Anaerobic batch leaching tests of shale rock grains

Arsenic leaching from shale rock grains was evaluated by the regulatory and modified batch leaching tests. The regulatory test was in according to the Japanese Leaching Test No. 46. The modified batch leaching tests were carried out using de-aired distilled water and eliminating headspace to simulate anaerobic conditions. The results show that dissolved oxygen (DO) in normal batch leaching tests is ~6.0 mg/L. DO can be reduced to ~2.0 mg/L by using deaired water and eliminating the headspace and shaking step. The results suggest that a pseudo anaerobic condition can be achieved by eliminating the headspace and shaking step and conducting the tests in the vacuum deaerator since the DO was very low (~1.1 mg/L). Under the pseudo anaerobic conditions, the arsenic leaching concentrations are lowest (~0.001 mg/L), implying that arsenic leaching might be suppressed under anaerobic conditions. Furthermore, these arsenic concentrations are below the regulatory standard (As < 0.01 mg/L), suggesting that the shale rock grains are environmentally safe for utilisation in geotechnical applications.

[1]  H. Sakanakura,et al.  Effects of membrane filter material and pore size on turbidity and hazardous element concentrations in soil batch leaching tests. , 2020, Chemosphere.

[2]  T. Katsumi,et al.  Leaching characteristics of naturally derived toxic elements from soils in the western Osaka area: considerations from the analytical results under the Soil Contamination Countermeasures Act , 2020 .

[3]  T. Katsumi,et al.  Laboratory tests on arsenic leaching from excavated shale rock by elevated temperatures , 2020, E3S Web of Conferences.

[4]  Maria T. Johansson,et al.  Coordinating soil and rock material in urban construction – Scenario analysis of material flows and greenhouse gas emissions , 2019 .

[5]  J. Wilding,et al.  Generation rate and fate of surplus soil extracted in New York City. , 2019, The Science of the total environment.

[6]  Naoki Hiroyoshi,et al.  Arsenic, selenium, boron, lead, cadmium, copper, and zinc in naturally contaminated rocks: A review of their sources, modes of enrichment, mechanisms of release, and mitigation strategies. , 2018, The Science of the total environment.

[7]  P. Tangviroon,et al.  Effects of Additional Layer(s) on the Mobility of Arsenic from Hydrothermally Altered Rock in Laboratory Column Experiments , 2017, Water, Air, & Soil Pollution.

[8]  U. Kalbe,et al.  Column percolation test for contaminated soils: Key factors for standardization. , 2016, Journal of hazardous materials.

[9]  D. Nikolopoulos,et al.  Arsenic Occurrence and Fate in the Environment; A Geochemical Perspective , 2015 .

[10]  T. Katsumi Soil excavation and reclamation in civil engineering: Environmental aspects , 2015 .

[11]  T. Yoneda,et al.  Utilization of natural and artificial adsorbents in the mitigation of arsenic leached from hydrothermally altered rock , 2013 .

[12]  Heinz‐Georg Haid,et al.  Katzenberg tunnel – environmental and approval constraints on the recycling of tunnel spoil material , 2009 .

[13]  Y. Komiya,et al.  Error correction method for hydrometer analysis in test method for particle size distribution of soils , 2008 .

[14]  M. Kamon,et al.  REDOX EFFECTS ON HEAVY METAL ATTENUATION IN LANDFILL CLAY LINER , 2002 .

[15]  P. Brown,et al.  The stabilities of calcium arsenates at 23 ± 1°C , 1999 .