Fetal distress evaluation using and analyzing the variables of antepartum computerized cardiotocography

ObjectiveIn this study, we tried to establish cut-off values for more than one parameters of computerized cardiotocography (c CTG) in the prediction of fetal distress during labor, using a group of pregnant women with low-risk pregnancies.MethodA retrospective study was performed. Data were collected from 167 patients for measurements of fetal heart rate (FHR) variables and perinatal outcome. Computerized CTG was performed with an Oxford Sonicaid monitor with connection to a 8000 system for CTG spontaneous analysis. The following c CTG variables were considered: FHR, number of accelerations, the presence and the number of episodes of high and low variation, the number of decelerations, short-term variation (STV), peaks of contractions (per hour) and fetal movements assessed by maternal perception (per hour). Computerized CTG recordings started not earlier than the beginning of week 38 of gestation. Immediately after delivery, blood sample was collected from umbilical artery for umbilical artery blood gas analysis (UBGA). The main UBGA parameter in cord umbilical artery that was considered for analysis was pH. pH values <7.25 were considered as suspicious for acidemia and pH values ≥7.25 as normal.ResultsWomen suspicious for fetal distress during labor presented significantly lower fetal movements (P = 0.026), accelerations (P = 0.018), variability (P < 0.001), number of high episodes (P < 0.001), higher values of FHR baseline (P < 0.001) and low episodes (P < 0.001). Only the number of decelerations did not differ significantly between the two groups (P = 0.545). The cut-off points of 5.00 for STV and 3.00 for high episodes were determined to classify women with fetal distress, which yielded high sensitivities (34 and 52%) and specificities (96.6 and 94.9%), with positive predictive values of 81.0 and 81.3% and negative predictive values of 77.4 and 82.2%, respectively.ConclusionsIn conclusion, we believe that not only STV but also other components of the cCTG, mainly the presence and the number of episodes of high variation, are related to pregnancy’s outcome as measured by an umbilical artery pH.

[1]  F. Facchinetti,et al.  The computerized fetal heart rate analysis in post-term pregnancy identifies patients at risk for fetal distress in labour. , 2006, European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology.

[2]  P. Nielsen,et al.  Intra‐ and inter‐observer variability in the assessment of intrapartum cardiotocograms , 1987 .

[3]  Z. Weiner,et al.  Computerized Analysis of the Fetal Heart Rate , 1995, Clinical obstetrics and gynecology.

[4]  B Stigsby,et al.  Intra- and inter-observer variability in the assessment of intrapartum cardiotocograms. , 1988, Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica.

[5]  J. Bernardes,et al.  Objective computerized fetal heart rate analysis , 1998, International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics.

[6]  S. Yi,et al.  Spectral analysis of fetal heart rate variability as a predictor of intrapartum fetal distress , 2001, International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics.

[7]  A. Vintzileos,et al.  The Efficacy of Individual Computer Heart Rate Indices in Detecting Acidemia at Birth in Growth‐Restricted Fetuses , 1996, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[8]  S. Giannubilo,et al.  Computerized analysis of the fetal heart rate in pregnancies complicated by preterm premature rupture of membranes (pPROM) , 2006, The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine : the official journal of the European Association of Perinatal Medicine, the Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies, the International Society of Perinatal Obstetricians.

[9]  Charalambos Chrelias,et al.  Fetal pulse oximetry and wavelet analysis of the fetal heart rate in the evaluation of abnormal cardiotocography tracings , 2006, The journal of obstetrics and gynaecology research.

[10]  D Maulik,et al.  Computerized analysis of fetal heart rate variation in postterm pregnancy: prediction of intrapartum fetal distress and fetal acidosis. , 1994, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[11]  G S Dawes,et al.  Improvements in computerized fetal heart rate analysis antepartum , 1996, Journal of perinatal medicine.

[12]  João Bernardes,et al.  Prediction of neonatal state by computer analysis of fetal heart rate tracings: the antepartum arm of the SisPorto multicentre validation study. , 2005, European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology.

[13]  G. Vozzi,et al.  Antepartum computerized CTG and neonatal acid‐base status at birth , 1999, International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics.

[14]  A. Moron,et al.  Fetal acidemia prediction through short-term variation assessed by antepartum computerized cardiotocography in pregnant women with hypertension syndrome , 2008, Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics.

[15]  S. Agrawal,et al.  Intrapartum computerized fetal heart rate parameters and metabolic acidosis at birth. , 2003, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[16]  T. Todros,et al.  Fetal heart rate tracings: observers versus computer assessment. , 1996, European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology.

[17]  Sergio Cerutti,et al.  Comparison of entropy-based regularity estimators: application to the fetal heart rate signal for the identification of fetal distress , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[18]  E. Zimmer,et al.  Computerized analysis of fetal heart rate after maternal glucose ingestion in normal pregnancy. , 2000, European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology.

[19]  D. Arduini,et al.  Role of antepartum computerized fetal heart rate analysis in the prediction of fetal distress during labor. , 1997, European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology.