Persistence of direction increases the drift velocity of run and tumble chemotaxis

Escherichia coli is a motile bacterium that moves up a chemoattractant gradient by performing a biased random walk composed of alternating runs and tumbles. Previous models of run and tumble chemotaxis neglect one or more features of the motion, namely (a) a cell cannot directly detect a chemoattractant gradient but rather makes temporal comparisons of chemoattractant concentration, (b) rather than being entirely random, tumbles exhibit persistence of direction, meaning that the new direction after a tumble is more likely to be in the forward hemisphere, and (c) rotational Brownian motion makes it impossible for an E. coli cell to swim in a straight line during a run. This paper presents an analytic calculation of the chemotactic drift velocity taking account of (a), (b) and (c), for weak chemotaxis. The analytic results are verified by Monte Carlo simulation. The results reveal a synergy between temporal comparisons and persistence that enhances the drift velocity, while rotational Brownian motion reduces the drift velocity.

[1]  C. Patlak Random walk with persistence and external bias , 1953 .

[2]  H. Berg,et al.  Chemotaxis in Escherichia coli analysed by Three-dimensional Tracking , 1972, Nature.

[3]  H. Berg,et al.  Temporal comparisons in bacterial chemotaxis. , 1986, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[4]  A. M. Roberts,et al.  Gravitaxis in motile micro-organisms: the role of fore–aft body asymmetry , 2002, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[5]  D. Koshland,et al.  Isolation, characterization and complementation of Salmonella typhimurium chemotaxis mutants. , 1975, Journal of molecular biology.

[6]  H. Berg Random Walks in Biology , 2018 .

[7]  D. Brown,et al.  Temporal stimulation of chemotaxis in Escherichia coli. , 1974, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[8]  F. Dahlquist,et al.  Statistical measures of bacterial motility and chemotaxis. , 1975, Journal of theoretical biology.

[9]  Howard C. Berg,et al.  Signal processing times in bacterial chemotaxis , 1982, Nature.

[10]  P. Gennes Chemotaxis: the role of internal delays , 2004, European Biophysics Journal.

[11]  H. Berg,et al.  Impulse responses in bacterial chemotaxis , 1982, Cell.

[12]  Damon A. Clark,et al.  The bacterial chemotactic response reflects a compromise between transient and steady-state behavior. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[13]  Radek Erban,et al.  From Signal Transduction to Spatial Pattern Formation in E. coli: A Paradigm for Multiscale Modeling in Biology , 2005 .

[14]  M. Schnitzer,et al.  Theory of continuum random walks and application to chemotaxis. , 1993, Physical review. E, Statistical physics, plasmas, fluids, and related interdisciplinary topics.