Time Lag of Secondary ESD in Millimeter-Size Spark Gaps

This study relates to the delay of secondary electrostatic discharges (ESDs). The first motivation for this study is the fact that the delay value is a required input parameter for the simulation of the secondary ESD. The second motivation is that this delay is one limiting factor for the usage of spark gaps as protection devices. The objective is to determine the delay for different intended and unintended spark gap structures as this time delay will influence the peak current and rise time of the secondary ESD across these gaps. The intended application is ESD protection in consumer products, for that reason 0.5-3 mm gap distances and voltages up to 14 kV are considered at different humidity levels. Very long time lags are observed for clean sphere-to-sphere gaps requiring average field strengths >200 kV/cm to achieve a breakdown in a few nanoseconds in dry air. Humidity is shown to strongly reduce the time lag. However, if printed circuit board (PCB) spark gap geometries are considered the time lags are much smaller. Similar shorter lag times have been found in geometries that resemble more unintentional breakdown locations in a product.

[1]  A. Pedersen,et al.  Formulation of the streamer breakdown criterion and its application to strongly electronegative gases and gas mixtures , 1984 .

[2]  N. L. Allen,et al.  Effects of humidity on corona inception in a diverging electric field , 1981 .

[3]  C. Morgan,et al.  Fundamental Processes of the Initiation of Electrical Discharges , 1953 .

[4]  Fuminori Kobayashi,et al.  Decrease of primary electron number by NO, CO2, and SF6 mixing at breakdown in high‐pressure nitrogen , 2010 .

[5]  P. Chatterton A theoretical study of field emission initiated vacuum breakdown , 1966 .

[6]  S. J. Levinson,et al.  Investigation of the Statistical and Formative Time Lags Associated with the Breakdown of a Gas in a Gap at High Overvoltage , 1982, IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science.

[7]  David Pommerenke Transient fields of ESD , 1994 .

[8]  F. L. Jones,et al.  The theory and design of an analyser for investigating the electron emission characteristics of surfaces in gases , 1962 .

[9]  Ronald B. Standler,et al.  Technology of Fast Spark Gaps , 1989 .

[10]  R. Fowler,et al.  Electron Emission in Intense Electric Fields , 1928 .

[11]  F. L. Jones,et al.  Surface films and field emission of electrons , 1953, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences.

[12]  J. Arlin Cooper,et al.  The Lightning Arrestor-Connector Concept: Description and Data , 1973 .

[13]  Jiang Xiao,et al.  Model of Secondary ESD for a Portable Electronic Product , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility.

[14]  F. Kobayashi,et al.  Decrease of Primary Electron Number by NO, CO 2 and SF 6 Mixing at the Breakdown in High Pressure Nitrogen , 2008 .

[15]  Experimental confirmation of the Fowler Nordheim plot at several micro-meters emitter to anode distance , 1995, IVMC '95. Eighth International Vacuum Microelectronics Conference. Technical Digest (Cat. No.TH8012).

[16]  M. J. Morant Interpretation of Experiments on Electron Emission in Spark Gaps , 1955 .

[17]  David Pommerenke,et al.  ESD: transient fields, arc simulation and rise time limit , 1995 .

[18]  Morten Soerensen Printed atmospheric spark gaps as ESD-protection , 2009, 2009 20th International Zurich Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility.