SEARCH STRATEGIES OF A PURSUIT-DIVING MARINE BIRD AND THE PERSISTENCE OF PREY PATCHES

We explored foraging strategies used by marine animals to search for prey by examining the relative importance of information exchange and memory in a cold ocean environment from 1998 to 2000. Recent technological advances have increased our knowl- edge of the foraging patterns of marine predators, but few of these studies have concurrently measured prey distribution and behavior. We quantified the arrival and departure behavior of a pursuit-diving, colonial seabird, the Common Murre, Uria aalge, at two colonies on the eastern Newfoundland Shelf through observational techniques. We also measured the distribution, abundance, and behavior of the capelin, Mallotus villosus, the main prey species of murres, within foraging ranges of each colony, using hydroacoustic, vessel-based tech- niques. Return and departure flight directions of murres did not match at either colony during the same period. This indicated that murres departing colonies did not use infor- mation on prey distributions outside of visual range of the colony provided by the flight paths of returning flocks of birds to the colony carrying fish. High-abundance aggregations of capelin were reliably found within specific 2.25-km areas ("hot spots") for up to two weeks within the foraging ranges of murres from both colonies (-100 km). This circum- stance suggests that murres could use memory to locate hot spots on the coarse scale (1- 100 km) of foraging ranges from both colonies. Specific commuting routes (regular flight paths) of murres toward and away from hot spots were obvious at sea, and feeding murres consistently marked the location of capelin schools within hot spots. These distributions provided excellent conditions for murres to locate capelin schools on both coarse and fine (1-1000 m) scales by cueing to the activities of conspecifics, known as local enhancement. While central-place foraging from breeding colonies, murres likely use a mixture of memory and local enhancement to locate prey, depending on the spatial and temporal resolution of search and current prey conditions. Uncovering such behavioral mechanisms responsible for predator-prey interactions increases our understanding of linkages among trophic levels and, ultimately, ecosystem dynamics.

[1]  G. Pyke.  Optimal Foraging Theory: A Critical Review , 1984 .

[2]  C. Clark,et al.  Foraging and Flocking Strategies: Information in an Uncertain Environment , 1984, The American Naturalist.

[3]  N. Buckley.  Spatial‐Concentration Effects and the Importance of Local Enhancement in the Evolution of Colonial Breeding in Seabirds , 1997, The American Naturalist.

[4]  K. Mills.  Multispecies seabird feeding flocks in the Galápagos Islands , 1998 .

[5]  J. Piatt,et al.  Flexible time budgets in breeding Common Murres: Buffers against variable prey availability , 1990 .

[6]  W. Montevecchi,et al.  Signals from seabirds indicate changing biology of capelin stocks , 2003 .

[7]  Neil J. Buckley,et al.  FOOD FINDING AND THE INFLUENCE OF INFORMATION, LOCAL ENHANCEMENT, AND COMMUNAL ROOSTING ON FORAGING SUCCESS OF NORTH AMERICAN VULTURES , 1996 .

[8]  J. Piatt,et al.  Seasonal abundance and vertical distribution of capelin (Mallotus villosus) in relation to water temperature at a coastal site off eastern Newfoundland , 1991 .

[9]  S. Wanless,et al.  A comparison of feeding areas used by individual Common Murres (Uria aalge), Razorbills (Alca torda) and an Atlantic Puffin (Fratercula arctica) during the breeding season , 1990 .

[10]  D. K. Cairns,et al.  The Regulation of Seabird Colony Size: A Hinterland Model , 1989, The American Naturalist.

[11]  A. J. Gaston,et al.  The Thick-billed Murres of Prince Leopold Island--A Study of the Breeding Ecology of a Colonial High Arctic Seabird , 1983 .

[12]  Kjell Einar Erikstad,et al.  SCALE‐DEPENDENT PREDATOR–PREY INTERACTIONS: THE HIERARCHICAL SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION OF SEABIRDS AND PREY , 2000 .

[13]  B. Heinrich,et al.  Raven roosts are mobile information centres , 1996, Animal Behaviour.

[14]  Roost departure by European Starlings Sturnus vulgaris : effects of competition and choice of feeding site , 1995 .

[15]  C. Ryer,et al.  Information transfer and the facilitation and inhibition of feeding in a schooling fish , 1991, Environmental Biology of Fishes.

[16]  Donald J. Hall,et al.  The Role of Foraging Profitability and Experience in Habitat Use by the Bluegill Sunfish , 1981 .

[17]  G. Gudmundsson,et al.  FORAGING FLIGHTS OF BREEDING THICK-BILLED MURRES (URIA LOMVIA) AS REVEALED BY BIRD-BORNE DIRECTION RECORDERS , 1998 .

[18]  P. Wiebe,et al.  Patterns and Processes in the Time-Space Scales of Plankton Distributions , 1978 .

[19]  G. Hunt,et al.  FORAGING HABITAT AND PREY TAKEN BY LEAST AUKLETS AT KING ISLAND, ALASKA , 1990 .

[20]  Kevin Warburton,et al.  The use of local landmarks by foraging goldfish , 1990, Animal Behaviour.

[21]  David C. Schneider,et al.  The role of fluid dynamics in the ecology of marine birds , 1991 .

[22]  R. Furness,et al.  Basal metabolic rates of North Atlantic seabirds , 1995 .

[23]  A. Hedd,et al.  Foraging strategies of shy albatross Thalassarche cauta breeding at Albatross Island, Tasmania, Australia , 2001 .

[24]  Manfred Milinski,et al.  LONG-TERM MEMORY FOR FOOD PATCHES AND IMPLICATIONS FOR IDEAL FREE DISTRIBUTIONS IN STICKLEBACKS' , 1993 .

[25]  R. W. Russell,et al.  Foraging Radii and Energetics of Least Auklets (Aethia pusilla) Breeding on Three Bering Sea Islands , 1995, Physiological Zoology.

[26]  P. Monaghan.  Seabirds. Feeding Ecology and Role in Marine Ecosystems, J.P. Croxall (Ed.). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1987), viii , 1988 .

[27]  R. Veit.  BEHAVIOURAL RESPONSES BY FORAGING PETRELS TO SWARMS OF ANTARCTIC KRILL , 1999 .

[28]  Alan C. Kamil,et al.  Optimal Foraging Theory and the Psychology of Learning , 1983 .

[29]  George L. Hunt,et al.  Foraging in a fractal environment: Spatial patterns in a marine predator-prey system , 1992, Landscape Ecology.

[30]  J. Smith.  Foraging sociability of nesting wading birds (Ciconiiformes) at Lake Okeechobee, Florida , 1995 .

[31]  D. Clode,et al.  Colonially breeding seabirds: Predators or prey? , 1993, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[32]  E. Greene.  Individuals in an osprey colony discriminate between high and low quality information , 1987, Nature.

[33]  B. Heller.  Circular Statistics in Biology, Edward Batschelet. Academic Press, London & New York (1981), 371, Price $69.50 , 1983 .

[34]  Counting capelin: a comparison of acoustic density and trawl catchability , 2002 .

[35]  W. Montevecchi,et al.  Consequences of foraging trip duration on provisioning behaviour and fledging condition of common murres Uria aalgae , 2003 .

[36]  Kurt M. Fristrup,et al.  Geometry of visual recruitment by seabirds to ephemeral foraging flocks , 1992 .

[37]  J. Burger,et al.  Effects of Interference Competition on the Foraging Activity of Tropical Roseate Terns , 1993 .

[38]  G. Davoren,et al.  Differences in prey selection and behaviour during self-feeding and chick provisioning in rhinoceros auklets , 1999, Animal Behaviour.

[39]  JEFF P. Smith.  Foraging Flights and Habitat Use of Nesting Wading Birds (Ciconiiformes) at Lake Okeechobee, Florida , 1995 .

[40]  Gk Davoren.  Variability in foraging in response to changing prey distributions in rhinoceros auklets , 2000 .

[41]  C. Wiklund,et al.  Food information in the Black-headed Gull, Larus ridibundus , 1981, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[42]  R. Bayer.  HOW IMPORTANT ARE BIRD COLONIES AS INFORMATION CENTERS , 1982 .

[43]  W. C. Leggett,et al.  The importance of scale to predator-prey spatial correlations: an example of Atlantic fishes , 1990 .

[44]  H. Pöysä.  Group foraging in patchy environments: the importance of coarse-level local enhancement , 1992 .

[45]  A. Dhondt,et al.  How much memory do tits need? , 1997, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[46]  John A. Wiens,et al.  The Ecology of Seabird Feeding Flocks in Alaska , 1981 .

[47]  R. N. Hughes,et al.  Foraging Behaviour and Memory Window in Sticklebacks , 1995 .

[48]  Mark L. Tasker,et al.  Counting Seabirds at Sea from Ships: A Review of Methods Employed and a Suggestion for a Standardized Approach , 1984 .

[49]  J. Piatt.  The aggregative response of common murres and Atlantic puffins to schools of capelin , 1990 .

[50]  D. Grémillet.  Catch per unit effort, foraging efficiency, and parental investment in breeding great cormorants (Phalacrocorax carbo carbo) , 1997 .

[51]  J. Piatt,et al.  Allocation of Time and Energy FLEXIBLE TIME BUDGETS IN BREEDING COMMON MURRES: BUFFERS AGAINST VARIABLE PREY ABUNDANCE , 1990 .

[52]  W. Montevecchi,et al.  Energy expenditures, activity budgets, and prey harvest of breding common murres , 1990 .

[53]  Sara J. Shettleworth,et al.  Spatial memory in food-storing birds , 1990 .

[54]  L. Squire.  Memory and the hippocampus: a synthesis from findings with rats, monkeys, and humans. , 1992, Psychological review.

[55]  C. Ryer,et al.  Social mechanisms facilitating exploitation of spatially variable ephemeral food patches in a pelagic marine fish , 1992, Animal Behaviour.

[56]  D. Mock,et al.  Falsifiability and the Information Centre Hypothesis , 1988 .

[57]  C. M. Lessells,et al.  The Evolution of Life Histories , 1994 .

[58]  A. Zahavi.  The evolution of communal roosts as information centers and the pitfall of group selection: a rejoinder to Richner and Heeb , 1996 .

[59]  Alan E. Burger,et al.  Arrival and Departure Behavior of Common Murres at Colonies: Evidence for an Information Halo? , 1997 .

[60]  D. Irons.  FORAGING AREA FIDELITY OF INDIVIDUAL SEABIRDS IN RELATION TO TIDAL CYCLES AND FLOCK FEEDING , 1998 .

[61]  C. Harley,et al.  Hippocampal Volume Is Related to Complexity of Nesting Habitat in Leach’s Storm-Petrel, a Nocturnal Procellariiform Seabird , 1999, Brain, Behavior and Evolution.

[62]  R. Mcneil,et al.  Directions of arrivals of Great Blue Herons (Ardea herodias) at nests with large chicks near Montréal, Quebec , 1993 .

[63]  W. Montevecchi,et al.  Activity Budgets and Foraging Ranges of Breeding Common Murres , 1987 .

[64]  James F. Wittenberger.  Chapter 1 – THE ADAPTIVE SIGNIFICANCE OF COLONIALITY IN BIRDS , 1985 .

[65]  M. Hake,et al.  Avian flocking reduces starvation risk: an experimental demonstration , 1988, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[66]  C. Clark,et al.  The evolutionary advantages of group foraging , 1986 .

[67]  S. Rissing.  PREY PREFERENCES IN THE DESERT HORNED LIZARD: INFLUENCE OF PREY FORAGING METHOD AND AGGRESSIVE BEHAVIOR' , 1981 .