Functional Outcomes in Monobloc Advancement by Distraction Using the Rigid External Distractor Device

Background: Craniofacial dysostosis syndromes produce multisutural synostoses combined with severe midfacial retrusion. This may cause serious functional problems, including airway obstruction, exposure of the eyes, visual pathway dysfunction, and raised intracranial pressure. Early midface advancement may be necessary to address these issues. Distraction osteogenesis has provided the facility to achieve significant advances safely and is often in excess of that which is achievable by conventional means. Methods: A retrospective study of 20 patients with craniofacial dysostosis and severe midface hypoplasia who underwent monobloc advancement osteotomies using the rigid external distractor system principally for functional reasons was undertaken. The multidisciplinary management and outcome measures of these patients were recorded. Results: The midface was distracted an average of 16.4 mm, with a range of 12 to 22 mm. Ocular protection was achieved in all patients with preoperative exposure keratopathy and/or globe subluxation. Improvements in optic disc swelling and pattern visually evoked potentials were seen in those patients with threatened visual impairment. Improvement in airway obstruction was seen in those patients with abnormal polysomnography. Decannulation was achieved in five of the seven patients with tracheostomies. Fifty percent had a reduction in hyponasality, and the visual appearance of speech was improved. Complications included persistent cerebrospinal fluid leakage, acquired hypernasality in 25 percent, cranial bone loss, and sinus formation requiring surgical revision. Conclusions: Monobloc distraction osteogenesis results in good aesthetic and functional outcomes. The relatively high rate of complications remains a concern, and further adaptations of technique are needed to reduce the risks of this procedure.

[1]  P. Chumas,et al.  Clinical management of craniosynostosis , 2006, Acta Neurochirurgica.

[2]  Dorothy A. Thompson,et al.  Sustained Raised Intracranial Pressure Implicated Only by Pattern Reversal Visual Evoked Potentials after Cranial Vault Expansion Surgery , 2003, Pediatric Neurosurgery.

[3]  B. Kalantarian,et al.  Rotation Advancement of the Midface by Distraction Osteogenesis , 2003, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[4]  R. Holmes,et al.  Midface Distraction following Le Fort III and Monobloc Osteotomies: Problems and Solutions , 2002, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[5]  S. R. Cohen,et al.  Craniofacial distraction with a modular internal distraction system: evolution of design and surgical techniques. , 1999, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[6]  D. Sell,et al.  GOS.SP.ASS.'98: an assessment for speech disorders associated with cleft palate and/or velopharyngeal dysfunction (revised). , 1999, International journal of language & communication disorders.

[7]  B. Toth,et al.  Le Fort III Advancement with Gradual Distraction Using Internal Devices , 1997, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[8]  A. Figueroa,et al.  Management of severe maxillary deficiency in childhood and adolescence through distraction osteogenesis with an external, adjustable, rigid distraction device. , 1997, The Journal of craniofacial surgery.

[9]  S. R. Cohen,et al.  Maxillary-midface distraction in children with cleft lip and palate: a preliminary report. , 1997, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[10]  F. Charbel,et al.  Monobloc craniomaxillofacial distraction osteogenesis in a newborn with severe craniofacial synostosis: a preliminary report. , 1995, The Journal of craniofacial surgery.

[11]  D. Sell,et al.  A screening assessment of cleft palate speech (Great Ormond Street Speech Assessment). , 1994, European journal of disorders of communication : the journal of the College of Speech and Language Therapists, London.

[12]  J. McCarthy,et al.  Lengthening the human mandible by gradual distraction. , 1992, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[13]  G A Ilizarov,et al.  The principles of the Ilizarov method. , 1988, Bulletin of the Hospital for Joint Diseases Orthopaedic Institute.

[14]  A. F. del Campo,et al.  ADVANCEMENT OF THE ORBITS AND THE MIDFACE IN ONE PIECE, COMBINED WITH FRONTAL REPOSITIONING, FOR THE CORRECTION OF CROUZON'S DEFORMITIES , 1978, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[15]  E. Niebuhr,et al.  [Apert's syndrome. Acrocephalosyndactylia, type I]. , 1973, Ugeskrift for laeger.

[16]  P. Tessier The definitive plastic surgical treatment of the severe facial deformities of craniofacial dysostosis. Crouzon's and Apert's diseases. , 1971 .