Prediction of perceptible artifacts in JPEG 2000-compressed chest CT images using mathematical and perceptual quality metrics.

OBJECTIVE The objective of our study was to determine whether peak signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR) and a perceptual quality metric (High-Dynamic Range Visual Difference Predictor [HDR-VDP]) can predict the presence of perceptible artifacts in Joint Photographic Experts Group (JPEG) 2000-compressed chest CT images. MATERIALS AND METHODS One hundred chest CT images were compressed to 5:1, 8:1, 10:1, and 15:1. Five radiologists determined if the original and compressed images were identical (negative response) or different (positive response). The correlation between the results for each metric and the number of readers with positive responses was evaluated using Spearman's rank correlation test. Using the pooled readers' responses as the reference standard, we performed receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis to determine the cutoff values balancing sensitivity and specificity and yielding 100% sensitivity in each metric. These cutoff values were then used to estimate the visually lossless thresholds for the compressions for the 100 original images, and the accuracy of the estimates of two metrics was compared (McNemar test). RESULTS The correlation coefficients were -0.918 and 0.925 for PSNR and the HDR-VDP, respectively. The areas under the ROC curves for the two metrics were 0.983 and 0.984, respectively (p = 0.11). The PSNR and HDR-VDP accurately predicted the visually lossless threshold for 69% and 72% of the 100 images (p = 0.68), respectively, at the cutoff values balancing sensitivity and specificity and for 43% and 47% (p = 0.22), respectively, at the cutoff values reaching 100% sensitivity. CONCLUSION Both metrics are promising in predicting the perceptible compression artifacts and therefore can potentially be used to estimate the visually lossless threshold.

[1]  Evis Sala,et al.  Lossy 3D JPEG2000 compression of abdominal CT images in patients with acute abdominal complaints: effect of compression ratio on diagnostic confidence and accuracy. , 2008, Radiology.

[2]  Bruce I. Reiner,et al.  Correlation of radiologists' image quality perception with quantitative assessment parameters: just-noticeable difference vs. peak signal-to-noise ratios , 2005, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[3]  Rafal Mantiuk,et al.  Artifacts in slab average-intensity-projection images reformatted from JPEG 2000 compressed thin-section abdominal CT data sets. , 2008, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[4]  Edward Muka,et al.  Irreversible JPEG compression of digital chest radiographs for primary interpretation: assessment of visually lossless threshold. , 2003, Radiology.

[5]  Helen Hong,et al.  Managing the CT Data Explosion: Initial Experiences of Archiving Volumetric Datasets in a Mini-PACS , 2005, Journal of Digital Imaging.

[6]  Paul S. Fisher,et al.  Image quality measures and their performance , 1995, IEEE Trans. Commun..

[7]  N A Obuchowski,et al.  Nonparametric analysis of clustered ROC curve data. , 1997, Biometrics.

[8]  Heung-Sik Kang,et al.  Regional difference in compression artifacts in low-dose chest CT images: effects of mathematical and perceptual factors. , 2008, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[9]  Henry Rusinek,et al.  Effect of CT image compression on computer-assisted lung nodule volume measurement. , 2005, Radiology.

[10]  Scott J. Daly,et al.  Visible differences predictor: an algorithm for the assessment of image fidelity , 1992, Electronic Imaging.

[11]  Andrew P. Bradley,et al.  Perceptual quality metrics applied to still image compression , 1998, Signal Process..

[12]  A. Scott,et al.  A simple method for the analysis of clustered binary data. , 1992, Biometrics.

[13]  Heung-Sik Kang,et al.  Objective index of image fidelity for JPEG2000 compressed body CT images. , 2009, Medical physics.

[14]  Bruce I. Reiner,et al.  Discrete cosine transform JPEG compression vs. 2D JPEG2000 compression: JNDmetrix visual discrimination model image quality analysis , 2005, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[15]  Bohyoung Kim,et al.  Regional variance of visually lossless threshold in compressed chest CT images: lung versus mediastinum and chest wall. , 2009, European journal of radiology.

[16]  Bohyoung Kim,et al.  Definition of compression ratio: difference between two commercial JPEG2000 program libraries. , 2008, Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association.

[17]  Alan C. Bovik,et al.  41 OBJECTIVE VIDEO QUALITY ASSESSMENT , 2003 .

[18]  Yoshimitsu Ohgiya,et al.  Acute cerebral infarction: effect of JPEG compression on detection at CT. , 2003, Radiology.

[19]  G S Gazelle,et al.  Focal hepatic lesions: effect of three-dimensional wavelet compression on detection at CT. , 1997, Radiology.

[20]  Hans-Peter Seidel,et al.  Predicting visible differences in high dynamic range images: model and its calibration , 2005, IS&T/SPIE Electronic Imaging.

[21]  Bo Hyoung Kim,et al.  Irreversible JPEG 2000 compression of abdominal CT for primary interpretation: assessment of visually lossless threshold , 2006, European Radiology.

[22]  Gary W. Meyer,et al.  Comparison of two image quality models , 1998, Electronic Imaging.

[23]  Thomas Richter,et al.  JPEG2000 3D compression vs. 2D compression: an assessment of artifact amount and computing time in compressing thin-section abdomen CT images. , 2009, Medical physics.

[24]  J. Fleiss,et al.  The Reliability of Dichotomous Judgments: Unequal Numbers of Judges per Subject , 1979 .

[25]  Michael W. Marcellin,et al.  Compression of multislice CT: 2D vs. 3D JPEG2000 and effects of slice thickness , 2005, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[26]  Quick Rf A vector-magnitude model of contrast detection. , 1974 .

[27]  Jiahua Fan,et al.  Using a human visual system model to optimize soft-copy mammography display: influence of MTF compensation. , 2003, Academic radiology.

[28]  Scott J. Daly A visual model for optimizing the design of image processing algorithms , 1994, Proceedings of 1st International Conference on Image Processing.

[29]  N A Obuchowski,et al.  On the comparison of correlated proportions for clustered data. , 1998, Statistics in medicine.

[30]  Bohyoung Kim,et al.  Differences in compression artifacts on thin- and thick-section lung CT images. , 2008, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[31]  Hans Roehrig,et al.  Using a human visual system model to optimize soft-copy mammography display: influence of display phosphor. , 2003, Academic radiology.

[32]  P R Mueller,et al.  CT colonography with teleradiology: effect of lossy wavelet compression on polyp detection--initial observations. , 2001, Radiology.

[33]  Mathias Prokop,et al.  JPEG2000 compression of thin-section CT images of the lung: effect of compression ratio on image quality. , 2006, Radiology.

[34]  A. Manduca,et al.  Wavelet compression of medical images. , 1998, Radiology.

[35]  Henry Rusinek,et al.  Wavelet compression of low-dose chest CT data: effect on lung nodule detection. , 2003, Radiology.

[36]  Bohyoung Kim,et al.  JPEG 2000 compression of abdominal CT: difference in tolerance between thin- and thick-section images. , 2007, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[37]  Jeffrey Lubin,et al.  The use of psychophysical data and models in the analysis of display system performance , 1993 .

[38]  Majid Rabbani,et al.  An overview of the JPEG 2000 still image compression standard , 2002, Signal Process. Image Commun..