Discovering Variables that Affect MANET Protocol Performance

Mobile Ad Hoc Networks (MANETs) are usually studied through simulation. Network simulators allow users, in principle, to set values for several hundred variables. A few of these variables, including node speed, node pause time, and packet size, receive much of the attention in MANET simulation studies, because their values are generally believed to have an important effect on simulation results (e.g., delivery ratio). There are, however, a number of variables that are less discussed, but which have a substantially greater effect on simulation results than those more commonly considered. Given a typical simulation scenario, we demonstrate that variables such as the number of sources and random versus fixed destinations, which have received comparatively little attention in the literature, have a substantially greater impact on delivery ratio than do variables such as node speed and pause time, which have received significant attention in the literature. Failure to consider the values of these variables in simulation studies can result in misleading conclusions regarding the performance of routing protocols. We conclude that before investigators draw firm conclusions about the performance of a MANET routing protocol, they should examine the effects of a wider variety of variables than has generally been the practice.

[1]  Tracy Camp,et al.  MANET simulation studies: the incredibles , 2005, MOCO.

[2]  Madhav V. Marathe,et al.  Characterizing the interaction between routing and MAC protocols in ad-hoc networks , 2002, MobiHoc '02.

[3]  A. Atkinson Subset Selection in Regression , 1992 .

[4]  Charles B. Owen,et al.  Factors affecting the performance of ad hoc networks , 2002, 2002 IEEE International Conference on Communications. Conference Proceedings. ICC 2002 (Cat. No.02CH37333).

[5]  Krzysztof Pawlikowski,et al.  On credibility of simulation studies of telecommunication networks , 2002, IEEE Commun. Mag..

[6]  Tracy Camp,et al.  Performance comparison of two location based routing protocols for ad hoc networks , 2002, Proceedings.Twenty-First Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies.

[7]  Nitin H. Vaidya,et al.  Location-aided routing (LAR) in mobile ad hoc networks , 1998, MobiCom '98.

[8]  Tracy Camp,et al.  Stationary distributions for the random waypoint mobility model , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing.

[9]  Violet R. Syrotiuk,et al.  Factor interaction on service delivery in mobile ad hoc networks , 2004, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications.

[10]  Charles E. Perkins,et al.  Ad hoc On-Demand Distance Vector (AODV) Routing , 2001, RFC.

[11]  Charles E. Perkins,et al.  Ad-hoc on-demand distance vector routing , 1999, Proceedings WMCSA'99. Second IEEE Workshop on Mobile Computing Systems and Applications.

[12]  Dmitri D. Perkins,et al.  Using statistical design of experiments for analyzing mobile ad hoc networks , 2005, MSWiM '05.

[13]  Krzysztof Pawlikowski,et al.  Do Not Trust All Simulation Studies of Telecommunication Networks , 2003, ICOIN.

[14]  Alan J. Miller Subset Selection in Regression , 1992 .