Objective and subjective evaluations of quality for speckle reduced echocardiography

This paper presents the results of a study into the subjective effect of speckle reduction filtering in echocardiography, as assessed by clinical experts. Echocardiographic videos were filtered by a number of speckle reduction methods to produce a set of test videos with varying levels of speckle content. Six practicing cardiac technicians were asked to rate each video in three scoring categories, with the aim of quantifying their subjective evaluation of the diagnostic usefulness and the level of speckle in each video. The change in expert scores due to filtering is analyzed. Inter-expert difference in the evaluation is investigated, and intra-expert analysis of the association between each score category is also performed. In addition, a number of objective quality metrics are applied to the filtered videos, and the correlation between these metrics and the expert scores is determined. Results indicate that, while there are inter-expert differences, strong intra-expert relationships exist between the score categories. Furthermore each of the three subjective score categories is strongly associated with one of the objective quality metrics.

[1]  Joachim Weickert,et al.  Anisotropic diffusion in image processing , 1996 .

[2]  L. Pourcelot,et al.  Contrast enhanced ultrasound image segmentation based on fuzzy competitive clustering and anisotropic diffusion , 2004, The 26th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[3]  Olivier Basset,et al.  Spatial anisotropic diffusion and local time correlation applied to segmentation of vessels in ultrasound image sequences , 2003, IEEE Symposium on Ultrasonics, 2003.

[4]  Yasser M. Kadah,et al.  Real-time speckle reduction and coherence enhancement in ultrasound imaging via nonlinear anisotropic diffusion , 2002, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[5]  Scott T. Acton,et al.  Speckle reducing anisotropic diffusion , 2002, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[6]  Jitendra Malik,et al.  Scale-Space and Edge Detection Using Anisotropic Diffusion , 1990, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[7]  Vicent Caselles,et al.  Texture-Oriented Anisotropic Filtering and Geodesic Active Contours in Breast Tumor Ultrasound Segmentation , 2007, Journal of Mathematical Imaging and Vision.

[8]  Andrew F. Laine,et al.  Speckle reduction and contrast enhancement of echocardiograms via multiscale nonlinear processing , 1998, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[9]  Robert Rohling,et al.  Ultrasound image segmentation using spectral clustering. , 2005, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[10]  I.E. Abdou,et al.  Quantitative design and evaluation of enhancement/thresholding edge detectors , 1979, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[11]  Stéphane Mallat,et al.  Characterization of Signals from Multiscale Edges , 2011, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[12]  J C Bamber,et al.  Adaptive filtering for reduction of speckle in ultrasonic pulse-echo images. , 1986, Ultrasonics.

[13]  C.P. Loizou,et al.  Comparative evaluation of despeckle filtering in ultrasound imaging of the carotid artery , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[14]  John W. Clark,et al.  Nonlinear multiscale wavelet diffusion for speckle suppression and edge enhancement in ultrasound images , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[15]  Aleksandra Pizurica,et al.  A versatile wavelet domain noise filtration technique for medical imaging , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[16]  C. Burckhardt.  Speckle in ultrasound B-mode scans , 1978, IEEE Transactions on Sonics and Ultrasonics.

[17]  John F. Canny,et al.  A Computational Approach to Edge Detection , 1986, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.