Hearing preservation surgery: psychophysical estimates of cochlear damage in recipients of a short electrode array.

In the newest implementation of cochlear implant surgery, electrode arrays of 10 or 20 mm are inserted into the cochlea with the aim of preserving hearing in the region apical to the tip of the electrode array. In the current study two measures were used to assess hearing preservation: changes in audiometric threshold and changes in psychophysical estimates of nonlinear cochlear processing. Nonlinear cochlear processing was evaluated at signal frequencies of 250 and 500 Hz using Schroeder phase maskers with various indices of masker phase curvature. A total of 15 normal-hearing listeners and 13 cochlear implant patients (7 with a 10 mm insertion and 6 with a 20 mm insertion) were tested. Following surgery the mean low-frequency threshold elevation was 12.7 dB (125-750 Hz). Nine patients had postimplant thresholds within 5-10 dB of preimplant thresholds. Only one patient, however, demonstrated a completely normal nonlinear cochlear function following surgery--although most retained some degree of residual nonlinear processing. This result indicates (i) that Schroeder phase masking functions are a more sensitive index of surgical trauma than audiometric threshold and (ii) that preservation of a normal cochlear function in the apex of the cochlea is relatively uncommon but possible.

[1]  D. McFadden,et al.  Reductions in overshoot during aspirin use. , 1990, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[2]  R. Carlyon,et al.  Excitation produced by Schroeder-phase complexes: evidence for fast-acting compression in the auditory system. , 1997, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[3]  V. Summers Overshoot effects using Schroeder-phase harmonic maskers in listeners with normal hearing and with hearing impairment , 2001, Hearing Research.

[4]  H. Levitt Transformed up-down methods in psychoacoustics. , 1971, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[5]  Sid P. Bacon,et al.  Psychophysical Manifestations of Compression: Normal-Hearing Listeners , 2004 .

[6]  S. Neely,et al.  A model for active elements in cochlear biomechanics. , 1986, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[7]  W. S. Rhode,et al.  Study of mechanical motions in the basal region of the chinchilla cochlea. , 2000, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[8]  René H. Gifford,et al.  Speech Recognition Materials and Ceiling Effects: Considerations for Cochlear Implant Programs , 2008, Audiology and Neurotology.

[9]  W. S. Rhode,et al.  Basilar membrane responses to broadband stimuli. , 2000, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[10]  Anna Piotrowska,et al.  Preservation of low frequency hearing in partial deafness cochlear implantation (PDCI) using the round window surgical approach , 2007, Acta oto-laryngologica.

[11]  Sid P. Bacon,et al.  Auditory Function and Speech Understanding in Listeners Who Qualify for EAS Surgery , 2007, Ear and hearing.

[12]  Bruce J. Gantz,et al.  Acoustic plus Electric Speech Processing: Preliminary Results of a Multicenter Clinical Trial of the Iowa/Nucleus Hybrid Implant , 2006, Audiology and Neurotology.

[13]  Manfred R. Schroeder,et al.  Synthesis of low-peak-factor signals and binary sequences with low autocorrelation (Corresp.) , 1970, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[14]  Jan Kiefer,et al.  Combined Electric and Acoustic Stimulation of the Auditory System: Results of a Clinical Study , 2005, Audiology and Neurotology.

[15]  Marjorie R. Leek,et al.  Psychophysical Estimates of Cochlear Phase Response: Masking by Harmonic Complexes , 2001, Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology.

[16]  S. P. Bacon,et al.  Overshoot in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired subjects. , 1992, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[17]  Jan Kiefer,et al.  Hearing preservation in cochlear implantation for electric acoustic stimulation , 2004, Acta oto-laryngologica.

[18]  B. Wilson,et al.  Speech Processors for Auditory Prostheses , 2001 .

[19]  A Kohlrausch,et al.  Phase effects in masking related to dispersion in the inner ear. II. Masking period patterns of short targets. , 1995, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[20]  A. Stuart,et al.  Test-retest variability in audiometric threshold with supraaural and insert earphones among children and adults. , 1991, Audiology : official organ of the International Society of Audiology.

[21]  V. Summers,et al.  Effects of hearing impairment and presentation level on masking period patterns for Schroeder-phase harmonic complexes. , 2000, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[22]  Jozef J. Zwislocki,et al.  Cochlear mechanisms of frequency and intensity coding. I. The place code for pitch , 1997, Hearing Research.

[23]  L. Rybak,et al.  Combined effects of adrenalectomy and noise exposure on compound action potentials, endocochlear potentials and endolymphatic potassium concentrations , 1995, Hearing Research.

[24]  Van Summers,et al.  Masking of tones and speech by Schroeder-phase harmonic complexes in normally hearing and hearing-impaired listeners , 1998, Hearing Research.

[25]  Bruce J Gantz,et al.  Combining acoustic and electrical hearing. , 2003, The Laryngoscope.

[26]  Torsten Dau,et al.  Masker phase effects in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners: evidence for peripheral compression at low signal frequencies. , 2004, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[27]  T Dau,et al.  Reconciling frequency selectivity and phase effects in masking. , 2001, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[28]  C. Luetje,et al.  Hybrid Cochlear Implantation: Clinical Results and Critical Review in 13 Cases , 2007, Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology.

[29]  R. Hartmann,et al.  Electric-Acoustic Stimulation of the Auditory System , 1999, ORL.

[30]  Hallowell Davis,et al.  An active process in cochlear mechanics , 1983, Hearing Research.

[31]  Anna Piotrowska,et al.  A new method of partial deafness treatment. , 2003, Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research.

[32]  Anna Piotrowska,et al.  Partial deafness cochlear implantation provides benefit to a new population of individuals with hearing loss , 2006, Acta oto-laryngologica.

[33]  Silke Helbig,et al.  Ipsilateral Electric Acoustic Stimulation of the Auditory System: Results of Long-Term Hearing Preservation , 2006, Audiology and Neurotology.

[34]  W Gstöttner,et al.  [Cochlear implantation with preservation of residual deep frequency hearing]. , 2005, HNO.

[35]  P. van de Heyning,et al.  Outcomes in adults implanted with the FLEXsoft electrode , 2007, Acta oto-laryngologica.

[36]  Bruce J Gantz,et al.  Combining acoustic and electrical speech processing: Iowa/Nucleus hybrid implant , 2004, Acta oto-laryngologica.

[37]  Joseph Roberson,et al.  Nucleus Freedom North American Clinical Trial , 2007, Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery.

[38]  Bruce J Gantz,et al.  Preservation of Hearing in Cochlear Implant Surgery: Advantages of Combined Electrical and Acoustical Speech Processing , 2005, The Laryngoscope.

[39]  W. Gstöttner,et al.  Kochleaimplantat mit Tieftonrestgehörerhalt , 2004, HNO.

[40]  G. E. Peterson,et al.  Revised CNC lists for auditory tests. , 1962, The Journal of speech and hearing disorders.

[41]  Chantal Laroche,et al.  Frequency selectivity in workers with noise-induced hearing loss , 1992, Hearing Research.