In search of Ariadne's thread: A review of the recent literature on rhetorical theory

Despite its apparent diversity and confusion, the recent literature reflects a consistent attempt to revise the “modern” conception of the relationship between rhetoric and epistemology. Recent scholars stress that rhetoric functions not only to transmit, but also to generate, knowledge. This epistemic view of rhetoric appears in a number of different forms, ranging from a moderate emendation of traditional theory to a radical, neo‐sophistic conception of language and reality. Such “postmodern” approaches challenge many of the metatheoretical assumptions of the discipline, including those that bear on the ethics of rhetoric and on the “subject‐matter” of rhetorical inquiry.

[1]  Gordon F. Hostettler.  George Saintbury's View of Rhetoric. , 1977 .

[2]  J. Bliese.  The Study of Rhetoric in the Twelfth Century. , 1977 .

[3]  Luke M. Reinsma.  Rhetoric in England: The age of Aelfric, 970–1020 , 1977 .

[4]  Richard A. Cherwitz.  Rhetoric as “a way of knowing”: An attenuation of the epistemological claims of the “new rhetoric” , 1977 .

[5]  Laura Crowell.  Three Sheers for Kenneth Burke. , 1977 .

[6]  E. G. Bormann.  Fetching good out of evil: A rhetorical use of calamity , 1977 .

[7]  Michael C. McGuire.  Mythic rhetoric in Mein Kampf: A structuralist critique , 1977 .

[8]  M. C. McGee.  The fall of Wellington: A case study of the relationship between theory, practice, and rhetoric in history , 1977 .

[9]  Stephen W. Littlejohn.  Symbolic interactionism as an approach to the study of human communication , 1977 .

[10]  P. Wander.  The rhetoric of science , 1976 .

[11]  C. Smith,et al.  The nature of issues: A constructive approach to situational rhetoric , 1976 .

[12]  John H. Timmis.  Christian rhetoric and the western church fathers , 1976 .

[13]  Robert L. Scott,et al.  On viewing rhetoric as epistemic: Ten years later , 1976 .

[14]  R. Enos.  The epistemology of Gorgias’ rhetoric: A re‐examination , 1976 .

[15]  S. M. Halloran.  Tradition and theory in rhetoric , 1976 .

[16]  George P. Boss,et al.  Essential attributes of the concept of charisma , 1976 .

[17]  A. Scult.  Perelman's universal audience: One perspective , 1976 .

[18]  J. Sproule.  The psychological burden of proof: On the evolutionary development of Richard Whately's theory of presumption , 1976 .

[19]  W. Jordan,et al.  I. A. Richards' concept of tenor‐vehicle interaction , 1976 .

[20]  Raymie E. McKerrow.  Campbell and Whately on the utility of syllogistic logic , 1976 .

[21]  K. Jamieson,et al.  Pascal vs. Descartes: A clash over rhetoric in the seventeenth century , 1976 .

[22]  Wilbur Samuel Howell.  Colloquy: II. The two‐party line: A reply to Kenneth Burke , 1976 .

[23]  K. Burke.  Colloquy: I. The party line , 1976 .

[24]  T. Farrell.  Knowledge, consensus, and rhetorical theory , 1976 .

[25]  Richard A. Engnell.  Implications for communication of the rhetorical epistemology of Gorgias of Leontini , 1973 .

[26]  Bruce E. Gronbeck.  Gorgias on rhetoric and poetic: A rehabilitation , 1972 .

[27]  Robert L. Scott,et al.  On viewing rhetoric as epistemic , 1967 .

[28]  Michael A. Overington.  The Scientific Community as Audience: Toward a Rhetorical Analysis of Science. , 1977 .

[29]  Ernesto Grassi,et al.  Rhetoric and Philosophy. , 1976 .

[30]  Vincent M. Bevilacqua.  Vico, "Process," and the Nature of Rhetorical Investigation: An Epistemological Perspective. , 1974 .

[31]  W. Booth.  Modern dogma and the rhetoric of assent , 1974 .

[32]  Ch. Perelman,et al.  The New Rhetoric: A Treatise on Argumentation , 1971 .

[33]  Robert E. Taylor.  Renaissance Books , 1970, Renaissance Quarterly.