Driving Medical Innovation Through Interdisciplinarity: Unique Opportunities and Challenges

Many health problems facing society are multifactorial and often require social and political input as well as interventions from medical and technological experts. For example, the treatment of chronic pain requires expertise from multiple disciplines: imaging technology, cellular electrophysiology, neurochemistry, genetics, social, psychological, and cultural studies (1). While these activities are coordinated by the treating physician, they usually remain parallel and are never fully integrated to create an innovative therapy for the patient. From a research standpoint, we argue that for these new solutions to emerge, there needs to be a concerted effort to move from multidisciplinarity to interdisciplinarity. Multidisciplinary research is defined as work involving researchers from different fields who “remain conceptually and methodologically anchored in their respective fields” (2). In contrast, interdisciplinary research is defined as “a mode of research by teams or individuals that integrates information, data, techniques, tools, perspectives, concepts, and/or theories from two or more disciplines or bodies of specialized knowledge, to advance fundamental understanding or to solve problems whose solutions are beyond the scope of a single discipline or area of research practice” (3). It may lead to the creation of a new scientific field, such as environmental humanities (4–6). The major difference between the two types of research is that while interdisciplinarity involves deep and robust integration of distinct disciplines, multidisciplinarity implicates juxtaposition of a variety of expertises (5). By these definitions, both research types are clearly valuable, but interdisciplinary research should drive more impactful results for complicated problems. These advances come at a cost for researchers because interdisciplinarity has its own set of unique challenges, ranging from communication issues to allocation of credits among a team. In this article, we discuss these hurdles and potential solutions to raise awareness amongst researchers keen to lead a successful interdisciplinary project.

[1]  John H V Gilbert,et al.  A WHO report: framework for action on interprofessional education and collaborative practice. , 2010, Journal of allied health.

[2]  Robert Langer,et al.  A Blood-Resistant Surgical Glue for Minimally Invasive Repair of Vessels and Heart Defects , 2014, Science Translational Medicine.

[3]  T. McLeish,et al.  Evaluating interdisciplinary research: the elephant in the peer-reviewers’ room , 2016, Palgrave Communications.

[4]  K. Shadan,et al.  Available online: , 2012 .

[5]  J. Klein Evaluation of interdisciplinary and transdisciplinary research: a literature review. , 2008, American journal of preventive medicine.

[6]  Gabriele Bammer,et al.  Should we discipline interdisciplinarity? , 2017, Palgrave Communications.

[7]  Heidi Ledford How to solve the world's biggest problems , 2015, Nature.

[8]  Beth Baker The Science of Team Science An emerging field delves into the complexities of effective collaboration. , 2015 .

[9]  W. Cohn,et al.  Percutaneous creation of an arteriovenous fistula for hemodialysis access. , 2015, Journal of vascular and interventional radiology : JVIR.

[10]  Kara L Hall,et al.  The ecology of team science: understanding contextual influences on transdisciplinary collaboration. , 2008, American journal of preventive medicine.

[11]  B. Paterson,et al.  A meeting of minds: interdisciplinary research in the health sciences in Canada , 2006, Canadian Medical Association Journal.

[12]  Kevin W. Boyack,et al.  Approaches to understanding and measuring interdisciplinary scientific research (IDR): A review of the literature , 2011, J. Informetrics.

[13]  Kevin C. Wooten,et al.  The Multidisciplinary Translational Team (MTT) Model for Training and Development of Translational Research Investigators , 2015, Clinical and translational science.

[14]  P. Raina,et al.  It's all about relationships: A qualitative study of health researchers' perspectives of conducting interdisciplinary health research , 2008, BMC health services research.

[15]  Julie Thompson Klein,et al.  Creating Interdisciplinary Campus Cultures: A Model for Strength and Sustainability , 2009 .

[16]  Tobias Kuemmerle,et al.  The Elusive Pursuit of Interdisciplinarity at the Human-Environment Interface , 2013 .

[17]  David Isaacs Conversation as a Core Business Process by Juanita Brown and David Isaacs Building Shared Understanding , 1999 .

[18]  P. Baker,et al.  Framework for action on interprofessional education and collaborative practice , 2010 .

[19]  Gabriele Bammer,et al.  Toward a New Discipline of Integration and Implementation Sciences , 2017 .

[20]  James A Smith,et al.  Jack-of-all-trades, master of none: Postgraduate perspectives on interdisciplinary health research in Australia , 2007, BMC Health Services Research.

[21]  M. N. Lutfiyya,et al.  Development of an interprofessional and interdisciplinary collaborative research practice for clinical faculty , 2016, Journal of interprofessional care.

[22]  Kevin Crowley,et al.  The Growth of Multidisciplinarity in the Cognitive Science Society , 1998, Cogn. Sci..

[23]  J. Gagné Literature Review , 2018, Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

[24]  A. R.,et al.  Review of literature , 1951, American Potato Journal.

[25]  Kara L. Hall,et al.  The science of team science: overview of the field and introduction to the supplement. , 2008, American journal of preventive medicine.