Design redundancy in agile and resilient humanitarian supply chains

This paper proposes a design redundancy framework for countering the risks inherent in humanitarian supply chains (SCs), particularly those operating in conflict zones. This framework deals with humanitarian SC design and risk management, drawing from literature on agility and resilience. The humanitarian SC operation directed by the logistics cluster in Yemen is analyzed using system dynamics simulation and network optimization. Real data is used as input to the models to create and five alternative SC designs which can be implemented depending on the current risks to the humanitarian SC. This constitutes the new concept of design redundancy, whereby humanitarian SC managers can analyse multiple alternative SC designs for humanitarian operations. Each design is fitted to a potential risk scenario which is likely to occur during that crisis. The approach developed empowers the decision-makers to ensure the continued flow of aid to beneficiaries despite disruption providing decision-making support for humanitarian SC managers and communication with donors.

[1]  Nezih Altay,et al.  OR/MS research in disaster operations management , 2006, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[2]  Alexandre Dolgui,et al.  The Ripple effect in supply chains: trade-off ‘efficiency-flexibility-resilience’ in disruption management , 2014 .

[3]  Zhijie Sasha Dong,et al.  Supplier selection and pre-positioning strategy in humanitarian relief , 2019, Omega.

[4]  R. Oloruntoba,et al.  Humanitarian aid : an agile supply chain? , 2006 .

[5]  Alexandre Dolgui,et al.  Integrated detection of disruption scenarios, the ripple effect dispersal and recovery paths in supply chains , 2019, Ann. Oper. Res..

[6]  M. Situm,et al.  The strategic view of supply chain management and its association with risk , 2017 .

[7]  Angappa Gunasekaran,et al.  Agility and resilience as antecedents of supply chain performance under moderating effects of organizational culture within the humanitarian setting: a dynamic capability view , 2018, Production Planning & Control.

[8]  A. Gunasekaran,et al.  The sustainable humanitarian supply chain design: agility, adaptability and alignment , 2016 .

[9]  Alexandre Dolgui,et al.  Low-Certainty-Need (LCN) supply chains: a new perspective in managing disruption risks and resilience , 2018, Int. J. Prod. Res..

[10]  Anisya S. Thomas,et al.  Logistics training: necessity or luxury? , 2005 .

[11]  Angappa Gunasekaran,et al.  Supply chain resilience: role of complexities and strategies , 2015 .

[12]  J. Goentzel,et al.  Models and metrics to assess humanitarian response capacity , 2016 .

[13]  Alexandre Dolgui,et al.  Ripple effect in the supply chain: an analysis and recent literature , 2018, Int. J. Prod. Res..

[14]  Boris V. Sokolov,et al.  Control and system-theoretic identification of the supply chain dynamics domain for planning, analysis and adaptation of performance under uncertainty , 2013, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[15]  Dmitry Ivanov,et al.  Optimization of network redundancy and contingency planning in sustainable and resilient supply chain resource management under conditions of structural dynamics , 2019, Annals of Operations Research.

[16]  Rameshwar Dubey,et al.  Drivers of Coordination in Humanitarian Relief Supply Chains , 2018 .

[17]  D. Ivanov Structural Dynamics and Resilience in Supply Chain Risk Management , 2017 .

[18]  D. Ivanov Revealing interfaces of supply chain resilience and sustainability: a simulation study , 2018, Int. J. Prod. Res..

[19]  Brian Maskell,et al.  The age of agile manufacturing , 2001 .

[20]  Dmitry Ivanov,et al.  Building resilience and managing post-disruption supply chain recovery: Lessons from the information and communication technology industry , 2019, Int. J. Inf. Manag..

[21]  Pinar Keskinocak,et al.  Pre-Positioning of Emergency Items for CARE International , 2011, Interfaces.

[22]  Angappa Gunasekaran,et al.  Disaster relief operations: past, present and future , 2019, Annals of Operations Research.

[23]  M. Christopher,et al.  An Integrated Model for the Design of Agile Supply Chains. , 2001 .

[24]  Alexandre Dolgui,et al.  Review of quantitative methods for supply chain resilience analysis , 2019, Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review.

[25]  D. Ivanov,et al.  Global Supply Chain and Operations Management , 2021, Springer Texts in Business and Economics.

[26]  Dmitry A. Ivanov,et al.  Disruption tails and revival policies: A simulation analysis of supply chain design and production-ordering systems in the recovery and post-disruption periods , 2019, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[27]  Rameshwar Dubey,et al.  Swift trust and commitment: The missing links for humanitarian supply chain coordination? , 2019, Ann. Oper. Res..

[28]  Dmitry Ivanov,et al.  Simulation-based ripple effect modelling in the supply chain , 2017, Int. J. Prod. Res..

[29]  Benjamin T. Hazen,et al.  Understanding risk management for intentional supply chain disruptions: risk detection, risk mitigation, and risk recovery , 2019, Ann. Oper. Res..

[30]  Dmitry Ivanov,et al.  A real-option approach to mitigate disruption risk in the supply chain , 2019, Omega.

[31]  Christoph H. Glock,et al.  Methods for mitigating disruptions in complex supply chain structures: a systematic literature review , 2020, Int. J. Prod. Res..

[32]  Alain Martel,et al.  Prepositioning emergency supplies to support disaster relief: a case study using stochastic programming , 2018, INFOR Inf. Syst. Oper. Res..

[33]  Luk N. Van Wassenhove,et al.  Humanitarian aid logistics: supply chain management in high gear , 2006, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[34]  Dmitry Ivanov,et al.  Simultaneous structural–operational control of supply chain dynamics and resilience , 2019, Ann. Oper. Res..

[35]  Dmitry Ivanov,et al.  Dual sourcing under supply disruption with risk-averse suppliers in the sharing economy , 2019, Int. J. Prod. Res..

[36]  M. Christopher,et al.  Building the Resilient Supply Chain , 2004 .