Contribution of area-based fisheries management measures to fisheries sustainability and marine conservation: a global scoping review

[1]  A. Himes‐Cornell,et al.  OECMs in marine capture fisheries: Key implementation issues of governance, management, and biodiversity , 2022, Frontiers in Marine Science.

[2]  A. Himes‐Cornell,et al.  Reaching Global Marine Biodiversity Conservation Goals With Area-Based Fisheries Management: A Typology-Based Evaluation , 2022, Frontiers in Marine Science.

[3]  R. Hilborn,et al.  Trawl impacts on the relative status of biotic communities of seabed sedimentary habitats in 24 regions worldwide , 2022, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[4]  Martin A. Nuñez,et al.  A solution for breaking the language barrier. , 2021, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[5]  S. Unger,et al.  Contributions of marine area-based management tools to the UN sustainable development goals , 2021, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[6]  B. Misra,et al.  Ten tips for overcoming language barriers in science , 2021, Nature Human Behaviour.

[7]  R. Hilborn,et al.  Global status of groundfish stocks , 2021, Fish and Fisheries.

[8]  E. Mayo-Wilson,et al.  The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews , 2021, BMJ.

[9]  Christopher M. Anderson,et al.  Identifying management actions that promote sustainable fisheries , 2021, Nature Sustainability.

[10]  S. Katsanevakis,et al.  Eight years of BioInvasions Records: patterns and trends in alien and cryptogenic species records , 2021, Management of Biological Invasions.

[11]  R. Devillers,et al.  Benefits and gaps in area-based management tools for the ocean Sustainable Development Goal , 2020, Nature Sustainability.

[12]  M. Kraan,et al.  Marine recreational fisheries — current state and future opportunities , 2020 .

[13]  M. Coll,et al.  A review of the combined effects of climate change and other local human stressors on the marine environment. , 2020, The Science of the total environment.

[14]  B. Halpern.  Building on a Decade of the Ocean Health Index , 2020 .

[15]  R. Hilborn,et al.  Choosing best practices for managing impacts of trawl fishing on seabed habitats and biota , 2019, Fish and Fisheries.

[16]  Iucn Wcpa Task Force on OECMs.  Recognising and reporting other effective area-based conservation measures , 2019 .

[17]  P Huston,et al.  Reaping the benefits of Open Data in public health. , 2019, Canada communicable disease report = Releve des maladies transmissibles au Canada.

[18]  Neal R. Haddaway,et al.  EviAtlas: a tool for visualising evidence synthesis databases , 2019, Environmental Evidence.

[19]  Wolf-Christian Lewin,et al.  Potential Environmental Impacts of Recreational Fishing on Marine Fish Stocks and Ecosystems , 2019, Reviews in Fisheries Science & Aquaculture.

[20]  M. Coll,et al.  An operational framework to assess the value of fisheries restricted areas for marine conservation , 2019, Marine Policy.

[21]  R. Arlinghaus,et al.  The future of recreational fisheries: Advances in science, monitoring, management, and practice , 2019, Fisheries Research.

[22]  K. Hyder,et al.  What constitutes effective governance of recreational fisheries?—A global review , 2019 .

[23]  E. Molenaar,et al.  Strengthening International Fisheries Law in an Era of Changing Oceans , 2019 .

[24]  O. R. Eigaard,et al.  Bottom trawl fishing footprints on the world’s continental shelves , 2018, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[25]  The State of World Fisheries and Aquaculture 2020 , 2018, The State of World Fisheries and Aquaculture.

[26]  Claire L. Szostek,et al.  Response of benthic fauna to experimental bottom fishing: A global meta‐analysis , 2018 .

[27]  S. Kark,et al.  Biological Invasions in Conservation Planning: A Global Systematic Review , 2018, Front. Mar. Sci..

[28]  Alf Ring Kleiven,et al.  Recreational sea fishing in Europe in a global context-Participation rates, fishing effort, expenditure, and implications for monitoring and assessment , 2018 .

[29]  A. Páez,et al.  Grey literature: An important resource in systematic reviews. , 2017, Journal of evidence-based medicine.

[30]  Claire L. Szostek,et al.  Global analysis of depletion and recovery of seabed biota after bottom trawling disturbance , 2017, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[31]  R. Hilborn,et al.  Indirect effects of bottom fishing on the productivity of marine fish , 2017 .

[32]  Megan Nuspl,et al.  Grey literature in systematic reviews: a cross-sectional study of the contribution of non-English reports, unpublished studies and dissertations to the results of meta-analyses in child-relevant reviews , 2017, BMC Medical Research Methodology.

[33]  S. Griffiths,et al.  Quantifying subjective human dimensions of recreational fishing: does good health come to those who bait? , 2017 .

[34]  W. Sutherland,et al.  Languages Are Still a Major Barrier to Global Science , 2016, PLoS biology.

[35]  Yong Chen,et al.  The efficacy of fisheries closure in rebuilding depleted stocks: Lessons from size-spectrum modeling , 2016 .

[36]  C. Möllmann,et al.  Marine regime shifts around the globe: theory, drivers and impacts , 2015, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[37]  Sarah P. Bellefontaine,et al.  Between Black and White: Examining Grey Literature in Meta-analyses of Psychological Research , 2013, Journal of Child and Family Studies.

[38]  Dwayne Van Eerd,et al.  Searching for grey literature for systematic reviews: challenges and benefits , 2014, Research synthesis methods.

[39]  W. Sutherland,et al.  Seventy-One Important Questions for the Conservation of Marine Biodiversity , 2014, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[40]  Michael Hoyler,et al.  Global geographies of higher education: The perspective of world university rankings , 2013 .

[41]  J. Phillipson,et al.  Science for sustainable fisheries management: An interdisciplinary approach , 2013 .

[42]  Cleo Pappas,et al.  Grey Literature: Its Emerging Importance , 2011 .

[43]  D. Levac,et al.  Scoping studies: advancing the methodology , 2010, Implementation science : IS.

[44]  U. R. Sumaila,et al.  A global estimate of benefits from ecosystem-based marine recreation: potential impacts and implications for management , 2010 .

[45]  W. Edeson,et al.  Promoting Sustainable Fisheries , 2010 .

[46]  F. Song,et al.  Dissemination and publication of research findings: an updated review of related biases. , 2010, Health technology assessment.

[47]  R. Hilborn,et al.  Rebuilding Global Fisheries , 2009, Science.

[48]  Daniel Pauly,et al.  Funding Priorities: Big Barriers to Small‐Scale Fisheries , 2008, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[49]  Carrie V. Kappel,et al.  A Global Map of Human Impact on Marine Ecosystems , 2008, Science.

[50]  H. Keith,et al.  Global scope and economics of illegal fishing , 2006 .

[51]  Paul J. Somerfield,et al.  Global analysis of response and recovery of benthic biota to fishing , 2006 .

[52]  M. P. Cummings,et al.  Data sharing in ecology and evolution. , 2005, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[53]  H. Arksey,et al.  Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework , 2005 .

[54]  H. Cooper,et al.  Grey Literature in Meta-Analyses , 2003, Nursing research.

[55]  B. Worm,et al.  Rapid worldwide depletion of predatory fish communities , 2003, Nature.

[56]  T. Pitcher,et al.  Estimating illegal and unreported catches from marine ecosystems: a basis for change , 2002 .

[57]  Jeremy S. Collie,et al.  Modification of marine habitats by trawling activities: prognosis and solutions , 2002 .

[58]  K. Dickersin.  The existence of publication bias and risk factors for its occurrence. , 1990, JAMA.