Early course and grade predictors of persistence in undergraduate engineering majors

A comprehensive examination of the mathematics courses undergraduate engineering majors take in their first two years, and their success in those courses was conducted to determine the impact of course level and grade on student persistence in engineering. Six hundred fifty five, full-time freshmen enrolled as engineering majors at a major university in the Southwest United States participated in the study. Data was gathered from the 2007 freshman cohort. Students' grades for each of their first University mathematics courses were tracked, and used to gauge probabilities of subsequently persisting as an enrolled Engineering major. Participants were grouped into 9 categories representing 3 levels of course grade (A or B; C; and D, F, or W), crossed with 3 levels of course (Below Calculus I, Calculus I, and Above Calculus I). Student enrollment and graduation rates for each of these groups were examined for the next 5 years. A binary logistic regression with two main effects (Course and Grade) and one interaction was performed. Results show that if a student's first course was above Calculus I, they were 2.3 times more likely to be retained in Engineering than a student who took Calculus I. If a student took Pre-calculus or another course below Calculus I they were less than half as likely to persist in Engineering than those who took Calculus I (p<;.001). Likewise, if a student received an A or B for their first mathematics course regardless of which course they took, they were 6.5 times more likely to persist than someone who received a D, F, or W in their first mathematics course (p<; 0.001). The special role of Calculus as a gatekeeper, preventing engineering-intending students from obtaining an engineering degree, is discussed.

[1]  Adam V. Maltese,et al.  Pipeline persistence: Examining the association of educational experiences with earned degrees in STEM among U.S. students , 2011 .

[2]  E. Seymour,et al.  Talking About Leaving: Why Undergraduates Leave The Sciences , 1997 .

[3]  D. Gabard,et al.  Race , 1998, Encyclopedia of the UN Sustainable Development Goals.

[4]  Rose M. Marra,et al.  Leaving Engineering: A Multi‐Year Single Institution Study , 2012 .

[5]  Helen L. Chen,et al.  Outcomes of a Longitudinal Administration of the Persistence in Engineering Survey , 2010 .

[6]  Vincent Tinto,et al.  Student Retention and Graduation: Facing the Truth, Living with the Consequences. Occasional Paper 1. , 2004 .

[7]  Gregory C. Wolniak,et al.  Learning's Weak Link to Persistence , 2012 .

[8]  S. Schwartz,et al.  Leaving College: Rethinking the Causes and Cures of Student Attrition , 1987 .

[9]  Chris Rasmussen,et al.  Student perceptions of pedagogy and associated persistence in calculus , 2014 .

[10]  Todd Rogers,et al.  Persistence , 2014 .

[11]  Norma C. Ware,et al.  Sex Differences in Choice of College Science Majors , 1988 .

[12]  Aaas News,et al.  Book Reviews , 1893, Buffalo Medical and Surgical Journal.

[13]  Julian Williams,et al.  The association between mathematics pedagogy and learners' dispositions for university study , 2012 .

[14]  A. Astin What Matters In College , 1993 .

[15]  Sheri Sheppard,et al.  A Preliminary Analysis Of Correlates Of Engineering Persistence: Results From A Longitudinal Study , 2007 .

[16]  M. Castañeda,et al.  College Persistence: Structural Equations Modeling Test of an Integrated Model of Student Retention. , 1993 .

[17]  Lynn Arthur Steen,et al.  Calculus for a New Century: A Pump, Not a Filter. Papers Presented at a Colloquium (Washington, D.C., October 28-29, 1987). MAA Notes Number 8. , 1988 .

[18]  Chris Rasmussen,et al.  The calculus student: insights from the Mathematical Association of America national study , 2013 .

[19]  P. Schuetz A Theory-Driven Model of Community College Student Engagement , 2008 .

[20]  G. Wake Introduction to the Special Issue: deepening engagement in mathematics in pre-university education , 2011 .

[21]  Scott R. Herriott,et al.  Who Takes College Algebra? , 2009 .

[22]  Matthew W. Ohland,et al.  Race, Gender, and Measures of Success in Engineering Education , 2011 .

[23]  R. Stephenson A and V , 1962, The British journal of ophthalmology.

[24]  Richard L. Halpin An Application of the Tinto Model to the Analysis of Freshman Persistence in a Community College , 1990 .

[25]  Diane Millette,et al.  A comparative analysis of teacher and student perceptions of sources of motivation and demotivation in college classes , 1997 .

[26]  R. Layton,et al.  Persistence, Engagement, and Migration in Engineering Programs , 2008 .