Utility of the Pentax-AWS without interruption of chest compression: comparison of the Macintosh laryngoscope with the Pentax-AWS in manikin model.

[1]  Y. Hirabayashi,et al.  Use of the Pentax-AWS® in 293 Patients with Difficult Airways , 2009, Anesthesiology.

[2]  E. Liu,et al.  Ease of intubation with the GlideScope or Airway Scope by novice operators in simulated easy and difficult airways – a manikin study * , 2009, Anaesthesia.

[3]  Dawn Dillman,et al.  Video Laryngoscopy with the Macintosh Video Laryngoscope in Simulated Prehospital Scenarios by Paramedic Students , 2009, Prehospital emergency care : official journal of the National Association of EMS Physicians and the National Association of State EMS Directors.

[4]  J. Laffey,et al.  Comparison of the Glidescope, the Pentax AWS, and the Truview EVO2 with the Macintosh laryngoscope in experienced anaesthetists: a manikin study. , 2009, British journal of anaesthesia.

[5]  W. Murray,et al.  Review of video laryngoscopy and rigid fiberoptic laryngoscopy , 2008, Current opinion in anaesthesiology.

[6]  J. Laffey,et al.  Comparison of Macintosh, Truview EVO2, Glidescope, and Airwayscope laryngoscope use in patients with cervical spine immobilization. , 2008, British journal of anaesthesia.

[7]  J. Henderson,et al.  The Pentax‐AWS® rigid indirect video laryngoscope: clinical assessment of performance in 320 cases * , 2008, Anaesthesia.

[8]  K. Tanigawa,et al.  Video laryngoscopy for emergency tracheal intubation during chest compression. , 2008, Resuscitation.

[9]  H. Lee,et al.  Comparison of the GlideScope video laryngoscope and Macintosh laryngoscope in simulated tracheal intubation scenarios , 2008, Emergency Medicine Journal.

[10]  Y. Okuda,et al.  Pentax-AWS, a new videolaryngoscope, is more effective than the Macintosh laryngoscope for tracheal intubation in patients with restricted neck movements: a randomized comparative study. , 2008, British journal of anaesthesia.

[11]  T. Kikuchi,et al.  Evaluation of the Airway Scope, a new video laryngoscope, in tracheal intubation by naive operators: a manikin study , 2007, Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica.

[12]  Y. Toyama,et al.  [Pentax-AWS improves laryngeal view compared with Macintosh blade during laryngoscopy and facilitates easier intubation]. , 2007, Masui. The Japanese journal of anesthesiology.

[13]  R. French,et al.  An evaluation of the GlideScope®, a new video laryngoscope for difficult airways: a manikin study , 2006, European journal of anaesthesiology.

[14]  T. Mort,et al.  Esophageal intubation with indirect clinical tests during emergency tracheal intubation: a report on patient morbidity. , 2005, Journal of clinical anesthesia.

[15]  E. Liu,et al.  Evaluation of ease of intubation with the GlideScope® or Macintosh laryngoscope by anaesthetists in simulated easy and difficult laryngoscopy * , 2005, Anaesthesia.

[16]  T. Mort,et al.  Emergency Tracheal Intubation: Complications Associated with Repeated Laryngoscopic Attempts , 2004, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[17]  R. Berg,et al.  Automated external defibrillation versus manual defibrillation for prolonged ventricular fibrillation: lethal delays of chest compressions before and after countershocks. , 2003, Annals of emergency medicine.

[18]  Wanchun Tang,et al.  Adverse Outcomes of Interrupted Precordial Compression During Automated Defibrillation , 2002, Circulation.

[19]  Robert A. Berg,et al.  Importance of Continuous Chest Compressions During Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation: Improved Outcome During a Simulated Single Lay-Rescuer Scenario , 2002, Circulation.

[20]  R. Berg,et al.  Chest compressions and basic life support-defibrillation. , 2001, Annals of emergency medicine.