Green roof valuation: a probabilistic economic analysis of environmental benefits.

Green (vegetated) roofs have gained global acceptance as a technologythat has the potential to help mitigate the multifaceted, complex environmental problems of urban centers. While policies that encourage green roofs exist atthe local and regional level, installation costs remain at a premium and deter investment in this technology. The objective of this paper is to quantitatively integrate the range of stormwater, energy, and air pollution benefits of green roofs into an economic model that captures the building-specific scale. Currently, green roofs are primarily valued on increased roof longevity, reduced stormwater runoff, and decreased building energy consumption. Proper valuation of these benefits can reduce the present value of a green roof if investors look beyond the upfront capital costs. Net present value (NPV) analysis comparing a conventional roof system to an extensive green roof system demonstrates that at the end of the green roof lifetime the NPV for the green roof is between 20.3 and 25.2% less than the NPV for the conventional roof over 40 years. The additional upfront investment is recovered at the time when a conventional roof would be replaced. Increasing evidence suggests that green roofs may play a significant role in urban air quality improvement For example, uptake of N0x is estimated to range from $1683 to $6383 per metric ton of NOx reduction. These benefits were included in this study, and results translate to an annual benefit of $895-3392 for a 2000 square meter vegetated roof. Improved air quality leads to a mean NPV for the green roof that is 24.5-40.2% less than the mean conventional roof NPV. Through innovative policies, the inclusion of air pollution mitigation and the reduction of municipal stormwater infrastructure costs in economic valuation of environmental benefits of green roofs can reduce the cost gap that currently hinders U.S. investment in green roof technology.

[1]  H. Saxe.  STOMATAL‐DEPENDENT AND STOMATAL‐INDEPENDENT UPTAKE OF NOx , 1986 .

[2]  A. Wellburn.  Tansley Review No. 24 Why are atmospheric oxides of nitrogen usually phytotoxic and not alternative fertilizers? , 1990, The New phytologist.

[3]  A. Rosenfeld,et al.  Heat island and oasis effects of vegetative canopies: Micro-meteorological field-measurements , 1991 .

[4]  P. Hanson,et al.  Dry deposition of reactive nitrogen compounds: A review of leaf, canopy and non-foliar measurements , 1991 .

[5]  David J. Sailor,et al.  Mitigation of urban heat islands: materials, utility programs, updates , 1995 .

[6]  G. Smiatek,et al.  Land Use Data , 1997 .

[7]  E. P. D. Barrio.  Analysis of the green roofs cooling potential in buildings , 1998 .

[8]  T. Jager,et al.  Modelling the influence of terrestrial vegetation on the environmental fate of xenobiotics , 1998 .

[9]  Misa Takahashi,et al.  More than a 600‐fold variation in nitrogen dioxide assimilation among 217 plant taxa , 1998 .

[10]  Daniel J. Jacob,et al.  Introduction to Atmospheric Chemistry , 1999 .

[11]  K. Scholz-Barth.  Green Roofs: Stormwater Management From the Top Down , 2001 .

[12]  M. Santamouris,et al.  Analysis of the green roof thermal properties and investigation of its energy performance , 2001 .

[13]  B. Brunekreef,et al.  Air pollution and health , 2002, The Lancet.

[14]  Theodore G Theodosiou,et al.  Summer period analysis of the performance of a planted roof as a passive cooling technique , 2003 .

[15]  J. Hicke,et al.  Global synthesis of leaf area index observations: implications for ecological and remote sensing studies , 2003 .

[16]  H. Akbari,et al.  Analyzing the land cover of an urban environment using high-resolution orthophotos , 2003 .

[17]  N. Wong,et al.  Investigation of thermal benefits of rooftop garden in the tropical environment , 2003 .

[18]  B. Dousseta,et al.  Satellite multi-sensor data analysis of urban surface temperatures and landcover , 2003 .

[19]  Doug Hutchinson,et al.  STORMWATER MONITORING TWO ECOROOFS IN PORTLAND, OREGON, USA , 2003 .

[20]  L. Bengtsson,et al.  Inner city stormwater control using a combination of best management practices , 2004 .

[21]  J. Chamie,et al.  World Urbanization Prospects: The 2003 Revision , 2004 .

[22]  C. Rosenzweig,et al.  Simulating changes in regional air pollution over the eastern United States due to changes in global and regional climate and emissions , 2004 .

[23]  R. Lazzarin,et al.  Experimental measurements and numerical modelling of a green roof , 2005 .

[24]  Edgar Villarreal-Gonzalez,et al.  Response of a Sedum green-roof to individual rain events , 2005 .

[25]  R. T. Fernandez,et al.  Green roof stormwater retention: effects of roof surface, slope, and media depth. , 2005, Journal of environmental quality.

[26]  Banting Doug,et al.  Report on the Environmental Benefits and Costs of Green Roof Technology for the City of Toronto , 2005 .

[27]  Misa Takahashi,et al.  Nocturnal Uptake and Assimilation of Nitrogen Dioxide by C3 and CAM Plants , 2005, Zeitschrift fur Naturforschung. C, Journal of biosciences.

[28]  Earth Pledge.  Green roofs : ecological design and construction , 2005 .

[29]  CITY OF TACOMA, WASHINGTON , 2006 .

[30]  C. Kennedy,et al.  Comparative life cycle assessment of standard and green roofs. , 2006, Environmental science & technology.

[31]  Progressive Policy Institute , 2007 .

[32]  H. Takebayashi,et al.  Surface heat budget on green roof and high reflection roof for mitigation of urban heat island , 2007 .

[33]  Queen Avenue Sw,et al.  National Energy Technology Laboratory , 2008 .