Abstract While China's 11th Five-Year Plan called for a reduction of energy intensity by 2010, whether and how the energy consumption trend can be changed in a short time has been hotly debated. This research intends to evaluate the impact of a variety of scenarios of gross domestic product (GDP) growth, energy elasticity and energy-efficiency improvement on energy consumption in commercial buildings in China using a detailed China End-Use Energy Model. China's official energy statistics have limited information on energy demand by end-use. This is a particularly pertinent issue for building energy consumption. The authors have applied reasoned judgments, based on experience of working on Chinese efficiency standards and energy-related programs, to present a realistic interpretation of the current energy data. The bottom-up approach allows detailed consideration of end-use intensity, equipment efficiency, etc., thus facilitating assessment of potential impacts of specific policy and technology changes on building energy use. The results suggest that: (1) commercial energy consumption in China's current statistics is underestimated by about 44%, and the fuel mix is misleading; (2) energy-efficiency improvements will not be sufficient to offset the strong increase in end-use penetration and intensity in commercial buildings; (3) energy intensity (particularly electricity) in commercial buildings will increase; (4) different GDP growth and elasticity scenarios could lead to a wide range of floor area growth trajectories, and therefore, significantly impact energy consumption in commercial buildings.
[1]
Lee Schipper,et al.
Energy Efficiency and Human Activity: Past Trends, Future Prospects
,
1992
.
[2]
Jiang Kejun,et al.
China energy databook
,
1992
.
[3]
David Fridley,et al.
Achieving China's Target for Energy Intensity Reduction in 2010: A exploration of recent trends and possible future scenarios
,
2006
.
[4]
Kang Yanbing,et al.
Analysis of the impacts of building energy efficiency policies and technical improvements on China's future energy demand
,
2005
.
[5]
Mark D. Levine,et al.
Changing energy intensity in Chinese industry: The relatively importance of structural shift and intensity change
,
1994
.