Predicting runoff from Rangeland Catchments: A comparison of two models

This is a comparison of two very different hydrology models, both designed to predict runoff from ungaged rural catchments. One is the commonly used and conceptually simple Soil Conservation Service curve number method. The other is a process oriented model based on the Green and Ampt equation. The Green and Ampt model employs newly developed techniques for parameterizing the Green and Ampt equation based on readily available soil and vegetation information. Annual, monthly and daily predicted runoff were compared to observed on six uncalibrated rangeland catchments located in Texas, Oklahoma, Arizona, Nebraska and Idaho. Model parameterization was based strictly on individual catchment characteristics. No model calibration was performed. Results indicate that the Green and Ampt model is a potentially useful tool for predicting runoff. These results are important because they demonstrate the utility of complex physically based models as management tools for predicting land use impacts to runoff and infiltration.

[1]  M. R. Savabi,et al.  Infiltration parameters for rangeland soils. , 1989 .

[2]  C. W. Richardson,et al.  Hydrologic Effects of Brush Control on Texas Rangelands , 1979 .

[3]  David A. Woolhiser,et al.  Disaggregation of daily rainfall , 1987 .

[4]  D. L. Brakensiek,et al.  Estimating Soil Water Retention from Soil Properties , 1982 .

[5]  C. T. Haan,et al.  Hydrologic modeling of small watersheds , 1982 .

[6]  R. McCuen,et al.  Statistical analysis of the Brooks-Corey and the Green-Ampt parameters across soil textures , 1981 .

[7]  SAGEBRUSH RANGELAND HYDROLOGY AND EVALUATION OF THE SPUR HYDROLOGY MODEL1 , 1989 .

[8]  James C. I. Dooge,et al.  Looking for hydrologic laws , 1986 .

[9]  D. L. Brakensiek,et al.  An Infiltration Based Runoff Model for a Standardized 24-Hour Rainfall , 1982 .

[10]  C. T. Haan.  Parametric Uncertainty in Hydrologic Modeling , 1989 .

[11]  W. J. Rawls,et al.  A procedure to predict green and ampt infiltration parameters , 1983 .

[12]  J. Nash,et al.  River flow forecasting through conceptual models part I — A discussion of principles☆ , 1970 .

[13]  C. A. Onstad,et al.  Parameter estimation of the Green and Ampt Infiltration Equation , 1977 .

[14]  Infiltration and runoff predictions for a grassland watershed , 1983 .

[15]  P. Kitanidis,et al.  Real‐time forecasting with a conceptual hydrologic model: 2. Applications and results , 1980 .

[16]  Keith Beven,et al.  Changing ideas in hydrology — The case of physically-based models , 1989 .

[17]  D. L. Brakensiek,et al.  Agricultural Management Effects on Soil Water Processes Part II: Green and Ampt Parameters for Crusting Soils , 1983 .

[18]  George M. Hornberger,et al.  Estimating spatial variability in soil moisture with a simplified dynamic model , 1983 .

[19]  R. Allan Freeze,et al.  A Comparison of Rainfall-Runoff Modeling Techniques on Small Upland Catchments , 1985 .

[20]  R. Hawkins.  Effects of Rainfall Intensity on Runoff Curve Numbers , 1978 .

[21]  Shu Tung Chu,et al.  Infiltration during an unsteady rain , 1978 .

[22]  W. J. Rawls,et al.  Determining the saturated hydraulic conductivity of a soil containing rock fragments , 1986 .

[23]  G. Gifford,et al.  Using the Green and Ampt infiltration equation on native and plowed rangeland soils. , 1988 .

[24]  Robert E. Rallison,et al.  Origin and Evolution of the SCS Runoff Equation , 1980 .

[25]  W. H. Blackburn,et al.  Hydrologic characteristics of vegetation types as affected by livestock grazing systems, Edwards Plateau, Texas. , 1986 .

[26]  W. Rawls,et al.  Prediction of soil water properties for hydrologic modeling , 1985 .

[27]  Keith Beven,et al.  Surface Water Hydrology-Runoff Generation and Basin Structure (Paper 2R1977) , 1983 .