Integrated or isolated? The impact of public housing redevelopment on social network homophily

Do mixed income housing programs increase the poor's social network diversity? Using unique, longitudinal, egocentric social network data, this research investigates changes in social network homophily for both Vietnamese and English-speaking original residents of a public housing redevelopment site. Changes in mixing occur for both those who return and those who moved away, but only increases in ethnic mixing were associated with returning to the new site. Thus, changes in social networks may be associated with disruption rather moving to a mixed-income site. Vietnamese residents also experienced increases in ethnic diversity compared to English-speaking respondents. The results raise questions about the social mixing intent of such programs. The high expectations for social network benefits of income mixing housing programs should be tempered.

[1]  R. G. Kleit.  The role of neighborhood social networks in scattered‐site public housing residents’ search for jobs , 2001 .

[2]  Linda R. Tropp,et al.  A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory. , 2006, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[3]  Leonard S. Rubinowitz,et al.  Crossing the Class and Color Lines: From Public Housing to White Suburbia , 2000 .

[4]  M. Joseph.  Is mixed‐income development an antidote to urban poverty? , 2006 .

[5]  S. Clampet-Lundquist,et al.  HOPE VI relocation: Moving to new neighborhoods and building new ties , 2004 .

[6]  John R. Hipp,et al.  The Simultaneous Effect of Social Distance and Physical Distance on the Formation of Neighborhood Ties , 2009 .

[7]  R. Burt,et al.  Applied Network Analysis: A Methodological Introduction , 1983 .

[8]  S. Popkin.  A Decade of HOPE VI: Research Findings and Policy Challenges , 2004 .

[9]  D. Imbroscio.  “[U]Nited and Actuated by Some Common Impulse of Passion”1: Challenging the Dispersal Consensus in American Housing Policy Research , 2008 .

[10]  H. Gans.  Planning and Social Life: Friendship and Neighbor Relations in Suburban Communities , 1961 .

[11]  Job Search Networks and Strategies in Scattered-site Public Housing , 2002 .

[12]  X. Briggs.  Moving Up versus Moving Out: Neighborhood Effects in Housing Mobility Programs , 1997 .

[13]  R. G. Kleit.  HOPE VI New Communities: Neighborhood Relationships in Mixed-Income Housing , 2005 .

[14]  K. Campbell,et al.  Sources of Personal Neighbor Networks: Social Integration, Need, or Time? , 1992 .

[15]  Peggy Wireman.  Urban Neighborhoods, Networks, and Families: New Forms for Old Values , 1984 .

[16]  R. G. Kleit.  Neighborhood Relations in Suburban Scattered-Site and Clustered Public Housing , 2001 .

[17]  Ingrid Gould Ellen,et al.  Does neighborhood matter? Assessing recent evidence , 1997 .

[18]  J. Goering,et al.  Response to Review of Choosing a Better Life? Evaluating the Moving to Opportunity Social Experiment , 2003, Children, Youth and Environments.

[19]  G. Duncan,et al.  Neighborhood resources, racial segregation, and economic mobility: Results from the Gautreaux program , 2006 .

[20]  M. Joseph.  Early Resident Experiences at a New Mixed-Income Development in Chicago , 2008 .

[21]  Elijah Anderson,et al.  Streetwise: Race, Class, and Change in an Urban Community , 1992 .

[22]  C. Fischer.  To Dwell Among Friends , 1982 .

[23]  Robin Jacob,et al.  Moving to Opportunity for Fair Housing Demonstration Program , 2003 .

[24]  No More 'Bois Ball , 2007 .

[25]  G. Āllport.  The Nature of Prejudice , 1954 .

[26]  T. Pettigrew.  Intergroup contact theory. , 1998, Annual review of psychology.

[27]  H. Gans.  The Levittowners: Ways of Life and Politics in a New Suburban Community , 1967 .

[28]  A. Curley.  Draining or gaining? The social networks of public housing movers in Boston , 2009 .

[29]  R. Putnam.  E Pluribus Unum: Diversity and Community in the Twenty‐first Century The 2006 Johan Skytte Prize Lecture , 2007 .

[30]  Xavier de Souza Briggs,et al.  Brown kids in white suburbs: Housing mobility and the many faces of social capital , 1998 .

[31]  W. Michelson.  Man and his urban environment: A sociological approach, with revisions , 1976 .

[32]  Charles Kadushin,et al.  Social Networks and Urban Neighborhoods in New York City , 1992 .

[33]  P. V. Marsden,et al.  Core Discussion Networks of Americans , 1987 .

[34]  A. Agresti,et al.  Statistical Analysis of Qualitative Variation , 1978 .

[35]  Susan Greenbaum,et al.  BRIDGING TIES AT THE NEIGHBORHOOD LEVEL , 1982 .

[36]  G. Green,et al.  SOCIAL ISOLATION OF THE URBAN POOR: Race, Class, and Neighborhood Effects on Social Resources , 1997 .

[37]  T. Wessel.  Does diversity in urban space enhance intergroup contact and tolerance? , 2009 .

[38]  M. McPherson,et al.  Birds of a Feather: Homophily in Social Networks , 2001 .

[39]  W. Wilson.  The Truly Disadvantaged , 1987 .

[40]  Melvin L. Oliver.  THE URBAN BLACK COMMUNITY AS NETWORK: TOWARD A SOCIAL NETWORK PERSPECTIVE , 1988 .

[41]  Karen E. Campbell,et al.  Racial differences in urban neighboring , 1991 .

[42]  R. Chaskin,et al.  The Theoretical Basis for Addressing Poverty Through Mixed-Income Development , 2007 .