Relationship between histone modifications and transcription factor binding is protein family specific

The very small fraction of putative binding sites (BSs) that are occupied by transcription factors (TFs) in vivo can be highly variable across different cell types. This observation has been partly attributed to changes in chromatin accessibility and histone modification (HM) patterns surrounding BSs. Previous studies focusing on BSs within DNA regulatory regions found correlations between HM patterns and TF binding specificities. However, a mechanistic understanding of TF–DNA binding specificity determinants is still not available. The ability to predict in vivo TF binding on a genome-wide scale requires the identification of features that determine TF binding based on evolutionary relationships of DNA binding proteins. To reveal protein family–dependent mechanisms of TF binding, we conducted comprehensive comparisons of HM patterns surrounding BSs and non-BSs with exactly matched core motifs for TFs in three cell lines: 33 TFs in GM12878, 37 TFs in K562, and 18 TFs in H1-hESC. These TFs displayed protein family–specific preferences for HM patterns surrounding BSs, with high agreement among cell lines. Moreover, compared to models based on DNA sequence and shape at flanking regions of BSs, HM-augmented quantitative machine-learning methods resulted in increased performance in a TF family–specific manner. Analysis of the relative importance of features in these models indicated that TFs, displaying larger HM pattern differences between BSs and non-BSs, bound DNA in an HM-specific manner on a protein family–specific basis. We propose that TF family–specific HM preferences reveal distinct mechanisms that assist in guiding TFs to their cognate BSs by altering chromatin structure and accessibility.

[1]  Yawen Bai,et al.  Emerging roles of linker histones in regulating chromatin structure and function , 2017, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[2]  R. Mann,et al.  Genome-wide prediction of minor-groove electrostatic potential enables biophysical modeling of protein–DNA binding , 2017, Nucleic acids research.

[3]  M. Bulyk,et al.  Transcription factor-DNA binding: beyond binding site motifs. , 2017, Current opinion in genetics & development.

[4]  Z. Yakhini,et al.  Systematic Investigation of Transcription Factor Activity in the Context of Chromatin Using Massively Parallel Binding and Expression Assays. , 2017, Molecular cell.

[5]  D. Dickel,et al.  Improved regulatory element prediction based on tissue-specific local epigenomic signatures , 2017, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[6]  R. Shamir,et al.  Transcription factor family‐specific DNA shape readout revealed by quantitative specificity models , 2017, Molecular systems biology.

[7]  Lin Yang,et al.  DNA Shape Features Improve Transcription Factor Binding Site Predictions In Vivo. , 2016, Cell systems.

[8]  R. Rohs,et al.  How motif environment influences transcription factor search dynamics: Finding a needle in a haystack , 2016, BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology.

[9]  S. Mango,et al.  Pioneer transcription factors, chromatin dynamics, and cell fate control. , 2016, Current opinion in genetics & development.

[10]  Lin Yang,et al.  DNAshapeR: an R/Bioconductor package for DNA shape prediction and feature encoding , 2015, Bioinform..

[11]  Xiaobo Zhou,et al.  Modeling co-occupancy of transcription factors using chromatin features , 2015, Nucleic acids research.

[12]  David J. Arenillas,et al.  JASPAR 2016: a major expansion and update of the open-access database of transcription factor binding profiles , 2015, Nucleic Acids Res..

[13]  Wendy A Bickmore,et al.  The Hierarchy of Transcriptional Activation: From Enhancer to Promoter. , 2015, Trends in genetics : TIG.

[14]  A. Jolma,et al.  DNA-dependent formation of transcription factor pairs alters their binding specificity , 2015, Nature.

[15]  Beibei Xin,et al.  ChEC-seq kinetics discriminates transcription factor binding sites by DNA sequence and shape in vivo , 2015, Nature Communications.

[16]  R. Rohs,et al.  A widespread role of the motif environment in transcription factor binding across diverse protein families , 2015, Genome research.

[17]  Judith B. Zaugg,et al.  Genetic Control of Chromatin States in Humans Involves Local and Distal Chromosomal Interactions , 2015, Cell.

[18]  R. Mann,et al.  Deconvolving the Recognition of DNA Shape from Sequence , 2015, Cell.

[19]  Xiaobo Zhou,et al.  Modeling the relationship of epigenetic modifications to transcription factor binding , 2015, Nucleic acids research.

[20]  Z. Yakhini,et al.  Unraveling determinants of transcription factor binding outside the core binding site , 2015, Genome research.

[21]  R. Mann,et al.  Quantitative modeling of transcription factor binding specificities using DNA shape , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[22]  Michael J. Ziller,et al.  Transcription factor binding dynamics during human ESC differentiation , 2015, Nature.

[23]  Steven Henikoff,et al.  Transcribing through the nucleosome. , 2014, Trends in biochemical sciences.

[24]  Michael J. Ziller,et al.  Dissecting neural differentiation regulatory networks through epigenetic footprinting , 2014, Nature.

[25]  Raluca Gordân,et al.  Protein−DNA binding in the absence of specific base-pair recognition , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[26]  Sailu Yellaboina,et al.  Histone-fold domain protein NF-Y promotes chromatin accessibility for cell type-specific master transcription factors. , 2014, Molecular cell.

[27]  Guido Sanguinetti,et al.  Explorer Transcription factor binding predicts histone modifications in human cell lines , 2017 .

[28]  Matthew Slattery,et al.  Absence of a simple code: how transcription factors read the genome. , 2014, Trends in biochemical sciences.

[29]  B. Strahl,et al.  Interpreting the language of histone and DNA modifications. , 2014, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[30]  Shuo Wang,et al.  Mechanistic Heterogeneity in Site Recognition by the Structurally Homologous DNA-binding Domains of the ETS Family Transcription Factors Ets-1 and PU.1* , 2014, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[31]  E. Segal,et al.  In pursuit of design principles of regulatory sequences , 2014, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[32]  A. Stark,et al.  Transcriptional enhancers: from properties to genome-wide predictions , 2014, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[33]  Miguel Beato,et al.  bwtool: a tool for bigWig files , 2014, Bioinform..

[34]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[35]  X. Liu,et al.  Genome-wide analysis of histone modifications: H3K4me2, H3K4me3, H3K9ac, and H3K27ac in Oryza sativa L. Japonica. , 2013, Molecular plant.

[36]  Sebastian J Maerkl,et al.  Mapping the fine structure of a eukaryotic promoter input-output function , 2013, Nature Genetics.

[37]  Manolis Kellis,et al.  Interplay between chromatin state, regulator binding, and regulatory motifs in six human cell types , 2013, Genome research.

[38]  Lin Yang,et al.  DNAshape: a method for the high-throughput prediction of DNA structural features on a genomic scale , 2013, Nucleic Acids Res..

[39]  M. Bulyk,et al.  Genomic regions flanking E-box binding sites influence DNA binding specificity of bHLH transcription factors through DNA shape. , 2013, Cell reports.

[40]  Kevin Struhl,et al.  NF-Y coassociates with FOS at promoters, enhancers, repetitive elements, and inactive chromatin regions, and is stereo-positioned with growth-controlling transcription factors , 2013, Genome research.

[41]  N. D. Clarke,et al.  Differential binding of the related transcription factors Pho4 and Cbf1 can tune the sensitivity of promoters to different levels of an induction signal , 2013, Nucleic acids research.

[42]  S. Henikoff,et al.  Regulation of nucleosome dynamics by histone modifications , 2013, Nature Structural &Molecular Biology.

[43]  Bradley E. Bernstein,et al.  Genome-wide Chromatin State Transitions Associated with Developmental and Environmental Cues , 2013, Cell.

[44]  T. Przytycka,et al.  Transcription dependent dynamic supercoiling is a short-range genomic force , 2013, Nature Structural &Molecular Biology.

[45]  Mikhail Pachkov,et al.  Modeling of epigenome dynamics identifies transcription factors that mediate Polycomb targeting , 2013, Genome research.

[46]  Hui Li,et al.  Genome-Wide Analysis of Histone Modifications : H 3 K 4 me 2 , H 3 K 4 me 3 , H 3 K 9 ac , and H 3 K 27 ac in Oryza sativa L . Japonica , 2013 .

[47]  R. Mann,et al.  Disentangling the many layers of eukaryotic transcriptional regulation. , 2012, Annual review of genetics.

[48]  D. Figarella-Branger,et al.  The selector gene Pax7 dictates alternate pituitary cell fates through its pioneer action on chromatin remodeling. , 2012, Genes & development.

[49]  William Stafford Noble,et al.  Sequence features and chromatin structure around the genomic regions bound by 119 human transcription factors , 2012, Genome research.

[50]  E. Furlong,et al.  Transcription factors: from enhancer binding to developmental control , 2012, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[51]  ENCODEConsortium,et al.  An Integrated Encyclopedia of DNA Elements in the Human Genome , 2012, Nature.

[52]  Kristin R Brogaard,et al.  A base pair resolution map of nucleosome positions in yeast , 2012, Nature.

[53]  Jacob D. Jaffe,et al.  Quantitative Assessment of Chromatin Immunoprecipitation Grade Antibodies Directed against Histone Modifications Reveals Patterns of Co-occurring Marks on Histone Protein Molecules* , 2012, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics.

[54]  R. Mann,et al.  Cofactor Binding Evokes Latent Differences in DNA Binding Specificity between Hox Proteins , 2011, Cell.

[55]  J. Carroll,et al.  Pioneer transcription factors: establishing competence for gene expression. , 2011, Genes & development.

[56]  J. Eeckhoute,et al.  Pioneer factors: directing transcriptional regulators within the chromatin environment. , 2011, Trends in genetics : TIG.

[57]  Nathan C. Sheffield,et al.  Open chromatin defined by DNaseI and FAIRE identifies regulatory elements that shape cell-type identity. , 2011, Genome research.

[58]  Steven Henikoff,et al.  Histone modification: cause or cog? , 2011, Trends in genetics : TIG.

[59]  C. Müller,et al.  Recognizing and remodeling the nucleosome. , 2011, Current opinion in structural biology.

[60]  G. Stormo,et al.  Quantitative analysis demonstrates most transcription factors require only simple models of specificity , 2011, Nature Biotechnology.

[61]  E. Birney,et al.  High-resolution genome-wide in vivo footprinting of diverse transcription factors in human cells. , 2011, Genome research.

[62]  Jacob F. Degner,et al.  Sequence and Chromatin Accessibility Data Accurate Inference of Transcription Factor Binding from Dna Material Supplemental Open Access , 2022 .

[63]  William Stafford Noble,et al.  FIMO: scanning for occurrences of a given motif , 2011, Bioinform..

[64]  Ryan A. Flynn,et al.  A unique chromatin signature uncovers early developmental enhancers in humans , 2011, Nature.

[65]  H. Madhani,et al.  Chromodomain-mediated oligomerization of HP1 suggests a nucleosome-bridging mechanism for heterochromatin assembly. , 2011, Molecular cell.

[66]  R. Young,et al.  Histone H3K27ac separates active from poised enhancers and predicts developmental state , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[67]  Z. Weng,et al.  Sequence features that drive human promoter function and tissue specificity. , 2010, Genome research.

[68]  Michael B. Stadler,et al.  Accessibility of the Drosophila genome discriminates PcG repression, H4K16 acetylation and replication timing , 2010, Nature Structural &Molecular Biology.

[69]  R. Mann,et al.  Origins of specificity in protein-DNA recognition. , 2010, Annual review of biochemistry.

[70]  Aaron R. Quinlan,et al.  Bioinformatics Applications Note Genome Analysis Bedtools: a Flexible Suite of Utilities for Comparing Genomic Features , 2022 .

[71]  J. Zlatanova,et al.  Nucleosome assembly depends on the torsion in the DNA molecule: a magnetic tweezers study. , 2009, Biophysical journal.

[72]  R. Mann,et al.  The role of DNA shape in protein-DNA recognition , 2009, Nature.

[73]  William Stafford Noble,et al.  Global mapping of protein-DNA interactions in vivo by digital genomic footprinting , 2009, Nature Methods.

[74]  Yuka Kanno,et al.  Global mapping of H3K4me3 and H3K27me3 reveals specificity and plasticity in lineage fate determination of differentiating CD4+ T cells. , 2009, Immunity.

[75]  R. Mann,et al.  Chapter 3 Hox Specificity , 2009 .

[76]  R. Mann,et al.  Hox specificity unique roles for cofactors and collaborators. , 2009, Current topics in developmental biology.

[77]  E. Birney,et al.  Pfam: the protein families database , 2013, Nucleic Acids Res..

[78]  Cole Trapnell,et al.  Ultrafast and memory-efficient alignment of short DNA sequences to the human genome , 2009, Genome Biology.

[79]  Anthony P. Fejes,et al.  Genome-wide relationship between histone H3 lysine 4 mono- and tri-methylation and transcription factor binding. , 2008, Genome research.

[80]  K. Shokat,et al.  The effect of H3K79 dimethylation and H4K20 trimethylation on nucleosome and chromatin structure , 2008, Nature Structural &Molecular Biology.

[81]  K. Shokat,et al.  The effect of H 3 K 79 dimethylation and H 4 K 20 trimethylation on nucleosome and chromatin structure , 2008 .

[82]  Giacomo Finocchiaro,et al.  Myc-binding-site recognition in the human genome is determined by chromatin context , 2006, Nature Cell Biology.

[83]  S. Elgin,et al.  The contradictory definitions of heterochromatin: transcription and silencing , 2006, Chromosoma.

[84]  M. Pazin,et al.  Histone H4-K16 Acetylation Controls Chromatin Structure and Protein Interactions , 2006, Science.

[85]  Thomas Lengauer,et al.  ROCR: visualizing classifier performance in R , 2005, Bioinform..

[86]  Eric S. Lander,et al.  Genomic Maps and Comparative Analysis of Histone Modifications in Human and Mouse , 2005, Cell.

[87]  D. Moazed,et al.  Heterochromatin and Epigenetic Control of Gene Expression , 2003, Science.

[88]  D. Higgs,et al.  Deletion of the mouse alpha-globin regulatory element (HS -26) has an unexpectedly mild phenotype. , 2002, Blood.

[89]  J. Widom,et al.  Effects of histone acetylation on the equilibrium accessibility of nucleosomal DNA target sites. , 2001, Journal of molecular biology.

[90]  P. Bucher,et al.  DNA Binding Specificity of Different STAT Proteins , 2001, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[91]  P. Wright,et al.  Zinc finger proteins: new insights into structural and functional diversity. , 2001, Current opinion in structural biology.

[92]  R. Kornberg,et al.  Twenty-Five Years of the Nucleosome, Fundamental Particle of the Eukaryote Chromosome , 1999, Cell.

[93]  Bernhard Lüscher,et al.  Characterization of the Transcriptional Regulator YY1 , 1997, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[94]  Wen‐Ming Yang,et al.  Transcriptional repression by YY1 is mediated by interaction with a mammalian homolog of the yeast global regulator RPD3. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[95]  E. Moran,et al.  Relief of YY1 transcriptional repression by adenovirus E1A is mediated by E1A-associated protein p300. , 1995, Genes & development.

[96]  M Lappé,et al.  Genetic control. , 1972, The New England journal of medicine.