Metacognition in Taiwan: students' calibration of comprehension and performance.

Researchers have increasingly investigated the role played by metacognition in students' learning and performance. Metacognition is comprised of metacognitive knowledge and metacognitive experiences, and both components of metacognition are viewed as being important to learning and performance in academic settings. Metacognitive experiences involve, in part, students' awareness of progress on cognitive tasks. Such awareness is critical to learning, for students may fail to spend additional time reviewing or studying material if they believe they have understood the material adequately. In the present study we examined Taiwanese students' ability to assess their comprehension of passages following reading as well as their ability to predict the number of questions they would be able to answer about passage content. Following an actual test on the material, students were asked to assess how many questions they felt they answered correctly about a passage (postdiction). Students were able to predict comprehension and test performance at better than chance levels and were more accurate at postdiction than prediction. Students with better performance, as measured by comprehension test scores, were better at both prediction and postdiction of comprehension performance. However, students' self-assessments of general calibration ability did not relate to their test performance. The metacomprehension skills of Taiwanese students were quite similar to those previously found for western students, but also diverged in some respects.

[1]  Gregory Schraw,et al.  The Effect of Metacognitive Knowledge on Local and Global Monitoring , 1994 .

[2]  J. Flavell Metacognition and Cognitive Monitoring: A New Area of Cognitive-Developmental Inquiry. , 1979 .

[3]  K. Zabrucky,et al.  Calibration of Comprehension: Research and Implications for Education and Instruction. , 1998, Contemporary educational psychology.

[4]  A. Stacy,et al.  The Role of Metacognition in Learning Chemistry. , 2000 .

[5]  K. Zabrucky,et al.  Contributions of working memory and evaluation and regulation of understanding to adults' recall of texts. , 1994, Journal of gerontology.

[6]  Karen M. Zabrucky,et al.  AN ASSESSMENT OF STUDENTS' CALIBRATION OF COMPREHENSION AND CALIBRATION OF PERFORMANCE USING MULTIPLE MEASURES , 2001 .

[7]  Mary Lundeberg,et al.  Cultural influences on confidence : Country and gender , 2000 .

[8]  Ayanna K. Thomas,et al.  Metacomprehension for educationally relevant materials: Dramatic effects of encoding-retrieval interactions , 2007, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[9]  P. Pintrich The Role of Metacognitive Knowledge in Learning, Teaching, and Assessing , 2002 .

[10]  J. Dunlosky,et al.  Metacomprehension A Brief History and How to Improve Its Accuracy , 2007 .

[11]  David J. Therriault,et al.  Accuracy of metacognitive monitoring affects learning of texts. , 2003 .

[12]  S. Tobias,et al.  Knowing What You Know and What You Don't: Further Research on Metacognitive Knowledge Monitoring , 2002 .

[13]  Katherine A. Rawson,et al.  The rereading effect: Metacomprehension accuracy improves across reading trials , 2000, Memory & cognition.

[14]  L. Lawton,et al.  Blissful Ignorance: The Problem of Unrecognized Incompetence and Academic Performance , 2002 .

[15]  Douglas J. Hacker,et al.  The Influence of Overt Practice, Achievement Level, and Explanatory Style on Calibration Accuracy and Performance , 2005 .

[16]  B. Hout-Wolters,et al.  Metacognition and learning: conceptual and methodological considerations , 2006 .

[17]  R. Maki,et al.  The role of test anxiety in absolute and relative metacomprehension accuracy , 2007 .

[18]  Paul W. Grimes,et al.  The Overconfident Principles of Economics Student: An Examination of a Metacognitive Skill , 2002 .

[19]  Karen M. Zabrucky,et al.  METACOMPREHENSION AND COMPREHENSION PERFORMANCE IN YOUNGER AND OLDER ADULTS , 1997 .

[20]  R H Maki,et al.  The relationship between comprehension and metacomprehension ability , 1994, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[21]  Jennifer Wiley,et al.  Foundational Studies 1-1-2005 Understanding the Delayed-Keyword Effect on Metacomprehension Accuracy , 2013 .

[22]  John Dunlosky,et al.  What constrains the accuracy of metacomprehension judgments? Testing the transfer-appropriate-monitoring and accessibility hypotheses , 2005 .

[23]  David L. Ronis,et al.  Probability judgment accuracy: China, Japan, and the United States , 1989 .

[24]  Eleonora Papleontiou-louca,et al.  The concept and instruction of metacognition , 2003 .

[25]  D. Kuhn,et al.  Metacognition: A Bridge Between Cognitive Psychology and Educational Practice , 2004 .

[26]  Jennifer Wiley,et al.  Putting the Comprehension in Metacomprehension , 2005 .