichia coli. , 1993, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[35]  A V Finkelstein,et al.  The price of lost freedom: entropy of bimolecular complex formation. , 1989, Protein engineering.

[36]  J. Strominger,et al.  Molecular mimicry in T cell-mediated autoimmunity: Viral peptides activate human T cell clones specific for myelin basic protein , 1995, Cell.

[37]  Z Reich,et al.  Ligand recognition by alpha beta T cell receptors. , 1998, Annual review of immunology.

[38]  K. P. Murphy,et al.  Structural energetics of peptide recognition: Angiotensin II/antibody binding , 1993, Proteins.

[39]  B K Jakobsen,et al.  TCR binding to peptide-MHC stabilizes a flexible recognition interface. , 1999, Immunity.

[40]  A. Lanzavecchia,et al.  Serial triggering of many T-cell receptors by a few peptide–MHC complexes , 1995, Nature.