Removal of interference from fetal MEG by frequency dependent subtraction

Fetal magnetoencephalography (fMEG) recordings are contaminated by maternal and fetal magnetocardiography (MCG) signals and by other biological and environmental interference. Currently, all methods for the attenuation of these signals are based on a time-domain approach. We have developed and tested a frequency dependent procedure for removal of MCG and other interference from the fMEG recordings. The method uses a set of reference channels and performs subtraction of interference in the frequency domain (SUBTR). The interference-free frequency domain signals are converted back to the time domain. We compare the performance of the frequency dependent approach with our present approach for MCG attenuation based on orthogonal projection (OP). SUBTR has an advantage over OP and similar template approaches because it removes not only the MCG but also other small amplitude biological interference, avoids the difficulties with inaccurate determination of the OP operator, provides more consistent and stable fMEG results, does not cause signal redistribution, and if references are selected judiciously, it does not reduce fMEG signal amplitude. SUBTR was found to perform well in simulations and on real fMEG recordings, and has a potential to improve the detection of fetal brain signals. The SUBTR removes interference without the need for a model of the individual interference sources. The method may be of interest for any sensor array noise reduction application where signal-free reference channels are available.

[1]  Hubert Preissl,et al.  Fetal MEG redistribution by projection operators , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[2]  H. Spekreijse,et al.  Principal components analysis for source localization of VEPs in man , 1987, Vision Research.

[3]  A. Achim,et al.  Methods for separating temporally overlapping sources of neuroelectric data , 2005, Brain Topography.

[4]  K. Sekihara,et al.  Generalized Wiener estimation of three-dimensional current distribution from biomagnetic measurements , 1996, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[5]  Hubert Preissl,et al.  Redefining fetal evoked fields with biomagnetic recordings over the whole maternal abdomen , 2001, 2001 Conference Proceedings of the 23rd Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[6]  J. Bendat,et al.  Random Data: Analysis and Measurement Procedures , 1987 .

[7]  Siu Wing Or,et al.  Dynamic magnetomechanical properties of Terfenol-D/epoxy pseudo 1-3 composites , 2005 .

[8]  Hubert Preissl,et al.  Human fetal brain imaging by magnetoencephalography: verification of fetal brain signals by comparison with fetal brain models , 2004, NeuroImage.

[9]  S E Robinson,et al.  Cleaning fetal MEG using a beamformer search for the optimal forward model. , 2004, Neurology & clinical neurophysiology : NCN.

[10]  Hsu,et al.  Local-geometric-projection method for noise reduction in chaotic maps and flows. , 1992, Physical review. A, Atomic, molecular, and optical physics.

[11]  Hubert Preissl,et al.  Short-term serial magnetoencephalography recordings offetal auditory evoked responses , 2002, Neuroscience Letters.

[12]  Hubert Preissl,et al.  Fetal MEG evoked response latency from beamformer with random field theory , 2010, NeuroImage.

[13]  S Makeig,et al.  Blind separation of auditory event-related brain responses into independent components. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[14]  C D Tesche,et al.  Signal-space projections of MEG data characterize both distributed and well-localized neuronal sources. , 1995, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[15]  R. B. Govindan,et al.  A Novel Approach to Track Fetal Movement Using Multi-sensor Magnetocardiographic Recordings , 2011, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[16]  R. Wakai,et al.  Improved neuromagnetic detection of fetal and neonatal auditory evoked responses , 2001, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[17]  J. Vrba,et al.  Recording of Temporal-Spatial Biomagnetic Signals over the whole Maternal Abdomen with SARA - Auditory Fetal Brain Responses , 2001 .

[18]  Hubert Preissl,et al.  Verification of fetal brain responses by coregistration of fetal ultrasound and fetal magnetoencephalography data , 2010, NeuroImage.

[19]  J. Bendat,et al.  Random Data: Analysis and Measurement Procedures , 1971 .

[20]  Scott L. Zeger,et al.  Non‐linear Fourier Time Series Analysis for Human Brain Mapping by Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging , 1997 .

[21]  J D Wilson,et al.  Understanding dynamics of the system using Hilbert phases: an application to study neonatal and fetal brain signals. , 2009, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[22]  W. Drongelen,et al.  Localization of brain electrical activity via linearly constrained minimum variance spatial filtering , 1997, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[23]  R. Ilmoniemi,et al.  Signal-space projection method for separating MEG or EEG into components , 1997, Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing.

[24]  Gabriel Curio,et al.  Optimal imaging of cortico-muscular coherence through a novel regression technique based on multi-channel EEG and un-rectified EMG , 2011, NeuroImage.

[25]  Theodore A. Buchhold,et al.  Applications of Superconductivity , 1960 .

[26]  R. Näätänen,et al.  Auditory magnetic responses of healthy newborns , 2003, Neuroreport.

[27]  S. Taulu,et al.  Spatiotemporal signal space separation method for rejecting nearby interference in MEG measurements , 2006, Physics in medicine and biology.

[28]  T. Gasser,et al.  The transfer of EOG activity into the EEG for eyes open and closed. , 1985, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[29]  Jean-Francois Cardoso,et al.  Blind signal separation: statistical principles , 1998, Proc. IEEE.

[30]  Harold W. Sorenson,et al.  Parameter estimation: Principles and problems , 1980 .

[31]  Andreas Ziehe,et al.  Artifact Reduction in Magnetoneurography Based on Time-Delayed Second Order Correlations , 1998 .

[32]  Se Robinson,et al.  Functional neuroimaging by Synthetic Aperture Magnetometry (SAM) , 1999 .

[33]  J. Vrba,et al.  Multichannel SQUID Biomagnetic Systems , 2000 .

[34]  B. V. Veen,et al.  Localization of intra-cerebral sources of electrical activity via linearly constrained minimum variance spatial filtering , 1992, [1992] IEEE Sixth SP Workshop on Statistical Signal and Array Processing.

[35]  H. Preissl,et al.  Searching for the best model: ambiguity of inverse solutions and application to fetal magnetoencephalography , 2007, Physics in medicine and biology.

[36]  H Eswaran,et al.  Validation of the flash-evoked response from fetal MEG , 2007, Physics in medicine and biology.

[37]  Aapo Hyvärinen,et al.  Fast and robust fixed-point algorithms for independent component analysis , 1999, IEEE Trans. Neural Networks.

[38]  M. Karjalainen,et al.  Short-term memory functions of the human fetus recorded with magnetoencephalography , 2005, Neuroreport.

[39]  Aapo Hyvärinen,et al.  Validating the independent components of neuroimaging time series via clustering and visualization , 2004, NeuroImage.

[40]  Richard M. Leahy,et al.  Adaptive filters for monitoring localized brain activity from surface potential time series , 1992, [1992] Conference Record of the Twenty-Sixth Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems & Computers.

[41]  S. Taulu,et al.  Presentation of electromagnetic multichannel data: The signal space separation method , 2005 .