The Appropriation of Interactive Technologies: Some Lessons from Placeless Documents

Appropriation is the process by which peopleadopt and adapt technologies, fitting them intotheir working practices. It is similar tocustomisation, but concerns the adoptionpatterns of technology and the transformationof practice at a deeper level. Understandingappropriation is a key problem for developinginteractive systems, since it critical to thesuccess of technology deployment. It is also animportant research issue, since appropriationlies at the intersection of workplace studiesand design.Most accounts of appropriation in the researchliterature have taken a social perspective. Incontrast, this paper explores appropriation interms of the technical features that supportit. Drawing examples from applicationsdeveloped as part of a novel documentmanagement system, it develops an initial setof design principles for appropriabletechnologies. These principles are particularlyrelevant to component-based approaches tosystem design that blur the traditionalapplication boundaries.

[1]  Wes Sharrock,et al.  The Production of Order and the Order of Production , 1997, ECSCW.

[2]  Shamkant B. Navathe,et al.  Information and Process Integration in Enterprises: Rethinking Documents , 1998 .

[3]  Lucy A. Suchman,et al.  Reflections on a Work-Oriented Design Project , 1996, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[4]  Susanne Bødker,et al.  From implementation to design: tailoring and the emergence of systematization in CSCW , 1994, CSCW '94.

[5]  Bonnie A. Nardi,et al.  Finding and reminding: file organization from the desktop , 1995, SGCH.

[6]  Lucy A. Suchman,et al.  Plans and Situated Actions: The Problem of Human-Machine Communication (Learning in Doing: Social, , 1987 .

[7]  Saul Greenberg.  Personalisable Groupware: Accommodating Individual Roles and Group Differences , 1991, ECSCW.

[8]  Janet Fulk,et al.  Organizations and Communication Technology , 1990 .

[9]  Victor Kaptelinin,et al.  Creating computer-based work environments: an empirical study of Macintosh users , 1996, SIGCPR '96.

[10]  Tom Rodden,et al.  Building bridges: customisation and mutual intelligibility in shared category management , 1999, GROUP.

[11]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Evolving the notes: organizational change around groupware technology , 1997 .

[12]  Lars Mathiassen,et al.  Computers and Design in Context , 2003 .

[13]  Paul Dourish,et al.  Accounting for system behavior: representation, reflection, and resourceful action , 1997 .

[14]  Ian Smith,et al.  Informing the design of an information management system with iterative fieldwork , 2000, DIS '00.

[15]  Allan MacLean,et al.  Crossing the Border: Document Coordination and the Integration of Processes in a Distributed Organisation , 1998 .

[16]  John Bowers,et al.  Workflow From Within and Without: Technology and Cooperative Work on the Print Industry Shopfloor , 1995, ECSCW.

[17]  Atul Prakash,et al.  Developing adaptive groupware applications using a mobile component framework , 2000, CSCW '00.

[18]  Prasun Dewan,et al.  Composable collaboration infrastructures based on programming patterns , 2000, CSCW '00.

[19]  BlombergJeanette,et al.  Reflections on a work-oriented design project , 1996 .

[20]  Lucy A. Suchman,et al.  Moving document collections online: The evolution of a shared repository , 1999, ECSCW.

[21]  Gerardine DeSanctis,et al.  Understanding the use of Group Decision Support Systems: The Theory of Adaptive Structuration , 1990 .

[22]  M. Grant,et al.  Communities of practice. , 2020, Health progress.

[23]  A. Kellerman,et al.  The Constitution of Society : Outline of the Theory of Structuration , 2015 .

[24]  Jonathan Grudin,et al.  Why Groupware Succeeds: Discretion or Mandate? , 1995, ECSCW.

[25]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Learning from Notes: organizational issues in groupware implementation , 1992, CSCW '92.

[26]  Frank M. Shipman,et al.  Formality Considered Harmful: Experiences, Emerging Themes, and Directions on the Use of Formal Representations in Interactive Systems , 1999, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).

[27]  Paul Dourish,et al.  Re-place-ing space: the roles of place and space in collaborative systems , 1996, CSCW '96.

[28]  Richard Bentley,et al.  Getting some perspective: using process descriptions to index document history , 1999, GROUP.

[29]  E. Wenger.  Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity , 1998 .

[30]  Thomas P. Moran,et al.  User-tailorable systems: pressing the issues with buttons , 1990, CHI '90.

[31]  Paul Dourish,et al.  Extending document management systems with user-specific active properties , 2000, TOIS.

[32]  Richard Bentley,et al.  Medium versus mechanism: Supporting collaboration through customisation , 1995, ECSCW.

[33]  Jonathan Grudin,et al.  Why CSCW applications fail: problems in the design and evaluationof organizational interfaces , 1988, CSCW '88.

[34]  Wendy E. Mackay,et al.  Patterns of sharing customizable software , 1990, CSCW '90.

[35]  Leysia Palen,et al.  Social, individual and technological issues for groupware calendar systems , 1999, CHI '99.

[36]  Madhu C. Reddy,et al.  Coordinating heterogeneous work: Information and representation in medical care , 2001, ECSCW.