Designed entrepreneurial legitimacy: the case of a Swedish crowdfunding platform

ABSTRACT Digital entrepreneurs face the liability of newness, like any other entrepreneur. However, this liability of newness is manifested differently: it is mediated by an artefact, in this case a platform. This paper examines how a digital entrepreneur mediated by a platform can build legitimacy, something hitherto thought to be embedded within a social relationship (that is, one that a digital platform may be unable to have). Based on a qualitative research design, we develop the concept of “designed legitimacy”, and we point to how trust may not be enough to overcome the liability of newness. Rather, legitimacy is needed to attract users and resources, and thus for growth and success. We further highlight the means through which a platform may come to be seen as legitimate, namely by designing with legitimacy in mind: by using symbols in design, asymmetric legitimacy building, and sequential two-stage legitimacy building. We end the paper with propositions for further study and the implications of this research for digital entrepreneurship and platforms.

[1]  Adrija Majumdar,et al.  My words for your pizza: An analysis of persuasive narratives in online crowdfunding , 2018, Inf. Manag..

[2]  David S. Evans.  Some Empirical Aspects of Multi-sided Platform Industries , 2003 .

[3]  A. Gawer,et al.  Industry Platforms and Ecosystem Innovation , 2013 .

[4]  Scott L. Newbert,et al.  Exploring the Determinants of Organizational Emergence: A Legitimacy Perspective , 2007 .

[5]  Thomas R. Eisenmann,et al.  Platform Envelopment , 2010 .

[6]  Elizabeth J. Davidson,et al.  Digital Entrepreneurship and Its Sociomaterial Enactment , 2010, 2010 43rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[7]  Antoinette Schoar,et al.  The Consequences of Entrepreneurial Finance: Evidence from Angel Financings , 2014 .

[8]  Anindya Ghose,et al.  Secret Admirers: An Empirical Examination of Information Hiding and Contribution Dynamics in Online Crowdfunding , 2016, Inf. Syst. Res..

[9]  Ilídio Barreto,et al.  To Conform or to Perform? Mimetic Behaviour, Legitimacy-Based Groups and Performance Consequences , 2006 .

[10]  Mark C. Suchman,et al.  Legitimacy in Organizational Institutionalism , 2009 .

[11]  Kathleen M. Eisenhardt,et al.  Theory Building From Cases: Opportunities And Challenges , 2007 .

[12]  W. Scott.  'Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony', American Journal of Sociology, 83, pp. 340-63. , 2016 .

[13]  Benson Honig,et al.  The Life Cycle of an Internet Firm: Scripts, Legitimacy, and Identity , 2009 .

[14]  Mark C. Suchman.  Managing Legitimacy: Strategic and Institutional Approaches , 1995 .

[15]  François-Xavier de Vaujany,et al.  If These Walls Could Talk: The Mutual Construction of Organizational Space and Legitimacy , 2014, Organ. Sci..

[16]  Martin L. Martens,et al.  DO THE STORIES THEY TELL GET THEM THE MONEY THEY NEED? THE ROLE OF ENTREPRENEURIAL NARRATIVES IN RESOURCE ACQUISITION , 2007 .

[17]  Joseph Feller,et al.  A Rift in the Ground: Theorizing the Evolution of Anchor Values in Crowdfunding Communities through the Oculus Rift Case Study , 2016, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[18]  J. March,et al.  Information in Organizations as Signal and Symbol. , 1981 .

[19]  J. Rochet,et al.  Platform competition in two sided markets , 2003 .

[20]  P. Sztompka.  Trust: A Sociological Theory , 2000 .

[21]  Jan Marco Leimeister,et al.  Not just an ego-trip: Exploring backers' motivation for funding in incentive-based crowdfunding , 2017, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[22]  Clifford Nass,et al.  The media equation - how people treat computers, television, and new media like real people and places , 1996 .

[23]  Marios Koufaris,et al.  The development of initial trust in an online company by new customers , 2004, Inf. Manag..

[24]  Joseph Feller,et al.  Emerging technologies and the democratisation of financial services: A metatriangulation of crowdfunding research , 2016, Inf. Organ..

[25]  Paul Belleflamme,et al.  Crowdfunding: Tapping the Right Crowd , 2013, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[26]  Evangelos Katsamakas,et al.  Design and Ownership of Two-Sided Networks: Implications for Internet Platforms , 2008, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[27]  R. Whitley,et al.  Managing competences in entrepreneurial technology firms: a comparative institutional analysis of Germany, Sweden and the UK , 2004 .

[28]  Susan Wiedenbeck,et al.  On-line trust: concepts, evolving themes, a model , 2003, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[29]  A. Strauss,et al.  Grounded theory , 2017 .

[30]  Youngjin Yoo,et al.  Distributed Tuning of Boundary Resources: The Case of Apple's iOS Service System , 2015, MIS Q..

[31]  David S. Evans,et al.  How Catalysts Ignite: The Economics of Platform-Based Start-Ups , 2009 .

[32]  Raquel Benbunan-Fich,et al.  Signaling theory and information asymmetry in online commerce , 2012, Inf. Manag..

[33]  Steven C. Wheelwright,et al.  Revolutionizing Product Development: Quantum Leaps in Speed, Efficiency and Quality , 1992 .

[34]  Blake E. Ashforth,et al.  The Double-Edge of Organizational Legitimation , 1990 .

[35]  Ingemar Wictor,et al.  Innovative Internationalisation in New firms: Born Globals–the Swedish Case , 2003 .

[36]  Heather A. Haveman.  Follow the leader: Mimetic isomorphism and entry into new markets , 1993 .

[37]  Henry L Hu.  The Generative Internet（创生性的互联网） , 2010 .

[38]  Hans Landström,et al.  A Pilot Study on the Investment Decision-Making Behavior of Informal Investors in Sweden , 1995 .

[39]  M. Zimmerman,et al.  Beyond Survival: Achieving New Venture Growth by Building Legitimacy , 2002 .

[40]  R. Yin.  The Case Study Crisis: Some Answers , 1981 .

[41]  J. H. Davis,et al.  An Integrative Model Of Organizational Trust , 1995 .

[42]  M. Colombo,et al.  Internal Social Capital and the Attraction of Early Contributions in Crowdfunding , 2015 .

[43]  Youngjin Yoo,et al.  The Liminality of Trajectory Shifts in Institutional Entrepreneurship , 2014, Organ. Sci..

[44]  Joakim Björkdahl.  Technology cross-fertilization and the business model: The case of integrating ICTs in mechanical engineering products , 2009 .

[45]  Ashley A. Bush,et al.  Platform Evolution: Coevolution of Platform Architecture, Governance, and Environmental Dynamics , 2010 .

[46]  Detmar W. Straub,et al.  Trust and TAM in Online Shopping: An Integrated Model , 2003, MIS Q..

[47]  M. Gibbert,et al.  What passes as a rigorous case study , 2008 .

[48]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  Trust In and Adoption of Online Recommendation Agents , 2005, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[49]  C. Shapiro,et al.  Systems Competition and Network Effects , 1994 .

[50]  Raymond F. Zammuto,et al.  WIELDING THE WILLOW: PROCESSES OF INSTITUTIONAL CHANGE IN ENGLISH COUNTY CRICKET , 2013 .

[51]  Peter G. W. Keen,et al.  Value architectures for digital business: beyond the business model , 2013 .

[52]  Alexander Benlian,et al.  Opening the floodgates: the implications of increasing platform openness in crowdfunding , 2017, J. Inf. Technol..

[53]  Jonathan Zittrain,et al.  Law and technologyThe end of the generative internet , 2009, CACM.

[54]  Ola Henfridsson,et al.  Everyday Digital Entrepreneurship: The Inception, Shifts, and Scaling of Future Shaping Practices , 2014, ICIS.

[55]  Eleanor Shaw,et al.  Apostasy versus legitimacy: Relational dynamics and routes to resource acquisition in entrepreneurial ventures , 2014 .

[56]  Harro van Lente,et al.  Navigating foresight in a sea of expectations: lessons from the sociology of expectations , 2012, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag..

[57]  R. Greenwood,et al.  Rhetorical Strategies of Legitimacy , 2005 .

[58]  Rob Gleasure,et al.  Resistance to crowdfunding among entrepreneurs: An impression management perspective , 2015, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[59]  Karen Locke.  Grounded Theory in Management Research , 2000 .

[60]  Kalle Lyytinen,et al.  Organizing for Innovation in the Digitized World , 2012, Organ. Sci..

[61]  Batya Friedman,et al.  Trust online , 2000, CACM.

[62]  Quy Nguyen Huy,et al.  How Entrepreneurs Use Symbolic Management to Acquire Resources , 2007 .

[63]  R. Suddaby.  From the Editors: What Grounded Theory is Not , 2006 .

[64]  M. Lynne Markus,et al.  If we build it, they will come: Designing information systems that people want to use , 1994 .

[65]  W. Powell,et al.  The iron cage revisited institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields , 1983 .

[66]  Stefan Jonsson,et al.  The Limits of Media Effects: Field Positions and Cultural Change in a Mutual Fund Market , 2011, Organ. Sci..

[67]  G. Poggi.  Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretive Sociology , 1969 .

[68]  A. Gawer.  Platforms, Markets and Innovation , 2011 .

[69]  Garry D. Bruton,et al.  Learning from successful local private firms in China: Establishing legitimacy , 2001 .

[70]  B. Leca,et al.  How actors change institutions: Towards a theory of institutional entrepreneurship , 2009 .

[71]  Geoffrey G. Parker,et al.  Two-Sided Network Effects: A Theory of Information Product Design , 2010, Manag. Sci..

[72]  Bengisu Tulu,et al.  A Theory of Organization-EHR Affordance Actualization , 2014, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[73]  Siva Viswanathan,et al.  Home Bias in Online Investments: An Empirical Study of an Online Crowdfunding Market , 2014, Manag. Sci..

[74]  M.A. Cusumano,et al.  The elements of platform leadership , 2003, IEEE Engineering Management Review.

[75]  Ethan Mollick.  The Dynamics of Crowdfunding: An Exploratory Study , 2014 .

[76]  N. Moray,et al.  Trust in automation. Part II. Experimental studies of trust and human intervention in a process control simulation. , 1996, Ergonomics.

[77]  John W. Meyer,et al.  Organizational Environments: Ritual and Rationality , 1984 .

[78]  Bendik Bygstad,et al.  The Generative Mechanisms of Digital Infrastructure Evolution , 2013, MIS Q..

[79]  M. Porter.  Location, Competition, and Economic Development: Local Clusters in a Global Economy , 2000 .

[80]  Amit V. Deokar,et al.  Detecting Fraudulent Behavior on Crowdfunding Platforms: The Role of Linguistic and Content-Based Cues in Static and Dynamic Contexts , 2016, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[81]  S. Nambisan.  Digital Entrepreneurship: Toward a Digital Technology Perspective of Entrepreneurship , 2017 .

[82]  Truls Erikson,et al.  Entrepreneurial capital: the emerging venture's most important asset and competitive advantage , 2002 .

[83]  Avi Goldfarb,et al.  Crowdfunding: Geography, Social Networks, and the Timing of Investment Decisions , 2015, Journal of Economics & Management Strategy.

[84]  Olle Findahl.  Svenskarna och Internet 2011 , 2011 .

[85]  J. Ross,et al.  Beyond the Business Case: New Approaches to IT Investment , 2002 .

[86]  M. Porter.  Clusters and the new economics of competition. , 1998, Harvard business review.

[87]  David L. Deephouse,et al.  Does Isomorphism Legitimate? , 1996 .

[88]  Detmar W. Straub,et al.  Examining Trust in Information Technology Artifacts: The Effects of System Quality and Culture , 2008, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[89]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  A Research Agenda for Trust in Online Environments , 2008, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[90]  J. Rochet,et al.  Defining Two-Sided Markets , 2004 .

[91]  Sofia Avdeitchikova,et al.  On the structure of the informal venture capital market in Sweden: developing investment roles , 2008 .

[92]  Anindya Ghose,et al.  An Empirical Examination of the Antecedents and Consequences of Contribution Patterns in Crowd-Funded Markets , 2013, Inf. Syst. Res..

[93]  Justine Cassell,et al.  External manifestations of trustworthiness in the interface , 2000, CACM.

[94]  Raymond Dart,et al.  The legitimacy of social enterprise , 2004 .

[95]  Raghu Garud,et al.  Entrepreneurial Storytelling, Future Expectations, and the Paradox of Legitimacy , 2014, Organ. Sci..