Mechanisms of Electrode Induced Injury. Part 2: Clinical Experience

ABSTRACT. In the previous paper in this series, basic mechanisms of electrode related injuries were discussed. In this paper, the discussion begins with some of the clinical aspects of burns. This is followed by a summary of the clinical literature on injuries produced by surface and subdermal electrodes. This clinical literature demonstrates that most electrode burns are related to the presence of high frequency electric fields (RF) created either by an electrosurgical unit or a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scanner. A smaller number of lesions are produced by low current, long duration direct current (DC) stimulation and during high current stimulation such as defibrillation. A discussion of the clinical complications from indwelling intracranial electrodes centers on electrodes placed for deep brain stimulation (DBS) that are currently used therapeutically in a wide array of neurologic disorders. The probability of considering a post-implant MRI scan is high and the safety of such scans is the focus of discussion. A very small number of adverse incidents have indicated a downward revision in the specific absorption rate recommendations for MRI examination with those patients who present with indwelling DBS leads and internal pulse generators. Continued vigilance when any type of electrode is used is important.

[1]  S. Jones,et al.  Burns associated with electrocardiographic monitoring during magnetic resonance imaging. , 1996, Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries.

[2]  L. Geddes,et al.  Direct-Current Injury: Electrochemical Aspects , 2003, Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing.

[3]  M Hallett,et al.  The heating of metal electrodes during rapid-rate magnetic stimulation: a possible safety hazard. , 1992, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[4]  R. Kerber,et al.  Nature and determinants of skin "burns" after transthoracic cardioversion. , 1997, The American journal of cardiology.

[5]  Fatehi Mt,et al.  Burns in functional electric stimulation: two case reports. , 1987 .

[6]  Jean A. Tkach,et al.  Neurostimulation systems: Assessment of magnetic field interactions associated with 1.5‐ and 3‐Tesla MR systems , 2005, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[7]  K J Burchiel,et al.  DBS and diathermy interaction induces severe CNS damage , 2001, Neurology.

[8]  M. Stecker,et al.  Mechanisms of Electrode Induced Injury. Part 1: Theory , 2006, American journal of electroneurodiagnostic technology.

[9]  K Bachmann,et al.  Effects of magnetic resonance imaging on cardiac pacemakers and electrodes. , 1997, American heart journal.

[10]  Jean A. Tkach,et al.  Neurostimulation system used for deep brain stimulation (DBS): MR safety issues and implications of failing to follow safety recommendations. , 2004, Investigative radiology.

[11]  T. Chou,et al.  Skin injury in the operating room. , 1998, Injury.

[12]  Michael Gaetz,et al.  Intraoperative Electrode Burns , 2003, Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing.

[13]  Jean A. Tkach,et al.  Is magnetic resonance imaging safe for patients with neurostimulation systems used for deep brain stimulation? , 2005, Neurosurgery.

[14]  P. Dulguerov,et al.  A complication of intraoperative facial nerve monitoring: facial skin burns. , 1999, The American journal of otology.

[15]  Tamer S. Issa,et al.  DBS and diathermy interaction induces severe CNS damage , 2001, Neurology.

[16]  Shantanu Sinha,et al.  Bilateral neurostimulation systems used for deep brain stimulation: in vitro study of MRI-related heating at 1.5 T and implications for clinical imaging of the brain. , 2005, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[17]  Jean A. Tkach,et al.  Permanent Neurological Deficit Related to Magnetic Resonance Imaging in a Patient with Implanted Deep Brain Stimulation Electrodes for Parkinson’s Disease: Case Report , 2005, Neurosurgery.

[18]  H. D. Petersen,et al.  Skin changes following defibrillation. The effect of high voltage direct current. , 2003, Forensic science international.

[19]  Jorge Gonzalez-Martinez,et al.  MR imaging-related heating of deep brain stimulation electrodes: in vitro study. , 2002, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[20]  M Hallett,et al.  Risk of burns during rapid-rate magnetic stimulation in presence of electrodes , 1990, The Lancet.

[21]  D. Sharpe,et al.  Full-thickness burns following magnetic resonance imaging: a discussion of the dangers and safety suggestions. , 2004, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[22]  R. Rimdeika,et al.  Major full thickness skin burn injuries in premature neonate twins. , 2005, Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries.

[23]  R E Kerber,et al.  High perimeter impedance defibrillation electrodes reduce skin burns in transthoracic cardioversion. , 1998, The American journal of cardiology.

[24]  F. Shellock,et al.  MR safety in patients with implanted deep brain stimulation systems (DBS). , 2003, Acta neurochirurgica. Supplement.

[25]  Wolfgang Reith,et al.  Transient dystonia following magnetic resonance imaging in a patient with deep brain stimulation electrodes for the treatment of Parkinson disease. Case report. , 2003, Journal of neurosurgery.

[26]  Gilbert Jelen Acrylate, a hidden allergen of electrocardiogram electrodes , 2001, Contact dermatitis.