Faecal calprotectin testing in UK general practice: a retrospective cohort study using The Health Improvement Network database

Background Faecal calprotectin (FC) testing to detect inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) was recommended for use in UK general practice in 2013. The actual use of FC testing following the national recommendations is unknown. Aim To characterise the use of FC testing for IBD in UK general practice. Design and setting A retrospective cohort study of routine electronic patient records from The Health Improvement Network database from UK general practice. Method The study included 6 965 853 adult patients (aged ≥18 years), between 2006 and 2016. FC test uptake, the patients tested, and patient management following testing were characterised. Results A total of 17 027 patients had 19 840 FC tests recorded. The mean age of tested patients was 44.2 years. The first FC tests were documented in 2009. FC test use was still increasing in 2016. By 2016, 66.8% (n = 493/738) of practices had started FC testing. About one-fifth (20.7%, n = 1253/6051) of tests were carried out in patients aged ≥60 years. Only 7.8% (n = 473/6051) of the FC test records were preceded by symptoms eligible for FC testing. Only 3.1% (n = 1720/55 477) of patients with eligible symptoms have received FC testing since the national recommendations were published. There was only a small number of patients with symptoms, FC test, and a IBD diagnosis. In total, 71.3% (n = 1416/1987) of patients with a positive and 47.7% (n = 1337/2805) with a negative FC test were referred or further investigated. Conclusion Uptake of FC testing in clinical practice has been slow and inconsistent. The indication of non-compliance with national recommendations may suggest that these recommendations lack applicability to the general practice context.

[1]  S. Taylor-Phillips,et al.  The incidence and prevalence of inflammatory bowel disease in UK primary care: a retrospective cohort study of the IQVIA Medical Research Database , 2021, BMC Gastroenterology.

[2]  S. Taylor-Phillips,et al.  Test accuracy of faecal calprotectin for inflammatory bowel disease in UK primary care: a retrospective cohort study of the THIN data , 2021, BMJ Open.

[3]  S. Taylor-Phillips,et al.  Faecal calprotectin to detect inflammatory bowel disease: a systematic review and exploratory meta-analysis of test accuracy , 2019, BMJ Open.

[4]  J. Turvill,et al.  Evaluation of the clinical and cost-effectiveness of the York Faecal Calprotectin Care Pathway , 2018, Frontline Gastroenterology.

[5]  M. Regueiro,et al.  ACG Clinical Guideline: Management of Crohn’s Disease in Adults , 2018, The American Journal of Gastroenterology.

[6]  T. Ahmad,et al.  Faecal calprotectin effectively excludes inflammatory bowel disease in 789 symptomatic young adults with/without alarm symptoms: a prospective UK primary care cohort study , 2018, Alimentary pharmacology & therapeutics.

[7]  Evangelos Kontopantelis,et al.  Spatial distribution of clinical computer systems in primary care in England in 2016 and implications for primary care electronic medical record databases: a cross-sectional population study , 2018, BMJ Open.

[8]  S. Cross,et al.  Unrestricted faecal calprotectin testing performs poorly in the diagnosis of inflammatory bowel disease in patients in primary care , 2017, Journal of Clinical Pathology.

[9]  L. Peyrin-Biroulet,et al.  Crohn's disease , 2017, The Lancet.

[10]  R. Sood,et al.  Evaluation of a faecal calprotectin care pathway for use in primary care , 2016, Primary Health Care Research & Development.

[11]  A. Stallmach,et al.  Aktualisierte S3-Leitlinie – „Diagnostik und Therapie des Morbus Crohn“ 2014 , 2014, Zeitschrift für Gastroenterologie.

[12]  C. Clar,et al.  Faecal calprotectin testing for differentiating amongst inflammatory and non-inflammatory bowel diseases: systematic review and economic evaluation. , 2013, Health technology assessment.

[13]  P. Whiting,et al.  Systematic review and meta-analysis of the current evidence on the duration of protection by bacillus Calmette-Guérin vaccination against tuberculosis. , 2013, Health technology assessment.

[14]  P. Pavlidis,et al.  Diagnostic accuracy and clinical application of faecal calprotectin in adult patients presenting with gastrointestinal symptoms in primary care , 2013, Scandinavian journal of gastroenterology.

[15]  J. Williams,et al.  The national colonoscopy audit: a nationwide assessment of the quality and safety of colonoscopy in the UK , 2012, Gut.

[16]  A. Bourke,et al.  Generalisability of The Health Improvement Network (THIN) database: demographics, chronic disease prevalence and mortality rates. , 2011, Informatics in primary care.

[17]  Hadley Wickham,et al.  ggplot2 - Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis (2nd Edition) , 2017 .

[18]  E. Rogers,et al.  Diffusion of innovations , 1964, Encyclopedia of Sport Management.

[19]  Faecal Calprotectin in Primary Care as a Decision Diagnostic for Inflammatory Bowel Disease and Irritable Bowel Syndrome: https://www.nice.org.uk/.../endorsed-resource-consensus-paper- pdf-4595859614 , 2018 .

[20]  H. Tilg,et al.  3rd European Evidence-based Consensus on the Diagnosis and Management of Crohn’s Disease 2016: Part 1 Diagnosis and Medical Management , 2017, Journal of Crohn's & colitis.

[21]  Faecal calprotectin diagnostic tests for inflammatory diseases of the bowel , 2012 .

[22]  G. Melita,et al.  [Diagnosis and treatment of Crohn's disease]. , 2003, Il Giornale di chirurgia.