Hand anthropometry survey for the Jordanian population

This paper presents the results of an anthropometric study of the hand from a sample of 120 female and 115 male adults from four major cities in Jordan. The mean, standard deviation, and various percentiles are summarized in tables and, for each dimension, a comparison is made between genders, using t-tests. Comparisons between Jordanians and other populations (Bangladeshis, Nigerians, Vietnamese Americans, Hong Kong Chinese, United Kingdom residents, Americans, and Mexicans) are also made, using published data on the latter. The results showed many significant differences between Jordanians and the other populations, but it was difficult to draw broad generalizations. The results of this study are expected to influence the design or selection of hand tools imported into Jordan from industrialized countries and to provide the impetus for more anthropometric studies on Jordanians that relate to the design of equipment for work and other activities. Relevance to industry This study provides data on hand anthropometry that would be useful for the design of hand tools for Jordanians, and also for selecting appropriately sized tools to be imported from the industrialized countries for use in the Jordanian industrial workplace. r 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

[1]  A Mital,et al.  Injuries due to handtools. Results of a questionnaire. , 1987, Applied ergonomics.

[2]  J W Garrett,et al.  The Adult Human Hand: Some Anthropometric and Biomechanical Considerations , 1971, Human factors.

[3]  S N Imrhan,et al.  Male torque strength in simulated oil rig tasks: the effects of grease-smeared gloves and handle length, diameter and orientation. , 1999, Applied ergonomics.

[4]  Mahmut Eksioglu,et al.  Relative optimum grip span as a function of hand anthropometry , 2004 .

[5]  K. Krishan,et al.  Estimation of stature from dimensions of hands and feet in a North Indian population. , 2007, Journal of forensic and legal medicine.

[6]  Prakash C. Dhara,et al.  An Investigation of Hand Anthropometry of Agricultural Workers , 2003 .

[7]  J. Winkel,et al.  Hand strength: the influence of grip span and grip type. , 1991, Ergonomics.

[8]  Patrick G. Dempsey,et al.  Isometric muscle strength and anthropometric characteristics of a Chinese sample , 2005 .

[9]  L P Gite,et al.  Anthropometric survey for agricultural machinery design: an Indian case study. , 1989, Applied ergonomics.

[10]  Sheik N. Imrhan,et al.  Hand anthropometry in a sample of Bangladesh males , 2006 .

[11]  S W Meagher,et al.  Tool design for prevention of hand and wrist injuries. , 1987, The Journal of hand surgery.

[12]  Timothy J. Newby,et al.  Economically designed job aids , 1989 .

[13]  E Rosenblad-Wallin An anthropometric study as the basis for sizing anatomically designed mittens. , 1987, Applied ergonomics.

[14]  M. G. Contreras,et al.  Hand anthropometry in a sample of Mexicans in the US Mexico border region , 2005 .

[15]  Rod J. Graves,et al.  Using ergonomics in engineering design to improve health and safety , 1992 .

[16]  A. J. Courtney,et al.  Hand anthropometry of Hong Kong Chinese females compared to other ethnic groups. , 1984, Ergonomics.

[17]  G. V. Prasanna Kumar,et al.  Anthropometric dimensions of farm youth of the north eastern region of India , 2005 .

[18]  C. Nicolay,et al.  Grip strength and endurance: Influences of anthropometric variation, hand dominance, and gender , 2005 .

[19]  A. Fahri Ozok,et al.  A new approach to estimate anthropometric measurements by adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system , 2003 .

[20]  P Loslever,et al.  Biomechanical and epidemiological investigation of carpal tunnel syndrome at workplaces with high risk factors. , 1993, Ergonomics.

[21]  A J Courtney,et al.  Hong Kong female hand dimensions and machine guarding. , 1984, Ergonomics.

[22]  I Minto,et al.  A comparison of hand anthropometry of females in three ethnic groups. , 1980, Ergonomics.

[23]  Ajay Verma,et al.  Anthropometric survey of Indian farm workers to approach ergonomics in agricultural machinery design. , 2002, Applied ergonomics.

[24]  W G Lewis,et al.  Design and sizing of ergonomic handles for hand tools. , 1993, Applied ergonomics.

[25]  Houshang Shahnavaz,et al.  Body size variability between people in developed and developing countries and its impact on the use of imported goods , 1989 .

[26]  Heinz Schmidtke Ergonomic data for equipment design , 1984 .

[27]  Yunis A.A. Mohammad,et al.  Anthropometric characteristics of the hand based on laterality and sex among Jordanian , 2005 .

[28]  Janet M. Twomey,et al.  Predicting peak pinch strength: Artificial neural networks vs. regression , 1996 .

[29]  O O Okunribido,et al.  A survey of hand anthropometry of female rural farm workers in Ibadan, Western Nigeria , 2000, Ergonomics.

[30]  Sheik N. Imrhan,et al.  Hand anthropometry of Americans of Vietnamese origin , 1993 .

[31]  Katharyn A. Grant,et al.  An analysis of handle designs for reducing manual effort: The influence of grip diameter , 1992 .

[32]  J. Krutch,et al.  The Measure of Man , 1953 .

[33]  Anjali Nag,et al.  Hand anthropometry of Indian women. , 2003, The Indian journal of medical research.

[34]  Jinky Leilanie Del Prado-Lu Anthropometric measurement of Filipino manufacturing workers , 2007 .

[35]  B. Buchholz,et al.  Anthropometric data for describing the kinematics of the human hand. , 1992, Ergonomics.

[36]  R. D. Ray,et al.  Trends in Ergonomics/Human Factors II , 1985 .