How Finland Serves Gifted and Talented Pupils

The purpose of this article is to provide an overview of the ways gifted and talented pupils are served in Finland. The trend toward individualism and freedom of choice as well as national policy affecting gifted education are discussed. Empirical research on Finnish teachers’ attitudes toward gifted education with respect to the national discussion on giftedness is reviewed. Special schools, programs, and summer camps designed for gifted and talented pupils are introduced. Finland’s strengths and weaknesses in supporting academic and creative talent through gifted programs are identified. A greater need to recognize the social and affective needs of gifted pupils is acknowledged.

[1]  M. Aksela,et al.  A Cross-Cultural Study of Gifted Students' Scientific, Societal, and Moral Questions Concerning Science , 2012 .

[2]  M. Aksela,et al.  Luma Science Education Centre , 2012 .

[3]  Hannele Niemi,et al.  The Societal Factors Contributing to Education and Schooling in Finland , 2012 .

[4]  K. Kumpulainen,et al.  Striving for Educational Equity and Excellence , 2012 .

[5]  R. Persson.  Ability climates in Europe as socially represented notability , 2011 .

[6]  Venla Bernelius,et al.  Osoitteenmukaisia oppimistuloksia? : kaupunkikoulujen eriytymisen vaikutus peruskoululaisten oppimistuloksiin Helsingissä , 2011 .

[7]  K. Tirri.  Combining Excellence and Ethics: Implications for Moral Education for the Gifted , 2010 .

[8]  Sonja Laine.  The Finnish public discussion of giftedness and gifted children , 2010 .

[9]  P. Nokelainen,et al.  How Morality and Religiosity Relate to Intelligence: A Case Study of Mathematically Gifted Adolescents , 2009 .

[10]  H. Neber,et al.  Values and Foundations in Gifted Education , 2007 .

[11]  Helena Thuneberg,et al.  Contributions of data mining for psycho‐educational research: what self‐organizing maps tell us about the well‐being of gifted learners , 2006 .

[12]  I. Ruokonen.  Estonian and Finnish gifted children in their learning environments , 2005 .

[13]  N. Schofield,et al.  Identified Pre-School Potential Giftedness and Its Relation to Academic Achievement and Self-Concept at the End of Finnish Comprehensive School. , 2003 .

[14]  Mary K. Tallent-Runnels,et al.  Cross-Cultural Predictors of Teachers' Attitudes toward Gifted Education: Finland, Hong Kong, and the United States , 2002 .

[15]  Susan B. Lucas.  The Individualization of Education: WebCT and Learning Styles in Language Instruction , 2002 .

[16]  Mary K. Tallent-Runnels,et al.  A Cross-Cultural Study of Teachers’ Attitudes Toward Gifted Children and Programs for Gifted Children , 2000 .

[17]  Eunice M. L. S. Alencar,et al.  Programs and Practices for Identifying and Nurturing Giftedness and Talent in Latin American Countries , 2000 .

[18]  K. Tirri.  How Finland Meets the Needs of Gifted and Talented Pupils , 1997 .

[19]  K. Tirri,et al.  How teachers perceive differentiation of education among the gifted and talented , 1994 .

[20]  Kurt A. Heller,et al.  International Handbook of Research and Development of Giftedness and Talent , 1993 .

[21]  J. Vantassel-Baska.  Educational Decision Making on Acceleration and Grouping , 1992 .

[22]  Peter Madgwick,et al.  The Prime Minister’s Office , 1991 .