A clinical investigation of the morphological changes in the posterior mandible when implant-retained overdentures are used.

OBJECTIVES The widespread use and broad acceptance of osseointegrated dental implants as a means of retaining and supporting mandibular overdentures provide potentially stable three-dimensional reference structures, which have been used to examine the morphological changes of the surface contours of the mandibular ridges distal to implants. Unlike traditional methods that tended to measure changes in ridge morphology and quantity radiographically, this prospective study investigated the changes in the sagittal surface contours of the posterior residual ridges over a 1-year period by an alternative, non-radiographic method using serial casts of residual ridges of a group of patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS The residual ridges of the serial casts produced were examined using a profiling apparatus and computer software programs that allowed the orientation, digitised recording and measurement of the sagittal surface contours of the posterior residual ridges of mandibular casts in terms of area (cm(2)). RESULTS Statistical analysis revealed that the detected reductive changes in the surface contour of the posterior residual ridges following the wearing of an implant-retained mandibular overdenture over a 1-year period were highly significant (P<0.001). CONCLUSION It is concluded that the methodology presented in this study can be used reliably as an alternative to radiographical examination for detecting changes that occur in the distal residual alveolar ridges of the implant containing edentulous mandible when implant-retained overdentures are used. Thus, the method presented may be used to contribute to a reduced exposure to ionising radiation for patients wearing implant-retained overdentures.

[1]  Steven M. Morgano,et al.  Complete edentulism and denture use for elders in New England. , 1996, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[2]  D. R. Burns,et al.  Mandibular implant overdenture treatment: consensus and controversy. , 2000, Journal of prosthodontics : official journal of the American College of Prosthodontists.

[3]  L. Sennerby,et al.  Mandibular bone resorption in patients treated with tissue-integrated prostheses and in complete-denture wearers. , 1988, Acta odontologica Scandinavica.

[4]  P. Wright,et al.  Posterior mandibular residual ridge resorption in patients with conventional dentures and implant overdentures. , 2003, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[5]  I Naert,et al.  Overdentures supported by osseointegrated fixtures for the edentulous mandible: a 2.5-year report. , 1988, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[6]  D. Jagger,et al.  Clinical Effectiveness Implant-retained of Mandibular Overdentures , 2001 .

[7]  M. Quirynen,et al.  The reliability of implant-retained hinging overdentures for the fully edentulous mandible An up to 9-year longitudinal study , 1997, Clinical Oral Investigations.

[8]  Wright Ps,et al.  Effect of prefabricated bar design with implant-stabilized prostheses on ridge resorption: a clinical report. , 1998 .

[9]  R. Mericske-Stern Clinical evaluation of overdenture restorations supported by osseointegrated titanium implants: a retrospective study. , 1990, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[10]  P I Brånemark,et al.  A 15-year study of osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw. , 1981, International journal of oral surgery.

[11]  R. Jacobs,et al.  Comparison between implant-supported prostheses and teeth regarding passive threshold level. , 1993, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[12]  G. Walker,et al.  Roentgen cephalometric analysis of ridge resorption and changes in jaw and occlusal relationships in immediate complete denture wearers. , 1980, Journal of oral rehabilitation.

[13]  D van Steenberghe,et al.  Prosthetic aspects of osseointegrated fixtures supporting overdentures. A 4-year report. , 1991, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[14]  D van Steenberghe,et al.  Survival of the Brånemark implant in partially edentulous jaws: a 10-year prospective multicenter study. , 1999, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[15]  T E Jacobson,et al.  A contemporary review of the factors involved in complete dentures. Part II: stability. , 1983, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[16]  M. Quirynen,et al.  Posterior jaw bone resorption in osseointegrated implant-supported overdentures. , 1992, Clinical oral implants research.

[17]  D. Evans,et al.  Combination syndrome associated with a mandibular implant-supported overdenture: a clinical report. , 1996, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[18]  U. Lekholm,et al.  Oral function in subjects with overdentures supported by osseointegrated implants. , 1988, Scandinavian journal of dental research.

[19]  R. M. Watson,et al.  The effects of fixed and removable implant-stabilised prostheses on posterior mandibular residual ridge resorption. , 2002, Clinical oral implants research.

[20]  C. Johnston,et al.  Prosthetic management of the atrophic mandible using endosseous implants and overdentures: a six year review , 1995, British Dental Journal.

[21]  A Tallgren,et al.  The continuing reduction of the residual alveolar ridges in complete denture wearers: a mixed-longitudinal study covering 25 years. , 2003, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.