Radiation dose differences between digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis are dependent on breast thickness

Purpose To evaluate the radiation dose derived from digital mammography (DM) and digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) at different tube current-exposure time product (mAs) and at 6 phantom thicknesses from 10 to 60 mm. Materials and Methods A total of 240 DM and DBT cranio-caudal (CC) phantom images were acquired at each thickness and at four exposure levels (the baseline mAs, 50%, 25% and 12.5% the baseline mAs). The incident Air Kerma (K) at the surface of the phantoms was measured using a solid state dosimeter. Mean Glandular Doses (MGD) were calculated for both modalities (DM and DBT). Results DBT dose was greater than that of DM for all mAs at each phantom thickness. For a breast thickness of 50 mm (close to average sized breast), the dose for DBT (2.32 mGy) was 13% higher than that for DM (2.05 mGy). The results also show that the difference in MGD between DM and DBT was less for the thicker compared with the thinner phantom, this difference being approximately a factor of 2.58 at 10 mm compared with a factor of 1.08 at 60 mm. While the MGD increased with increasing phantom thickness for both modalities, the dose increase with DBT was less than for DM, with the difference between 10 and 60 mm being a factor of 7 for DM and 3 for DBT. Conclusion The radiation dose from DBT was higher than that of DM and the difference in dose between DM and DBT decreases as phantom thickness increases.

[1]  G. Barnes,et al.  Spectral dependence of glandular tissue dose in screen-film mammography. , 1991, Radiology.

[2]  N Matela,et al.  Optimal photon energy comparison between digital breast tomosynthesis and mammography: a case study. , 2014, Physica medica : PM : an international journal devoted to the applications of physics to medicine and biology : official journal of the Italian Association of Biomedical Physics.

[3]  J. S. Laughlin,et al.  Absorbed radiation dose in mammography. , 1979, Radiology.

[4]  D. Dance Monte Carlo calculation of conversion factors for the estimation of mean glandular breast dose. , 1990, Physics in medicine and biology.

[5]  Gisella Gennaro,et al.  Dose comparison between screen/film and full-field digital mammography , 2006, European Radiology.

[6]  Kenneth C. Young,et al.  Comparison of Breast Doses for Digital Tomosynthesis Estimated from Patient Exposures and Using PMMA Breast Phantoms , 2012, Digital Mammography / IWDM.

[7]  R. Hendrick,et al.  Performance comparison of full-field digital mammography to screen-film mammography in clinical practice. , 2002, Medical physics.

[8]  Ioannis Sechopoulos,et al.  Radiation dosimetry in digital breast tomosynthesis: report of AAPM Tomosynthesis Subcommittee Task Group 223. , 2014, Medical physics.

[9]  E Grabbe,et al.  Dose reduction in full-field digital mammography: an anthropomorphic breast phantom study. , 2003, The British journal of radiology.

[10]  D. Dance,et al.  Estimation of mean glandular dose for breast tomosynthesis: factors for use with the UK, European and IAEA breast dosimetry protocols , 2011, Physics in medicine and biology.

[11]  C. D'Orsi,et al.  Computation of the glandular radiation dose in digital tomosynthesis of the breast. , 2006, Medical physics.

[12]  Tao Wu,et al.  Lesion Visibility in Low Dose Tomosynthesis , 2006, Digital Mammography / IWDM.

[13]  Carl J. D'Orsi,et al.  Glandular radiation dose in tomosynthesis of the breast using tungsten targets , 2008, Journal of applied clinical medical physics.

[14]  Jack Valentin,et al.  The 2007 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. ICRP publication 103. , 2007, Annals of the ICRP.

[15]  C. J. Kotre,et al.  Additional factors for the estimation of mean glandular breast dose using the UK mammography dosimetry protocol. , 2000, Physics in medicine and biology.

[16]  P P Fatouros,et al.  Absorbed breast dose: dependence on radiographic modality and technique, and breast thickness. , 1986, Radiology.

[17]  Spencer Gunn,et al.  Mean glandular dose estimation using MCNPX for a digital breast tomosynthesis system with tungsten/aluminum and tungsten/aluminum+silver x-ray anode-filter combinations. , 2008, Medical physics.

[18]  Ioannis Sechopoulos,et al.  Clinical digital breast tomosynthesis system: dosimetric characterization. , 2012, Radiology.