Journal impact factors: implications for the nursing profession.

BACKGROUND The journal impact factor (IF) has become widely used as an absolute measure of the quality of professional journals. It is also increasingly used as a tool for measuring the academic performance of researchers and to inform decisions concerning the appointment and tenure of academic staff as well as the viability of their departments/schools. In keeping with these IF-related trends, nurse researchers and faculty the world over are being increasingly expected to publish only in journals that have a high IF and to abandon all other forms of publishing (including books and book chapters) that do not attract IF rankings. ISSUES The IF obsession is placing in jeopardy the sustainability and hence viability of nursing journals and academic nursing publication lists (academic texts). If nurse authors abandon their publishing agenda and publish only in 'elite' journals (many of which may be outside nursing), the capacity of the nursing profession to develop and control the cutting edge of its disciplinary knowledge could be placed at risk. ACTIONS Other means for assessing the quality and impact of nursing journals need to be devised. In addition, other works (such as books and book chapters) need also to be included in quality metrics. Nurse authors and journal editors must work together and devise ways to ensure the sustainability and viability of nursing publications.

[1]  E. Garfield Fortnightly Review: How can impact factors be improved? , 1996 .

[2]  P. Seglen,et al.  Citations and journal impact factors: questionable indicators of research quality , 1997, Allergy.

[3]  M. Freda Don Quixote, David and me. , 2006, Nursing outlook.

[4]  Luis Benítez-Bribiesca,et al.  The ups and downs of the impact factor: the case of Archives of Medical Research. , 2002, Archives of medical research.

[5]  E. Garfield The history and meaning of the journal impact factor. , 2006, JAMA.

[6]  A. Jones,et al.  Impact factors of forensic science and toxicology journals: what do the numbers really mean? , 2003, Forensic science international.

[7]  A A Sandberg,et al.  The journal "impact factor": a misnamed, misleading, misused measure. , 1998, Cancer genetics and cytogenetics.

[8]  M. Chan,et al.  Risk factors for citation errors in peer-reviewed nursing journals. , 2001, Journal of advanced nursing.

[9]  P. Seglen,et al.  Education and debate , 1999, The Ethics of Public Health.

[10]  Richard Smith,et al.  Journal accused of manipulating impact factor , 1997 .

[11]  Martin Frank,et al.  Impact factors: arbiter of excellence? , 2002, Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA.

[12]  Andrew P Kurmis,et al.  Understanding the limitations of the journal impact factor. , 2003, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[13]  E. Garfield Citation indexes for science. A new dimension in documentation through association of ideas. 1955. , 1955, International journal of epidemiology.

[14]  Richard M Shewchuk,et al.  Beyond rankings: using cognitive mapping to understand what health care journals represent. , 2006, Social science & medicine.

[15]  S. Bloch,et al.  Counting on citations: a flawed way to measure quality , 2003, The Medical journal of Australia.

[16]  Junping Qiu,et al.  Research on the Relationships between Chinese Journal Impact Factors and External Web Link Counts and Web Impact Factors , 2004 .

[17]  J. Neuberger,et al.  Impact factors: uses and abuses , 2002, European journal of gastroenterology & hepatology.

[18]  Robert West,et al.  What do citation counts count for in the field of addiction? An empirical evaluation of citation counts and their link with peer ratings of quality. , 2002, Addiction.

[19]  L. Butler A list of published papers is no measure of value , 2002, Nature.

[20]  L. Copp Characteristics of a quality journal. , 1988, Journal of professional nursing : official journal of the American Association of Colleges of Nursing.

[21]  D Ugolini,et al.  Low impact factor of Italian journals: another aspect of the poor research funding? , 2005, European journal of cancer.

[22]  Christine Urquhart,et al.  From epistemic origins to journal impact factors: What do citations tell us? , 2006, International journal of nursing studies.

[23]  E. Garfield Journal impact factor: a brief review. , 1999, CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne.

[24]  P. Lawrence The politics of publication , 2003, Nature.

[25]  G. Smith Impact factors in anaesthesia journals. , 1996, British journal of anaesthesia.

[26]  A. Coats,et al.  Top of the charts: download versus citations in the International Journal of Cardiology. , 2005, International journal of cardiology.

[27]  A. Agrawal,et al.  Corruption of journal Impact Factors. , 2005, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[28]  R. Coleman,et al.  Impact factors: Use and abuse in biomedical research , 1999, The Anatomical record.

[29]  Julianne Cheek,et al.  What's in a Number? Issues in Providing Evidence of Impact and Quality of Research(ers) , 2006, Qualitative health research.

[30]  D. Armstrong The impact of papers in Sociology of Health and Illness: a bibliographic study. , 2003, Sociology of health & illness.

[31]  Miquel Porta,et al.  Mixing journal, article, and author citations, and other pitfalls in the bibliographic impact factor. , 2003, Cadernos de saude publica.