Flow properties of MK-based geopolymer pastes. A comparative study with standard Portland cement pastes.

Geopolymers are presented in many studies as alternatives to ordinary Portland cement. Previous studies have focused on their chemical and mechanical properties, their microstructures and their potential applications, but very few have focussed on their rheological behaviour. Our work highlights the fundamental differences in the flow properties, which exist between geopolymers made from metakaolin and Ordinary Portland Cement (OPC). We show that colloidal interactions between metakaolin particles are negligible and that hydrodynamic effects control the rheological behaviour. Metakaolin-based geopolymers can then be described as Newtonian fluids with the viscosity controlled mainly by the high viscosity of the suspending alkaline silicate solution and not by the contribution of direct contacts between metakaolin grains. This fundamental difference between geopolymers and OPC implies that developments made in cement technology to improve rheological behaviour such as plasticizers will not be efficient for geopolymers and that new research directions need to be explored.

[1]  Martin Schneider,et al.  Sustainable cement production—present and future , 2011 .

[2]  Robert J. Flatt,et al.  Concrete: An eco material that needs to be improved , 2012 .

[3]  E. Lesniewska,et al.  Conformation of adsorbed comb copolymer dispersants. , 2009, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.

[4]  Sheetal K. Agarwal,et al.  Compatibility of superplasticizers with different cements , 2000 .

[5]  P. Banfill,et al.  Alkali activated fly ash: effect of admixtures on paste rheology , 2009 .

[6]  Nicolas Roussel,et al.  Yield stress and bleeding of fresh cement pastes , 2012 .

[7]  François de Larrard,et al.  The rheology of fresh high-performance concrete , 1996 .

[8]  P. Coussot,et al.  Rheophysical classification of concentrated suspensions and granular pastes , 1999 .

[9]  Thierry Sedran,et al.  Mixture-proportioning of high-performance concrete , 2002 .

[10]  P. Coussot,et al.  Rheophysics of pastes: a review of microscopic modelling approaches. , 2007, Soft matter.

[11]  F. Puertas,et al.  Estabilidad de aditivos superplastificantes y reductores de la retracción en medios fuertemente básicos , 2004 .

[12]  C. Shi,et al.  New cements for the 21st century: The pursuit of an alternative to Portland cement , 2011 .

[13]  Kejin Wang,et al.  Investigation into Yield Behavior of Fresh Cement Paste: Model and Experiment , 2010 .

[14]  Nicolas Roussel,et al.  From ordinary rhelogy concrete to self compacting concrete: A transition between frictional and hydrodynamic interactions , 2008 .

[15]  P. Rossi.  Mechanical behaviour of metal-fibre reinforced concretes , 1992 .

[16]  Howard A. Barnes,et al.  Rotating vane rheometry — a review , 2001 .

[17]  Robert J. Flatt,et al.  Towards a prediction of superplasticized concrete rheology , 2004 .

[18]  P. Coussot,et al.  Macroscopic vs. local rheology of yield stress fluids , 2009 .

[19]  N. Roussel,et al.  Mechanical properties and compositional heterogeneities of fresh geopolymer pastes , 2013 .

[20]  F. Puertas,et al.  Effect of Superplasticizer and Shrinkage-Reducing Admixtures on Alkali-Activated Slag Pastes and Mortars , 2005 .

[21]  P. Aitcin,et al.  Retardation effect of superplasticizer on different cement fractions , 1987 .

[22]  Y. F. Houst,et al.  Adsorption of superplasticizer admixtures on alkali-activated slag pastes , 2009 .

[23]  C. Jolicoeur,et al.  Chemical admixture-cement interactions: Phenomenology and physico-chemical concepts , 1998 .

[24]  Phillip Frank Gower Banfill,et al.  Properties of alkali-activated fly ashes determined from rheological measurements , 2005 .

[25]  R. Pellenq,et al.  Electrostatic Attraction between Two Charged Surfaces: A (N,V,T) Monte Carlo Simulation , 1997 .

[26]  Donald E. Macphee,et al.  A physico-chemical basis for novel cementitious binders , 2011 .

[27]  Thomas J. Dougherty,et al.  A Mechanism for Non‐Newtonian Flow in Suspensions of Rigid Spheres , 1959 .

[28]  Ming Yang,et al.  Interparticle potential and sedimentation behavior of cement suspensions: Review and results from paste , 1997 .

[29]  Philippe Ciais,et al.  Update on CO2 emissions , 2010 .

[30]  Philippe Coussot,et al.  Steady state flow of cement suspensions: A micromechanical state of the art , 2010 .

[31]  J. Deventer,et al.  Understanding the relationship between geopolymer composition, microstructure and mechanical properties , 2005 .

[32]  H. Damme,et al.  Why Does Concrete Set?: The Nature of Cohesion Forces in Hardened Cement-Based Materials , 2004 .

[33]  Brian H. O'Connor,et al.  Chemical optimisation of the compressive strength of aluminosilicate geopolymers synthesised by sodium silicate activation of metakaolinite , 2003 .

[34]  Nicolas Roussel,et al.  Rheology of Fiber Reinforced Cementitious Materials: Classification and Prediction , 2010 .

[35]  Robert J. Flatt,et al.  Molecular design of comb-shaped polycarboxylate dispersants for environmentally friendly concrete , 2013 .

[36]  Nicolas Roussel,et al.  The origins of thixotropy of fresh cement pastes , 2012 .

[37]  D. H. Napper,et al.  Depletion stabilization and depletion flocculation , 1980 .