Segmental Phonology in Optimality Theory: Markedness, Segment Realization, and Locality in Spreading

An important goal of phonological theory has been the elucidation of "action at a distance." This term refers to processes, such as assimilations or dissimilations, in which the trigger segment and affected segment are not string-adjacent; there are segments that intervene, yet seem not to participate in the process. Transparency of this sort raises questions. How and why does it occur? What determines which segments, if any, will be transparent for a given process? The search for answers to such questions has been one of the important forces driving the elaboration of metrical and autosegmental representations. Consider the case of long-distance feature spreading, or harmony. It is well known that segments within a spreading domain may appear to be non-participants, transparent to the harmony process. Various strategies have been proposed to account for such cases of transparency. Within non-linear phonological frameworks, a property many approaches have in common is the preservation of locality by relativizing it to what might very generally be called a legitimate target: some notion "anchor," "projection," or "feature-bearing unit." Locality is obeyed so long as spreading does not skip such a legitimate target. Notable examples of this line of thinking include Goldsmith (1976[79]) and Clements (1980) on the notion "feature-bearing unit," Halle and Vergnaud (1978) on "projections" of features, Kiparsky (1981) on the notion "harmonic vowel," and Archangeli and Pulleyblank (1987; 1994) and Anderson and Ewen (1987) on the relativization of adjacency to prosodically or geometrically defined anchors. The basic idea is depicted in (1), where a feature F is linked to the elements T1 and T2, legitimate targets in some respect. Locality is not violated by the skipping of intervening , since lacks whatever property it is that grants legitimacy (e.g. it is not F-bearing, has the wrong prosodic status, or lacks a certain feature geometric node, see the references cited above). Equivalently, the elements T1 and T2 are adjacent for the purposes of F-spreading.

[1]  Kenneth L. Moll,et al.  A Cinefluorographic Investigation of Fricative Consonant-Vowel Coarticulation , 1971 .

[2]  AKINBIYI AKINLABI,et al.  Kalaḅarị vowel harmony , 1997 .

[3]  Michael Hammond,et al.  On deriving the well-formedness condition , 1988 .

[4]  Noam Chomsky,et al.  The Sound Pattern of English , 1968 .

[5]  James M. Scobbie,et al.  Attribute value phonology , 1991 .

[6]  Cheryl Cydney Zoll,et al.  Parsing Below the Segment in a Constraint-Based Framework , 1998 .

[7]  Patricia A. Shaw,et al.  CONSONANT HARMONY SYSTEMS: THE SPECIAL STATUS OF CORONAL HARMONY , 1991 .

[8]  P. Ladefoged A course in phonetics , 1975 .

[9]  John-Dongwook Choi,et al.  WPP, No. 82: Phonetic Underspecification and Target Interpolation: An Acoustic Study of Marshallese Vowel Allophony , 1992 .

[10]  John J. McCarthy,et al.  Formal Problems in Semitic Phonology and Morphology , 2018 .

[11]  Louis Goldstein,et al.  Towards an articulatory phonology , 1986, Phonology.

[12]  G. W. Hughes,et al.  Spectral Properties of Fricative Consonants , 1956 .

[13]  C. Douglas Johnson,et al.  Formal Aspects of Phonological Description , 1972 .

[14]  Stephen R. Anderson,et al.  Problems and Perspectives in the Description of Vowel Harmony , 1980 .

[15]  C. Fowler Converging sources of evidence on spoken and perceived rhythms of speech: cyclic production of vowels in monosyllabic stress feet. , 1983, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[16]  Carole Paradis,et al.  On coronal transparency , 1989, Phonology.

[17]  Luigi Burzio Principles of English Stress , 1995 .

[18]  John T. Jensen,et al.  Ordering and directionality of iterative rules , 1973 .

[19]  John Coleman,et al.  The “no crossing constraint” in autosegmental phonology , 1991 .

[20]  Gunnar Fant,et al.  Acoustic Theory Of Speech Production , 1960 .

[21]  J. McCarthy Extensions of faithfulness: Rotuman revisited , 1995 .

[22]  Douglas Pulleyblank,et al.  Neutral Vowels in Optimality Theory: A Comparison of Yoruba and Wolof , 1996, Canadian Journal of Linguistics/Revue canadienne de linguistique.

[23]  C. Browman,et al.  Papers in Laboratory Phonology: Tiers in articulatory phonology, with some implications for casual speech , 1990 .

[24]  Nikolaj Sergejevič Trubeckoj Grundzüge der Phonologie , 1989 .

[25]  B. Lindblom,et al.  Numerical Simulation of Vowel Quality Systems: The Role of Perceptual Contrast , 1972 .

[26]  Laura Benua Identity Effects in Morphological Truncation , 1995 .

[27]  Anatole V. Lyovin,et al.  An introduction to the languages of the world , 1997 .

[28]  Alan S. Prince,et al.  Faithfulness and reduplicative identity , 1995 .

[29]  Charles W. Kisseberth,et al.  Topics in phonological theory , 1977 .

[30]  Joseph S. Perkell,et al.  Coarticulation strategies: preliminary implications of a detailed analysis of lower lip protrusion movements , 1986, Speech Commun..

[31]  S. Boyce Coarticulatory organization for lip rounding in Turkish and English. , 1990, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[32]  Morris Halle,et al.  Phonology in Generative Grammar , 1962 .

[33]  Peter Ladefoged,et al.  Phonetic Structures of Scottish Gaelic , 1998, Journal of the International Phonetic Association.

[34]  J. McCarthy OCP effects: Gemination and antigemination , 1986 .

[35]  Ewan Klein,et al.  Phonological events , 1990, Journal of Linguistics.

[36]  Jaye Padgett,et al.  Contrast Dispersion and Russian Palatalization , 2002 .

[37]  S. Öhman Coarticulation in VCV Utterances: Spectrographic Measurements , 1966 .

[38]  M. Guerssel Glides in Berber and syllabicity , 1986 .

[39]  John‐Dongwook Choi,et al.  An acoustic study of Kabardian vowels , 1991, Journal of the International Phonetic Association.

[40]  Irwin Howard,et al.  A directional theory of rule application in phonology , 1972 .

[41]  Stefan A. Frisch,et al.  Similarity and Frequency in Phonology , 1996 .

[42]  M. Kenstowicz Base-Identity and Uniform Exponence: Alternatives to Cyclicity , 1995 .

[43]  David Odden,et al.  ADJACENCY PARAMETERS IN PHONOLOGY , 1994 .

[44]  Robert Kirchner,et al.  Contrastiveness and faithfulness , 1997, Phonology.

[45]  S. Anderson The Organization of Phonology , 1974 .

[46]  Paul Kiparsky,et al.  Some consequences of Lexical Phonology , 1985, Phonology Yearbook.

[47]  P. Ladefoged,et al.  The sounds of the world's languages , 1996 .

[48]  John Local,et al.  Disentangling Autosegments from Prosodies: A Note on the Misrepresentation of a Research Tradition in Phonology. , 1994 .

[49]  Wendy Linker WPP, No. 56: Articulatory and Acoustic Correlates of Labial Activity in Vowels: A Cross-linguistic Study , 1982 .

[50]  Bernard Comrie,et al.  The Languages of the Soviet Union , 1981 .

[51]  Julie Levin A metrical theory of syllabicity , 1985 .

[52]  J. C. Catford,et al.  A practical introduction to phonetics , 1988 .

[53]  Adamantios I. Gafos,et al.  The Articulatory Basis of Locality in Phonology , 1999 .

[54]  Rachel Walker,et al.  Long-distance Consonantal Identity Effects , 2000 .

[55]  Charles Kisseberth,et al.  Nasal Harmony in Optimal Domains Theory , 1994 .

[56]  René Kager,et al.  Surface opacity of metrical structure in optimality theory , 1999 .

[57]  J. Padgett,et al.  Stricture in Feature Geometry , 1995 .

[58]  Edward Flemming,et al.  Auditory Representations in Phonology , 2002 .

[59]  George N. Clements,et al.  Vowel harmony in nonlinear generative phonology : an autosegmental model : 1976 version , 1980 .

[60]  E Farnetani,et al.  Coarticulation in Italian /VtV/ Sequences: A Palatographic Study , 1985, Phonetica.

[61]  W. S. Allen Some Prosodic Aspects of Retroflexion and Aspiration in Sanskrit , 1951, Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies.

[62]  Michael Kenstowicz,et al.  Cyclic vs. non-cyclic constraint evaluation , 1995, Phonology.

[63]  Naralie Waterson,et al.  Some Aspects of the Phonology of the Norminal Forms of the Turkish Word , 1956 .

[64]  John M. Anderson,et al.  Principles of Dependency Phonology , 1987 .

[65]  B. Lindblom Phonetic Universals in Vowel Systems , 1986 .

[66]  Moira Yip,et al.  Feature geometry and cooccurrence restrictions , 1989, Phonology.