Study of common database feeding with results coming from different analytical methods in the framework of illicit drugs chemical profiling.

Analytical results harmonisation is investigated in this study to provide an alternative to the restrictive approach of analytical methods harmonisation which is recommended nowadays for making possible the exchange of information and then for supporting the fight against illicit drugs trafficking. Indeed, the main goal of this study is to demonstrate that a common database can be fed by a range of different analytical methods, whatever the differences in levels of analytical parameters between these latter ones. For this purpose, a methodology making possible the estimation and even the optimisation of results similarity coming from different analytical methods was then developed. In particular, the possibility to introduce chemical profiles obtained with Fast GC-FID in a GC-MS database is studied in this paper. By the use of the methodology, the similarity of results coming from different analytical methods can be objectively assessed and the utility in practice of database sharing by these methods can be evaluated, depending on profiling purposes (evidential vs. operational perspective tool). This methodology can be regarded as a relevant approach for database feeding by different analytical methods and puts in doubt the necessity to analyse all illicit drugs seizures in one single laboratory or to implement analytical methods harmonisation in each participating laboratory.

[1]  P. Lebrun,et al.  Innovative methodology to transfer conventional GC-MS heroin profiling to UHPLC-MS/MS , 2011, Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry.

[2]  S Lociciro,et al.  Cocaine profiling for strategic intelligence, a cross-border project between France and Switzerland: part II. Validation of the statistical methodology for the profiling of cocaine. , 2008, Forensic Science International.

[3]  D. Brynn Hibbert,et al.  A probabilistic approach to heroin signatures , 2010, Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry.

[4]  P ? ? ? ? ? ? ? % ? ? ? ? , 1991 .

[5]  P. Filzmoser,et al.  Statistical Data Analysis Explained , 2008 .

[6]  James Robertson,et al.  Illicit drug profiling: the Australian experience , 2007 .

[7]  Pierre Esseiva,et al.  Illicit drug profiling, reflection on statistical comparisons. , 2011, Forensic science international.

[8]  Clemens Reimann,et al.  Statistical data analysis explained : applied environmental statics with R , 2008 .

[9]  Johanna Smeyers-Verbeke,et al.  Handbook of Chemometrics and Qualimetrics: Part A , 1997 .

[10]  David R Morello,et al.  Signature Profiling and Classification of Illicit Heroin by GC‐MS Analysis of Acidic and Neutral Manufacturing Impurities , 2010, Journal of forensic sciences.

[11]  S Lociciro,et al.  Cocaine profiling for strategic intelligence purposes, a cross-border project between France and Switzerland. Part I. Optimisation and harmonisation of the profiling method. , 2007, Forensic science international.

[12]  Alex Biedermann,et al.  Forensic drug intelligence: an important tool in law enforcement. , 2007, Forensic science international.

[13]  B Caddy,et al.  Development of a harmonised pan-European method for the profiling of amphetamines. , 2001, Science & justice : journal of the Forensic Science Society.

[14]  Philip Doble,et al.  Chemical profiling and classification of illicit heroin by principal component analysis, calculation of inter sample correlation and artificial neural networks. , 2005, Talanta.

[15]  F Taroni,et al.  A methodology for illicit heroin seizures comparison in a drug intelligence perspective using large databases. , 2003, Forensic science international.

[16]  L Strömberg,et al.  Heroin impurity profiling. A harmonization study for retrospective comparisons. , 2000, Forensic science international.