An evaluation of web-based voting usability and accessibility

Several countries are considering web-based voting as an alternative to, or a replacement of, traditional voting methods. It is argued that electronic voting could increase voter participation and help strengthen democracy, as e-voting would increase accessibility for large sections of the population, particularly with regard to groups that previously have experienced difficulties with the traditional voting setup. With a focus on usability and accessibility, this paper reports on a study evaluating several electronic voting prototypes in Norway, involving technical aspects as well as expert evaluation and user testing in the field, with users from a wide range of disabled user groups participating in the study. Technical testing regarding accessibility standard compliance, testing with the personas method and user testing revealed that many rather basic universal design principles were either not fully understood or not prioritized for implementation by the solution providers. However, despite various accessibility difficulties, the participants generally showed a positive attitude towards web-based elections. Through the findings of this study, the authors highlight factors that are important to consider in the development and testing of web-based voting systems.

[1]  Jonathan Grudin,et al.  Personas, Participatory Design and Product Development: An Infrastructure for Engagement , 2002 .

[2]  Alan D. Smith.  Acceptability of internet voting and CRM principles among the internet savvy , 2008, Int. J. Bus. Inf. Syst..

[3]  Kristin Skeide Fuglerud.  ICT Services for Every Citizen: The Challenge of Gaps in User Knowledge , 2009, HCI.

[4]  Dag Svanæs,et al.  Validating WCAG versions 1.0 and 2.0 through usability testing with disabled users , 2012, Universal Access in the Information Society.

[5]  Jennifer Mankoff,et al.  Is your web page accessible?: a comparative study of methods for assessing web page accessibility for the blind , 2005, CHI.

[6]  Gregg C. Vanderheiden,et al.  Accessible design and testing in the application development process: considerations for an integrated approach , 2008, Universal Access in the Information Society.

[7]  Gregg C. Vanderheiden,et al.  Web content accessibility guidelines 1.0 , 2001, INTR.

[8]  Linda Little,et al.  E-Voting in an Ubicomp World , 2008 .

[9]  Benjamin B. Bederson,et al.  Electronic voting eliminates hanging chads but introduces new usability challenges , 2009, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[10]  Giampiero E. G. Beroggi.  Secure and Easy Internet Voting , 2008, Computer.

[11]  Priyanka Gupta,et al.  Universal access in e-voting for the blind , 2009, Universal Access in the Information Society.

[12]  Evangelos Vlachogiannis,et al.  Beyond Specifications: Towards a Practical Methodology for Evaluating Web Accessibility , 2010 .

[13]  Ghassan Z. Qadah,et al.  Electronic voting systems: Requirements, design, and implementation , 2007, Comput. Stand. Interfaces.

[14]  L Davidson,et al.  To vote or not to vote? , 1989, Nursing times.

[15]  Anders Lindgren,et al.  Using Personas and Scenarios as an Interface Design Tool for Advanced Driver Assistance Systems , 2007, HCI.

[16]  Julie A. Jacko,et al.  A systematic examination of universal design resources: part 2, analysis of the development process , 2007, Universal Access in the Information Society.

[17]  Hana Kopackova,et al.  Accessibility and findability of local e-government websites in the Czech Republic , 2010, Universal Access in the Information Society.

[18]  Yurong Yao,et al.  Remote electronic voting systems: an exploration of voters' perceptions and intention to use , 2007, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[19]  KenskiKate.  To I-Vote or Not to I-Vote? , 2005 .

[20]  Julie A. Jacko,et al.  A systematic examination of universal design resources: part 1, heuristic evaluation , 2008, Universal Access in the Information Society.

[21]  Klaus Kaasgaard,et al.  Comparative usability evaluation , 2004, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[22]  BriggsPam,et al.  E-Voting in an Ubicomp World , 2008 .

[23]  Ivar Solheim,et al.  Adaptive User Interfaces: Benefit or Impediment for Lower-Literacy Users? , 2009, HCI.

[24]  B. Shneiderman.  Promoting universal usability with multi-layer interface design , 2002, CUU '03.

[25]  Benjamin B. Bederson,et al.  The Importance of Usability Testing of Voting Systems , 2006, EVT.

[26]  Lothar Fritsch,et al.  Towards inclusive identity management , 2010 .

[27]  Bongshin Lee,et al.  Electronic voting system usability issues , 2003, CHI '03.

[28]  Michael D. Byrne,et al.  Usability of voting systems: baseline data for paper, punch cards, and lever machines , 2007, CHI.

[29]  John Seely Brown,et al.  Borderline Issues: Social and Material Aspects of Design , 1994, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[30]  Sharon J. Laskowski,et al.  Implications of Graphics on Usability and Accessibility for the Voter , 2009, VoteID.