Metamaterial-Inspired Efficient Electrically Small Antennas

Planar two-dimensional (2D) and volumetric three-dimensional (3D) metamaterial-inspired efficient electrically-small antennas that are easy to design; are easy and inexpensive to build; and are easy to test; are reported, i.e., the EZ antenna systems. The proposed 2D and 3D electrical- and magnetic-based EZ antennas are shown to be naturally matched to a 50 source, i.e., without the introduction of a matching network. It is demonstrated numerically that these EZ antennas have high radiation efficiencies with very good impedance matching between the source and the antenna and, hence, that they have high overall efficiencies. The reported 2D and 3D EZ antenna designs are linearly scalable to a wide range of frequencies and yet maintain their easy-to-build characteristics. Several versions of the 2D EZ antennas were fabricated and tested. The measurement results confirm the performance predictions. The EZ antennas systems may provide attractive alternatives to existing electrically-small antennas.

[1]  A. Erentok,et al.  Characterization of a volumetric metamaterial realization of an artificial magnetic conductor for antenna applications , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation.

[2]  L. J. Chu,et al.  Physical limitations of omnidirectional antennas , 1948 .

[3]  R. Collin,et al.  Evaluation of antenna Q , 1964 .

[4]  N. Serafimov,et al.  Comparison between radiation efficiencies of phone antennas and radiated power of mobile phones measured in anechoic chambers and reverberation chamber , 2002, IEEE Antennas and Propagation Society International Symposium (IEEE Cat. No.02CH37313).

[5]  Richard W. Ziolkowski,et al.  Low frequency lumped element-based negative index metamaterial , 2007 .

[6]  H.A. Wheeler,et al.  Fundamental Limitations of Small Antennas , 1947, Proceedings of the IRE.

[7]  L. J. Chu Physical Limitations of Omni‐Directional Antennas , 1948 .

[8]  Private Communications , 2001 .

[9]  Richard W. Ziolkowski,et al.  An efficient metamaterial‐inspired electrically‐small antenna , 2007 .

[10]  Dennis G. Camell,et al.  Evaluation of the NASA Langley Research Center mode-stirred chamber facility , 1999 .

[11]  A. Erentok,et al.  A Hybrid Optimization Method to Analyze Metamaterial-Based Electrically Small Antennas , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation.

[12]  R. Hansen,et al.  Fundamental limitations in antennas , 1981, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[13]  A.C. Newell,et al.  Single-Negative, Double-Negative, and Low-index Metamaterials and their Electromagnetic Applications , 2007, IEEE Antennas and Propagation Magazine.

[14]  Richard W Ziolkowski,et al.  Reciprocity between the effects of resonant scattering and enhanced radiated power by electrically small antennas in the presence of nested metamaterial shells. , 2005, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[15]  A. Erentok,et al.  At and below the chu limit: passive and active broad bandwidth metamaterial-based electrically small antennas , 2007 .

[16]  R. Harrington Time-Harmonic Electromagnetic Fields , 1961 .

[17]  Richard W. Ziolkowski,et al.  Application of double negative materials to increase the power radiated by electrically small antennas , 2003 .

[18]  S. A Re-Examination of the Fundamental Limits on the Radiation Q of Electrically Small Antennas , 2008 .

[19]  Ieee Standards Board,et al.  IEEE standard definitions of terms for antennas , 1993 .

[20]  Christopher L. Holloway,et al.  On the Use of Reverberation Chambers to Simulate a Controllable Rician Radio Environment for the Testing of Wireless Devices. | NIST , 2006 .

[21]  N. Engheta,et al.  A positive future for double-negative metamaterials , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques.

[22]  D. Pozar,et al.  Comparison of three methods for the measurement of printed antenna efficiency , 1988 .

[23]  P.-S. Kildal,et al.  Characterization of antennas for mobile and wireless terminals by using reverberation chambers: improved accuracy by platform stirring , 2001, IEEE Antennas and Propagation Society International Symposium. 2001 Digest. Held in conjunction with: USNC/URSI National Radio Science Meeting (Cat. No.01CH37229).

[24]  A. Erentok,et al.  Numerical Analysis of a Printed Dipole Antenna Integrated With a 3-D AMC Block , 2007, IEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters.

[25]  H. A. Wheeler The Radiansphere around a Small Antenna , 1959, Proceedings of the IRE.

[26]  A.D. Yaghjian,et al.  Impedance, bandwidth, and Q of antennas , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation.

[27]  D. Hill,et al.  On the Use of Reverberation Chambers to Simulate a Rician Radio Environment for the Testing of Wireless Devices , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation.

[28]  E. S. Gillespie,et al.  IEEE Standard Definitions of Terms for Antennas , 1993 .

[29]  R. Bansal,et al.  Antenna theory , 1983, IEEE Antennas and Propagation Society Newsletter.

[30]  Richard W. Ziolkowski,et al.  Metamaterial-based efficient electrically small antennas , 2006 .

[31]  N. Engheta,et al.  Metamaterials: Physics and Engineering Explorations , 2006 .