Survival Strategies: Doctoral Students’ Perceptions of Challenges and Coping Methods

Introduction By design, earning a doctorate degree is not a quick or easy process; otherwise, the educational value of the graduate school's terminal degree would be diminished. As noted by M. Jones (2013), attrition rates for doctoral students range from 33% to 70% (cf. Gardner & Gopaul, 2012; Ivankova & Stick, 2007; Jiranek, 2010; Kim & Otts, 2010). Further, a 2008 study conducted by the Council of Graduate Schools (CGS; Sowell, 2008) revealed that only 57% of doctoral students completed their degree programs within 10 years. The researchers in this CGS study examined 330 doctoral programs representing various disciplines over a 12-year period (Sowell, 2008). In a separate study of attrition rates at the doctoral level, Lovitts (2001) found that attrition rates can range from 30% to 50% depending on field of study, consistent with the CGS findings (Sowell, 2008). These and other studies (cf. M. Jones, 2013) provide evidence that time management and persistence have been challenges to success at the doctoral level. There are other obstacles to overcome as well. The first-year experience is a daunting one for doctoral students because many have to become re-acclimated to the learning environment after years in the workplace, in addition to adapting to the rigors of a doctoral research program (Wao & Onwuegbuzie, 2011; Witte & James, 1998). Numerous factors have been identified that can hinder a student's doctoral experience, such as financial and resource issues, difficult disciplines, accessibility of information, and progress monitoring (Neumann, 2012; Wao & Onwuegbuzie, 2011), as well as isolation (Ali & Kohun, 2006, 2007; Kohun & Ali, 2005; Lovitts, 2001). The first-year doctoral experience often leads to students questioning whether they made the correct decision to pursue a doctorate degree (Witte & James, 1998), leading to high attrition rates at this early stage of these students' doctoral programs (Jairam & Kahl Jr., 2012; Lott, Gardner, & Powers, 2010). Indeed, as noted by Ali and Kohun (2006), in the first year of their doctoral programs, students experience difficulties in adjusting to their new life of doctoral studies. Moreover, typically, the first year of the doctoral program yields the most difficult adjustment (Hockey, 1994). This adjustment likely is even more difficult for first-generation doctoral students (Gardner & Holley, 2011; Holley & Gardner, 2012). Beeler (1991) identified four stages wherein the actual adjustment occurs for new graduate students: unconscious incompetence (i.e., occurring upon entering the doctoral program wherein students have a limited idea about what is involved in the program either academically or socially), conscious incompetence (i.e., occurring after the students gain knowledge about the academic requirements during which time they become aware of their academic deficits), unconscious competence (i.e., occurs when students believe that they have acquired some competence in their fields of study but are mostly unaware of their competence, thereby leading them to feel competent unconsciously), and conscious competence (i.e., occurs when students have accumulated sufficient knowledge that they become aware of what they know). According to Beeler (1991), this adjustment process places a psychological burden that overwhelms some students. And students who are unable to cope with this psychological adjustment might fall behind relative to other students in their program, which might lead to them dropping out of the program. With the vast differences in attrition rates of doctoral students being 33% to 70% (cf. Gardner & Gopaul, 2012; Ivankova & Stick, 2007; Jiranek, 2010; Kim & Otts, 2010), researchers, through this collective case study, sought to determine the common experiences of select doctoral students and what motivated their persistence through their doctoral degree programs. No matter the rigor of the doctoral program, research has indicated that peripheral factors can have just as much impact on the attrition of doctoral programs as can the difficulty of the coursework. …

[1]  K. Roulston Considering quality in qualitative interviewing , 2010 .

[2]  Ruth Neumann,et al.  The doctoral education experience: diversity and complexity , 2003 .

[3]  K. Perreault,et al.  Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches , 2011 .

[4]  Vladimir Jiranek,et al.  Potential Predictors of Timely Completion among Dissertation Research Students at an Australian Faculty of Sciences , 2010 .

[5]  V. Anfara,et al.  Qualitative Analysis on Stage: Making the Research Process More Public , 2002 .

[6]  Karri A. Holley,et al.  Navigating the Pipeline: How Socio-Cultural Influences Impact First-Generation Doctoral Students. , 2012 .

[7]  John C. Weidman,et al.  Socialization of Doctoral Students to Academic Norms , 2003 .

[8]  Azad Ali,et al.  Dealing with Isolation Feelings in IS Doctoral Programs , 2006 .

[9]  D. Mechanic Students Under Stress: A Study in the Social Psychology of Adaptation , 1963 .

[10]  Peter Salovey,et al.  Challenges Facing Female Doctoral Students and Recent Graduates , 1999 .

[11]  B. Berelson Content analysis in communications research , 1952 .

[12]  Susan K Gardner Faculty Perspectives on Doctoral Student Socialization in Five Disciplines , 2010 .

[13]  Neil Salkind Encyclopedia of Measurement and Statistics , 2006 .

[14]  Anthony J. Onwuegbuzie,et al.  Beyond Words: Using Nonverbal Communication Data in Research to Enhance Thick Description and Interpretation , 2013 .

[15]  Susan K. Gardner,et al.  Conceptualizing Success in Doctoral Education: Perspectives of Faculty in Seven Disciplines , 2009 .

[16]  Susan K. Gardner,et al.  The Part-Time Doctoral Student Experience , 2012 .

[17]  Frederick Kohun ISOLATION FEELINGS IN DOCTORAL PROGRAMS: A CASE STUDY , 2005 .

[18]  Anthony J. Onwuegbuzie,et al.  A Model for Presenting Threats to Legitimation at the Planning and Interpretation Phases in the Quantitative, Qualitative, and Mixed Research Components of a Dissertation , 2012 .

[19]  Barrett Strong,et al.  I Heard It Through The Grapevine , 2013 .

[20]  D. McNeill Hand and Mind , 1995 .

[21]  Rebecca K. Frels,et al.  A Critical Dialectical Pluralistic Examination of the Lived Experience of Select Women Doctoral Students , 2014 .

[22]  Lynn F. Bufka,et al.  Stress, coping, and barriers to wellness among psychology graduate students. , 2012 .

[23]  Dharmananda Jairam,et al.  Navigating the Doctoral Experience: The Role of Social Support in Successful Degree Completion , 2012 .

[24]  N. Leech,et al.  Qualitative Data Analysis: A Compendium of Techniques and a Framework for Selection for School Psychology Research and Beyond. , 2008 .

[25]  B. Glaser The Constant Comparative Method of Qualitative Analysis , 1965 .

[26]  Michael Jones,et al.  Issues in Doctoral Studies-Forty Years of Journal Discussion: Where Have We Been and Where Are We Going? , 2013 .

[27]  Susan K. Gardner,et al.  Doctoral Student Attrition in the Stem Fields: An Exploratory Event History Analysis , 2009 .

[28]  John Hockey,et al.  New Territory: Problems of Adjusting to the First Year of a Social Science PhD. , 1994 .

[29]  Azad Ali,et al.  Dealing with Social Isolation to Minimize Doctoral Attrition - A Four Stage Framework , 2007 .

[30]  Hervé Abdi,et al.  Correspondence Analysis , 2014, Encyclopedia of Social Network Analysis and Mining.

[31]  Anthony J. Onwuegbuzie,et al.  Introduction: Toward a new research philosophy for addressing social justice issues: Critical dialectical pluralism 1.0 , 2013 .

[32]  Eirini Geraniou,et al.  The transitional stages in the PhD degree in mathematics in terms of students’ motivation , 2010 .

[33]  B. Glassner Students Under Stress , 2019, Contemporary Sociology: A Journal of Reviews.

[34]  Jeff M. Citty,et al.  My World Is Not My Doctoral Program…Or Is It?: Female Students' Perceptions of Well-Being , 2012 .

[35]  R. Gorden,et al.  Interviewing: Strategy, techniques, and tactics , 1987 .

[36]  B. Schneider,et al.  Standards for Reporting on Empirical Social Science Research in AERA Publications American Educational Research Association , 2006 .

[37]  Kathleen M. Carley Coding Choices for Textual Analysis: A Comparison of Content Analysis and Map Analysis , 1993 .

[38]  Kelly Coate,et al.  To prove myself at the highest level: The benefits of doctoral study , 2005 .

[39]  Margaret Morton,et al.  Experiences of Doctoral Students in Mathematics in New Zealand , 2001 .

[40]  M. Sala,et al.  Striving to Obtain a School-Work-Life Balance: The Full-Time Doctoral Student , 2013 .

[41]  Karri A. Holley,et al.  “Those invisible barriers are real”: The Progression of First-Generation Students Through Doctoral Education , 2011 .

[42]  Susan K. Gardner,et al.  Contrasting the Socialization Experiences of Doctoral Students in High- and Low-Completing Departments: A Qualitative Analysis of Disciplinary Contexts at One Institution , 2010 .

[43]  Dongbin Kim,et al.  The Effect of Loans on Time to Doctorate Degree: Differences by Race/Ethnicity, Field of Study, and Institutional Characteristics , 2010 .

[44]  Matthew B. Miles,et al.  Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook , 1994 .

[45]  Anthony J. Onwuegbuzie,et al.  A Mixed Research Investigation of Factors Related to Time to the Doctorate in Education , 2011 .

[46]  R. M. Rust Students Under Stress: A Study of the Social Psychology of Adaptation , 1964 .

[47]  N. Hoffart Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory , 2000 .

[48]  T. Dalgleish,et al.  Handbook of cognition and emotion , 1999 .

[49]  Anthony J. Onwuegbuzie,et al.  Emergent Data Analysis Techniques in Mixed Methods Research: A Synthesis , 2010 .

[50]  Waynne B. James,et al.  Cohort Partnerships: A Pragmatic Approach to Doctoral Research , 1998 .

[51]  Dewan Mahboob Hossain Qualitative Research Process , 2008 .

[52]  Susan K. Gardner Fitting the Mold of Graduate School: A Qualitative Study of Socialization in Doctoral Education , 2008 .

[53]  K. Lonka,et al.  Challenges of Becoming a Scholar: A Study of Doctoral Students' Problems and Well-Being , 2012 .

[54]  A. Strauss,et al.  The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research aldine de gruyter , 1968 .

[55]  Darla J. Twale,et al.  Socialization of Graduate and Professional Students in Higher Education, a Perilous Passage? , 2001 .

[56]  N. Ivankova,et al.  Students’ Persistence in a Distributed Doctoral Program in Educational Leadership in Higher Education: A Mixed Methods Study , 2007 .

[57]  Susan K. Gardner The Challenges of First‐Generation Doctoral Students , 2013 .

[58]  R. Stake Qualitative Case Studies. , 2005 .

[59]  K. Jensen The qualitative research process , 2013 .

[60]  N. Leech,et al.  Validity and Qualitative Research: An Oxymoron? , 2007 .

[61]  Susan K Gardner “I Heard it through the Grapevine”: Doctoral Student Socialization in Chemistry and History , 2007 .

[62]  Shauna J. Butterwick,et al.  Connectivity and Collectivity in a Doctoral Cohort Program: An Academic Memoir in Five Parts , 2011 .

[63]  Pat Bazeley,et al.  Analysing Qualitative Data: More Than 'Identifying Themes' , 2009 .

[64]  유창조 Naturalistic Inquiry , 2022, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[65]  Stress experienced by women doctoral students, need for support, and occupational sex typing: An interactional view , 1979 .

[66]  Kent D. Beeler Graduate Student Adjustment to Academic Life: A Four-Stage Framework. , 1991 .

[67]  J. Maxwell Understanding and Validity in Qualitative Research , 1992 .

[68]  Barbara E. Lovitts,et al.  Leaving the Ivory Tower: The Causes and Consequences of Departure from Doctoral Study , 2001 .

[69]  Nancy L. Leech,et al.  Interviewing the Interpretive Researcher: A Method for Addressing the Crises of Representation, Legitimation, and Praxis , 2008 .

[70]  Susan K. Gardner,et al.  The Development of Doctoral Students: Phases of Challenge and Support , 2009 .

[71]  N. Denzin,et al.  The Sage handbook of qualitative research, 3rd ed. , 2005 .

[72]  T. Dalgleish Basic Emotions , 2004 .

[73]  A. Onwuegbuzie Introduction: Putting the MIXED back into quantitative and qualitative research in educational research and beyond: Moving toward the radical middle , 2012 .

[74]  R. L. Arnstein Students Under Stress: A Study in the Social Psychology of Adaptation , 1979 .

[75]  N. Leech,et al.  An Array of Qualitative Data Analysis Tools: A Call for Data Analysis Triangulation. , 2007 .

[76]  Amanda J. Rockinson-Szapkiw,et al.  Hearing their voices: Factors doctoral candidates attribute to their persistence , 2012 .

[77]  M. Ford,et al.  Degree Progress of Women Doctoral Students: Factors that Constrain, Facilitate, and Differentiate , 2004 .