Gadolinium-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Angiography for Pulmonary Embolism

BACKGROUND The accuracy of gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance pulmonary angiography and magnetic resonance venography for diagnosing pulmonary embolism has not been determined conclusively. OBJECTIVE To investigate performance characteristics of magnetic resonance angiography, with or without magnetic resonance venography, for diagnosing pulmonary embolism. DESIGN Prospective, multicenter study from 10 April 2006 to 30 September 2008. SETTING 7 hospitals and their emergency services. PATIENTS 371 adults with diagnosed or excluded pulmonary embolism. MEASUREMENTS Sensitivity, specificity, and likelihood ratios were measured by comparing independently read magnetic resonance imaging with the reference standard for diagnosing pulmonary embolism. Reference standard diagnosis or exclusion was made by using various tests, including computed tomographic angiography and venography, ventilation-perfusion lung scan, venous ultrasonography, d-dimer assay, and clinical assessment. RESULTS Magnetic resonance angiography, averaged across centers, was technically inadequate in 25% of patients (92 of 371). The proportion of technically inadequate images ranged from 11% to 52% at various centers. Including patients with technically inadequate images, magnetic resonance angiography identified 57% (59 of 104) with pulmonary embolism. Technically adequate magnetic resonance angiography had a sensitivity of 78% and a specificity of 99%. Technically adequate magnetic resonance angiography and venography had a sensitivity of 92% and a specificity of 96%, but 52% of patients (194 of 370) had technically inadequate results. LIMITATION A high proportion of patients with suspected embolism was not eligible or declined to participate. CONCLUSION Magnetic resonance pulmonary angiography should be considered only at centers that routinely perform it well and only for patients for whom standard tests are contraindicated. Magnetic resonance pulmonary angiography and magnetic resonance venography combined have a higher sensitivity than magnetic resonance pulmonary angiography alone in patients with technically adequate images, but it is more difficult to obtain technically adequate images with the 2 procedures.

[1]  M Gent,et al.  Use of a Clinical Model for Safe Management of Patients with Suspected Pulmonary Embolism , 1998, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[2]  Ronnie Driver,et al.  Biostatistics: a Methodology for the Health Sciences , 2005 .

[3]  J. D. Garnic,et al.  Reliability of selective pulmonary arteriography in the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism. , 1987, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[4]  M. Oudkerk,et al.  Comparison of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography and conventional pulmonary angiography for the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism: a prospective study , 2002, The Lancet.

[5]  D. Rennie,et al.  Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: the STARD initiative , 2003, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[6]  Lloyd D. Fisher,et al.  2. Biostatistics: A Methodology for the Health Sciences , 1994 .

[7]  F. Rybicki,et al.  Time-resolved MR angiography: a primary screening examination of patients with suspected pulmonary embolism and contraindications to administration of iodinated contrast material. , 2007, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[8]  H. Sostman,et al.  Sensitivity and Specificity of Perfusion Scintigraphy Combined with Chest Radiography for Acute Pulmonary Embolism in PIOPED II , 2008, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[9]  J. Brink,et al.  Anatomic distribution of pulmonary emboli at pulmonary angiography: implications for cross-sectional imaging. , 1996, Radiology.

[10]  J. Lijmer,et al.  Comparison of a Clinical Probability Estimate and Two Clinical Models in Patients with Suspected Pulmonary Embolism , 2000, Thrombosis and Haemostasis.

[11]  David Moher,et al.  The STARD Statement for Reporting Studies of Diagnostic Accuracy: Explanation and Elaboration , 2003, Annals of Internal Medicine [serial online].

[12]  M. Gent,et al.  Rivaroxaban versus enoxaparin for thromboprophylaxis after total knee arthroplasty (RECORD4): a randomised trial , 2009, The Lancet.

[13]  G. Guyatt,et al.  Users' Guides to the Medical Literature: III. How to Use an Article About a Diagnostic Test: B. What Are the Results and Will They Help Me In Caring for My Patients? , 1994 .

[14]  William A Ghali,et al.  d-Dimer for the Exclusion of Acute Venous Thrombosis and Pulmonary Embolism , 2004, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[15]  B. Eriksson,et al.  Rivaroxaban versus enoxaparin for thromboprophylaxis after hip arthroplasty. , 2008, The New England journal of medicine.

[16]  M. Wood,et al.  Analysis and interpretation of data. , 1978, The Journal of family practice.

[17]  Y. Ohno,et al.  MR angiography with sensitivity encoding (SENSE) for suspected pulmonary embolism: comparison with MDCT and ventilation-perfusion scintigraphy. , 2004, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[18]  J Thrall,et al.  Ventilation-perfusion scintigraphy in the PIOPED study. Part II. Evaluation of the scintigraphic criteria and interpretations. , 1993, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[19]  P. Douek,et al.  Dynamic contrast-enhanced MR angiography of pulmonary embolism: comparison with pulmonary angiography. , 1994, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[20]  W. Luboldt,et al.  Acute pulmonary embolism to the subsegmental level: diagnostic accuracy of three MRI techniques compared with 16-MDCT. , 2006, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[21]  F. Sampson,et al.  The accuracy of MRI in diagnosis of suspected deep vein thrombosis: systematic review and meta-analysis , 2006, European Radiology.

[22]  P. J. Drury,et al.  Acute pulmonary embolism: diagnosis with MR angiography. , 1999, Radiology.

[23]  Elsayed A. Elsayed,et al.  A Methodology for the Health Sciences , 1997 .

[24]  Pamela K Woodard,et al.  Multidetector computed tomography for acute pulmonary embolism. , 2006, The New England journal of medicine.

[25]  L. Goodman,et al.  Small pulmonary emboli: what do we know? , 2005, Radiology.

[26]  J Paul Finn,et al.  Noncontrast 3D Steady-State Free-Precession Magnetic Resonance Angiography of the Whole Chest Using Nonselective Radiofrequency Excitation over a Large Field of View: Comparison With Single-Phase 3D Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Angiography , 2008, Investigative radiology.

[27]  J. W. Henry,et al.  Prevalence of acute pulmonary embolism in central and subsegmental pulmonary arteries and relation to probability interpretation of ventilation/perfusion lung scans. , 2008, Chest.

[28]  H. Sostman,et al.  Overview of Prospective Investigation of Pulmonary Embolism Diagnosis II. , 2002, Seminars in nuclear medicine.

[29]  Jeffrey S. Ginsberg,et al.  Comparison of a Clinical Probability Estimate and Two Clinical Models in Patients with Suspected Pulmonary Embolism , 2000, Thrombosis and Haemostasis.

[30]  S. Frostick,et al.  Dabigatran etexilate versus enoxaparin for prevention of venous thromboembolism after total hip replacement: a randomised, double-blind, non-inferiority trial , 2007, The Lancet.

[31]  A. Planès,et al.  Risk of deep-venous thrombosis after hospital discharge in patients having undergone total hip replacement: double-blind randomised comparison of enoxaparin versus placebo , 1996, The Lancet.

[32]  J. Topf,et al.  Nephrogenic Fibrosing Dermopathy , 2008, TheScientificWorldJournal.

[33]  L. Tamariz,et al.  Diagnosis and treatment of deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism. , 2003, Evidence report/technology assessment.

[34]  Dariusch R Hadizadeh,et al.  Peripheral MR angiography with blood pool contrast agent: prospective intraindividual comparative study of high-spatial-resolution steady-state MR angiography versus standard-resolution first-pass MR angiography and DSA. , 2008, Radiology.

[35]  F. Guillemin,et al.  Performance of magnetic resonance angiography in suspected acute pulmonary embolism , 2005, Thrombosis and Haemostasis.

[36]  G. Guyatt,et al.  Users' guides to the medical literature. III. How to use an article about a diagnostic test. B. What are the results and will they help me in caring for my patients? The Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group. , 1994, JAMA.

[37]  G. Kovacs,et al.  Excluding Pulmonary Embolism at the Bedside without Diagnostic Imaging: Management of Patients with Suspected Pulmonary Embolism Presenting to the Emergency Department by Using a Simple Clinical Model and d-dimer , 2001, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[38]  U. Lange,et al.  Experience in 207 combined MRI examinations for acute pulmonary embolism and deep vein thrombosis. , 2006, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[39]  C. Chartrand-Lefebvre,et al.  Gadolinium-enhanced pulmonary magnetic resonance angiography in the diagnosis of acute pulmonary embolism: a prospective study on 48 patients. , 2006, Clinical imaging.

[40]  T L Chenevert,et al.  Diagnosis of pulmonary embolism with magnetic resonance angiography. , 1997, The New England journal of medicine.

[41]  E. DeLong,et al.  Intermediate, Indeterminate, and Uninterpretable Diagnostic Test Results , 1987, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[42]  H. Sostman,et al.  Methods of Prospective Investigation of Pulmonary Embolism Diagnosis III (PIOPED III). , 2008, Seminars in nuclear medicine.